Atom Tracker: Designing a Mobile Augmented Reality Experience to Support Instruction About Cycles and Conservation of Matter in Outdoor Learning Environments

Main Article Content

Amy M. Kamarainen
Shari Metcalf
Tina A. Grotzer
Craig Brimhall
Chris Dede

Abstract

We describe a mobile augmented reality (AR) experience called Atom Tracker designed to help middle school students better understand the cycling of matter in ecosystems with a focus on the concept of conservation of matter and the processes of photosynthesis and respiration. Location-based AR allows students to locate virtual "hotspots," where they interact with multiple representations including vision-based AR animations of virtual atoms during ecological processes such as photosynthesis and physical LEGO® -based representations of molecules. This design case describes the design rationale, the iterative design process, the context for implementation, and reflections on the success and limitations of the Atom Tracker AR experience. An augmented reality interface was chosen due to theoretical support for its utility in supporting interaction with multiple representations (both physical and virtual) of atoms and molecules, the ability to condense and expand temporal and spatial scales associated with ecological processes, and its ability to explicitly situate these representations in real-world contexts that could support learning. Two significant design challenges that we recognized were (a) appropriately leveraging narrative, student engagement and agency when designing around the topic of atoms and molecules, which are inanimate and invisible; and (b) designing for engagement with both virtual and physical resources available during the experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T. A., Brimhall, C., & Dede, C. (2016). Atom Tracker: Designing a Mobile Augmented Reality Experience to Support Instruction About Cycles and Conservation of Matter in Outdoor Learning Environments. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v7i2.19430
Section
K-12 Classroom Implementation

References

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2-3), 131–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9

Chang, H.-Y., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 94(1), 73-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20352

Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. 2013. Augmented reality teaching and learning. In M. J. Bishop & J. Elen (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 735-745). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Grotzer, T.A. (2012). Learning causality in a complex world: Understandings of consequence. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world. In Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 189-212). Springer Netherlands.

Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Anthropomorphism and animism in early years science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 291-31.

Kamarainen, A.M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T. & Dede, C. (2016). EcoMOBILE—Designing for contextualized STEM learning using mobile technologies and augmented reality. In H. Crompton & J. Traxler (Eds.) Mobile learning and STEM: Case studies in practice (pp. 98-124). Routledge.

Lin, C. Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Students’ understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1529-1544.

O’Shea, P., Mitchell, R., Johnston, C., & Dede, C. (2009). Lessons learned about designing augmented realities. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 1(1), 1-15.

Özmen, H. (2011). Effect of animation enhanced conceptual change texts on 6th grade students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and transformation during phase changes. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1114–1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.004

Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Reasoning with atomic-scale molecular dynamic models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51-66.

Smith, C., Snir, J., & Raz, G. (2002). Can middle schoolers understand the particulate theory of matter as an explanatory model? An exploratory study. In American Educational Research Association meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Smith, C., Wiser, M., & Anderson, C. W. (2004). Implications of research on children’s learning for assessment: Matter and atomic molecular theory. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. Center for Education, National Research Council.1–79.

Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., Krajcik, J., & Coppola, B. (2004). Implications of research on children’s learning for assessment: Matter and atomic molecular theory. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. Center for Education, National Research Council.

Stavridou, H., & Solomonidou, C. (1998). Conceptual reorganization and the construction of the chemical reaction concept during secondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 205-221.

Stern, L., Barnea, N., & Shauli, S. (2008). The effect of a computerized simulation on middle school students’ understanding of the kinetic molecular theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 305-315.

Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(6), 538-568.

Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (1996). The secret life of the chemical bond: Students’ anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 557–568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180505

Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet.” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435

Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57-67.

Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126

Xie, Q and R. Tinker. 2006. Molecular dynamics simulations of chemical reactions for use in education. Journal of Chemical Education 83(1), 77-83.