Theories as a Heuristic Thinking Device to Create Empathy in [Interior] Design Studios
Main Article Content
Abstract
This design case introduces a design and development process of theories from environmental psychology, humanities, and social sciences as heuristic thinking devices to measure human-centered design solutions. The pedagogical review of the traditional studio design process revealed obstacles as students translated their research and program to the development of the design. They created the latter without applying their theoretical understanding of research conducted on the human-environment relationship. Given this challenge, the authors evolved a revised design method utilizing theories to afford an empathetic design response. Students in two interior design studios adopted this approach to develop hypotheses for the design problem, and later the theories informed guidelines for cultivating a more empathetic design response. Project analysis by authors, and reflection statements from the students, capture the value of theory as thinking devices to assist directly in their work by improving their position and power, prompting a more imaginative and generative ideation process. The role of this design case is to acknowledge the role of theory as a heuristic device in order to generate, develop, and support the advancement of interior design as a discipline through interaction, mediation, and discourse.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright © 2023 by the International Journal of Designs for Learning, a publication of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) and Indiana University. Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page in print or the first screen in digital media. Except as otherwise noted, the content published by IJDL is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA. A simpler version of this statement is available here.
References
Altman, I. (1981). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Irving Publishers.
Angne Alfaro, S. (2012). Biomimicry: An interior design teaching tool. Biomimicry in Higher Education Webinar. Biomimicry Institute. https://biomimicry.org/shop/proceedings-higher-ed-webinar-2012/
Angne & Patel. (2020). Reassessing the role of theories as a design tool under current global crisis. Interior Designers Educators Council. Regional Presentation-Midwest.
Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Birdsong, C., & Lawlor, P. J. (2001). Perceptions of professionalism: Interior design practitioners working for the top 100 firms. Journal of Interior Design, 27(1), 20–34.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.
Brown, T., and B. Katz. (2011). “Change by Design.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (3): 381–383. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x.
Chalmers, L. and Close, S. (2007). ’But is it Interior Design’, in Thinking Inside the Box, London: Middlesex University Press. ,(p.79).
CIDQ. (2021). Definition of interior design. Retrieved https://www.cidq.org/definition-of-interior-design
Close, S. (2007). Framing identity: social practices of photography in Canada, 1880-1920. Arbeiter Ring Pub.
Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) Standards (2020). Retrieved March 24, 2021, from http://accredit-id.org/professional-standards.
Connell, T.J. (2010) What is Design Thinking? In Guerin, A. D. & Martin, S. C. (2010). The State of the Interior Design Profession. New York: Fairchild Publications, Inc.
DeGuzman, G. V., & Tang, A. I. (2011). Working in the unoffice: a guide to coworking for indie workers, small businesses, and nonprofits. Night Owls Press LLC.
Merriam-webster.com (2020a), “Definition of psychographics”, available at: https://www.merriam webster.com/dictionary/empathy (accessed 22 March 2021).
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: b design, fiction, and social dreaming. The MIT Press.
Glass, T. (2018). Prompt: Socially Engaging Objects and Environments. Birkhäuser.
Guerin, A. D. & Martin, S. C. (2010). The State of the Interior Design Profession. New York: Fairchild Publications, Inc.
Gerdes, K. E., E. A Segal, K. F. Jackson, and J. L. Mullins. (2011). “Teaching Empathy: A Framework Rooted in Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Justice.” Journal of Social Work Education 47 (1): 109–131. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900085.
Greeno, James. (1994). Gibson's Affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.336.
Giuliani, M. V. & Feldman, R. (1993) Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 267-274.
Hall, E. T. (1992). The Hidden Dimension. Peter Smith Pub.
Hasell, M. J., & Peatross, F. D. (1991). Developing a theoretical perspective and methods about interior space and society. Journal of Interior Design, 17(1), 49–58.
Howe, D. 2013. Empathy: What It Is and Why It Matters. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Hunt, R. (2007). “Service-Learning: An Eye-Opening Experience That Provokes Emotion and Challenges Stereotypes.” Journal of Nursing Education 46: 277 281.
Hummon, D.M. 1992. Community Attachment: Local Sentiment and Sense of Place. In I. Altman and S. Low (Eds.) Place Attachment. New York: Plenum Press
IDEO. (2010). Bootcamp Bootleg D. School. Available athttp://dschool.typepad.com/files/bootcampbootleg2010v2slim-1.pdf. Hassno Platner & Institute of Design at Standford University.
IDEO (2011). Bootcamp Bootleg. d. School Hasso Plattner. Institute of Design at Sandford.
Junot, A., Paquet, Y., & Fenouillet, F. (2018). Place attachment influence on human well‐being and general pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology. 2(2), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.18
Kaplan, S. (1988). Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York:
Cambridge University Press
Kouprie, M., and F. Visser. (2009). “A Framework for Empathy in Design: Stepping into and Out of the User’s Life.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (5): 437–448. doi:10.1080/09544820902875033.
Loustau, J. (1988). A theoretical base for interior design: A review of four approaches from related fields. Journal of Interior Design,14(1), 3–8.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of a city. Cambridge: MA; MIT Press
Merleau-Ponty, M., & Smith, C. (2018). Phenomenology of perception. Franklin Classics.
Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409409513214
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible Space; Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan.
Nussbaumer, L. L. (2009). Evidence-based design for interior designers. New York: Fairchild Books.
Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place: inspiring stories about the "great good places" at the heart of our communities. Marlowe & Co.
Oldenburg, R. (2017, June 1). Third Places in Culture - Ray Oldenburg Q&A. Steelcase. https://www.steelcase.com/research/articles/topics/design-q-a/q-ray-oldenburg/.
Pallasmaa, J. (2015). The eyes of the skin: architecture and the senses. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Pena, W., & Parshall, S. (2001). Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Postma, C., E. Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E. Daemen, and J. Du. 2012.“Challenges of Doing Empathic Design: Experiences from Industry.” International Journal of Design 6 (1): 59–70.
Relph, E. (2016). Place and Placelessness. Sage.
Rowe, P. (1998). Design Thinking. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Rowe, P. (1982). A Priori Knowledge and Heuristic Reasoning in Architectural Design. JAE, 36(1), 18-23. doi:10.2307/1424603
Sanders, E. 2002. “From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches.” In Design and the Social Sciences Making Connections, edited by J. Frascara and Ebrary, Inc., 1–8. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Sanders, E., and U. Dandavate. 1999. “Design for Experiencing: New Tools”. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design
and Emotion, edited by C. J. Overbeeke and P. Hekkert. The Netherland: TU Delft.
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Harper
Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Collins.
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1971). Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, 26(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030806
Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, INc. Ch.1-5.
Stokols D. (2000) Theory Development in Environmental Psychology. In: Wapner S., Demick J., Yamamoto T., Minami H. (eds) Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4701-3_21
Swaranjali, P., Patel, T. and Espersen-Peters, K. (2021). "Next time, with empathy: revisiting the studio pedagogy for transitional housing for refugees", Archnet-IJAR, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-08-2020-0173
Tellez Bohorquez, F. A. (2017). “Empathy Expression and Development in the Context of Industrial Design Education (Order No. 10610834).” Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1914694168).
Tilley, C. (2006). ‘Theoretical Perspectives’ in Tilley, C., et al.(eds), Handbook of Material Culture, London: Sage
Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspectives of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 235 pp.
Zingoni, M. (2019). Beyond Aesthetics, Empathy First, The Design Journal, 22:3, 351-370, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1592808