Main Article Content
In scientific disciplines, most postdoctoral fellowships focus on research training. Postdoctoral fellows (“postdocs”) develop research expertise and research projects that they will use in future independent faculty positions. This research focus often precludes opportunities for undergraduate teaching. However, most academic faculty positions require faculty to teach at the undergraduate level. The result is that many postdocs are exceptionally well-qualified to meet the research expectations of future faculty positions, but lack experience and training in innovative and evidence-based undergraduate teaching strategies. Training in evidence-based teaching approaches can result in two tangible outcomes. First, the quality of applications by the postdocs for tenure-track faculty positions at institutions with substantive teaching expectations can be improved. Second, we can anticipate stronger alignment of teaching and learning expectations between new faculty and their undergraduate students. There are many programs that provide training in teaching to early career researchers. We describe the design and implementation of a mentored teaching experience that faced some unique challenges, including a large geographic distance between the postdocs and the teaching mentor and teaching site. We describe how we addressed the challenges, what the benefits to various stakeholders have been, and the key elements that contributed to the success of the program.
Copyright © 2012 by the International Journal of Designs for Learning, a publication of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology. (AECT). Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page in print or the first screen in digital media. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than IJDL or AECT must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. The IJDL site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-NC-ND. A simpler version of this statement is available here.
Beichner, J. (2014). History and Evolution of Active Learning Spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 137, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20081
Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J.D. & Brooks, D.C. (2013). “It’s Not You, It’s the Room”- Are the High-Tech, Active Learning Classrooms Worth it? J. Coll. Sci. Teaching, 42, 82-88. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst13_042_06_82
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., …Wood. W.B. (2004). Scientific Teaching. Science, 304, 521-522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
Hornstein, H.A. & Law, H.F. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Awards (IRACDA) (K12). (2018). https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Training/CareerDev/Pages/TWDInstRes.aspx (retrieved 5/27/2018)
Price, R. STEP: Science Teaching Experience for Postdocs. (n.d.). http://faculty.washington.edu/beccap/step.html (retrieved 5/27/2018)
Shuster, M., and Peterson, K. (2009) Development, Implementation and Assessment of a Lecture Course on Cancer for Undergraduates. CBE Life Sciences Education Vol 8: 193-202.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (1998). “What is backward design?” In Understanding by Design. (1 ed., pp. 7–19). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://www.fitnyc.edu/files/pdfs/Backward_design.pd 5/27/2018.
Wright, C. (2018). http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/training/workshops/ (retrieved 5/27/2018)
Yale Center for Teaching and Learning. (2018). https://www.summerinstitutes.org/ (retrieved 5/27/2018)