Enacting a Reform-Based Science Curriculum: Design Changes to Extend Inquiry

Main Article Content

Charles J. Eick
Michael Dias


The first author re-entered the middle grades classroom to teach a new National Science Foundation (NSF) physical science curriculum that was designed to foster conceptual change through a scientific approach. The curriculum design met the need and call for reform in science education through its focus on inquiry, evidence-based reasoning, peer collaboration, and deeper understanding of important concepts in a science discipline. Lessons followed a learning cycle of activities for knowledge construction. As a self-study, the first author as teacher sought to learn about his beliefs and abilities in practice while enacting and adjusting the curriculum design. The second author helped in this reflective practice through visiting the first author’s classroom for periodic observations, interviews, and discussions about the implementation of this curriculum. Four videotaped lessons and instructional artifacts demonstrate that the teacher enacted the curriculum with high fidelity to its prescribed inquiries and learning cycle format with only minor changes. Instructional design modifications were made in practice to assist lower achieving students meet its high academic challenge of analytical thinking. The merits of the prescribed curriculum for promoting deductive scientific thinking are detailed alongside instructional design decisions emanating from the curriculums’ academic rigor and limitations in connecting to adolescent interest and choice. This case details one example of a teacher who intended to faithfully implement a reform-based science curriculum, realizing along the way, that design changes were warranted to meet the educative and emotional needs of students in a particular context. 



Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Eick, C. J., & Dias, M. (2016). Enacting a Reform-Based Science Curriculum: Design Changes to Extend Inquiry. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v7i1.19524
K-12 Classroom Implementation
Author Biographies

Charles J. Eick, University of West Georgia

Charles J. Eick is an Associate Professor of Secondary Education at the University of West Georgia where he teaches science and math education courses in the Teach and MAT Programs. His research interests include inquiry as a preferred method of teaching, STEM teacher recruitment and retention, and how personal biography influences teacher identity, choices in practice, and sense of vocation.

Michael Dias, Kennesaw State University

Michael Dias is an Associate Professor of Biology Education at Kennesaw State University where he coordinates undergraduate biology, chemistry and physics teacher education and teaches in the OwlTeach Program. His research and service focuses on K-12 science teacher mentoring, integrated with coteaching with middle and high school science teachers to cultivate more caring, communal and educative

experiences for all learners.


Beeth, M. E., & Hewson, P. W. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher’s practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83, 738-760.

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heninemann.

Dias, M., Eick, C. J., & Brantley-Dias, L. (2011). Practicing what we teach: A self-study in implementing an inquiry-based curriculum in a middle grades classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 53-78.

Goldberg, F., Bendall, S., Heller, P., & Poel, R. (2006). Interactions in physical science. Armonk, NY: It’s About Time.

Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills (Monograph, Number One). Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of selfstudy. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 12-20.

Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.

National Research Council (NRC). (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC. The National Academies Press. http://www.nextgenscience.org