12.06.01, Mondschein, Response to TMR 12.04.25, Anne Curry's review of The Knightly Art of Battle

Main Article Content

Response by Ken Mondschein

The Medieval Review 12.06.01

Mondschein, Ken. Response to TMR 12.04.25, Anne Curry's review of . The Knightly Art of Battle. . 2012.
Reviewed by:

Response by Ken Mondschein
Higgins Armory Museum
ken -at - kenmondschein dot com

I would like to thank Professor Curry for her kind words; to have a scholar such as she praise my work is most gratifying. However, I cannot take full credit for The Knightly Art of Battle, as it was really a group effort. Elizabeth Morrison, curator of manuscripts at the Getty; Greg Britton, the former publisher; and Kurt Hauser, our designer, are at least as responsible as I am for its style and content.

I wrote The Knightly Art of Battle at the Getty's behest in about a week. There was a need in this popular-audience work to limit my foreign-language bibliography, which is why neither Malpiero's book nor that of Rubboli and Cesari is mentioned--although I did manage to slip in Cavina, whose work I think should be more widely known. It is not the book I would have written if we lived in a world designed by Rousseau, but it is a means of testing the scholarly and popular waters for the feasibility of a full translation and study of all four of Fiore dei Liberi's fascinating manuscripts (besides being a painless introduction to medieval warfare for undergraduates). I therefore exhort all those who would be interested in seeing such a work to order a copy of The Knightly Art of Battle for themselves and/or their school libraries.

Article Details

Section
Reviews
Author Biography

Response by Ken Mondschein

Higgins Armory Museum