Empowerment and Constraint: Design of a Homecare Worker Training Program
Main Article Content
Abstract
A worker education center in California requested the development of a job training pilot program for 6,000 state-remunerated homecare workers. These workers provide personal care services to Medicaid-eligible adults over 65 years of age and to adults with disabilities, enabling them to remain living at home. In recognition of the homecare workers’ position as a first line of defense against health crises and costly hospitalizations, the center sought to enhance their roles by training them to be more engaged members of the care team and more knowledgeable in health and safety topics. The training design was challenging for two reasons. First, in California, consumers (recipients of care) are the legal employers of their homecare workers and are their designated job trainers. This hard-won right clashed with elements of the center’s training initiative. Second, diverse linguistic backgrounds limited education and low literacy levels among homecare workers led to a non-traditional approach to worker training that required buy-in from diverse stakeholders. The design process was fast-paced and iterative, involving research around themes established by committee, coordination with an illustrator, and numerous revisions in consultation with subject matter experts, including a disability rights advocate who was also a consumer. The result was a hands-on, collaborative design rooted in social constructivist learning theory. After two years, health outcomes among consumers whose homecare workers received training were positive, leading us to infer that both the design and the efforts to address learners’ needs and consumers’ concerns had been effective.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright © 2023 by the International Journal of Designs for Learning, a publication of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) and Indiana University. Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page in print or the first screen in digital media. Except as otherwise noted, the content published by IJDL is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA. A simpler version of this statement is available here.
References
AARP Public Policy Institute. (2011). Aging in place: A state survey of livability policies and practices. Washington, D.C., National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/liv-com/aging-in-place-2011-full.pdf
California Long-Term Care Education Center. (May, 2016). Care team integration and training of home care workers: Impact study. Retrieved from https://cltcec.org/pdf/CLTCEC%20Home%20Care%20Integration%20Training%20Exec%20Summary%20June%202016.pdf
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U. S. C. §18001 (2010).
Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute. (2016). U.S. home care workers: Key facts. Bronx, NY: PHInational.org. Retrieved from http://phinational.org/sites/phinational.org/files/phi-home-care-workerskey-facts.pdf
Seavey, D., & Marquand, A. (January 16, 2013). Preparing America to care: Training our nation’s homecare workers. Aging Today. San Francisco, CA: American Society on Aging. Retrieved from http://www.asaging.org/blog/preparing-america-care-training-our-nations-homecare-workers
U.S. Department of Labor (2018) Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Home Health Aides and Personal Care Aides. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/home-health-aides.htm