Too cool for school?: The effects of gamification in an advanced interdisciplinary course
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Burke, B. (November 4, 2012). “Gamification 2020: What is the Future of Gamification?” Gartner Research Report 4.
Clauss, J. & Geedey, K. (June 2010). Knowledge surveys: Students ability to self-assess. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 10(2), pg. 14-24.
Davies, M. & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Implications for Teaching and Learning. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 22, pg. 113-120. doi 10.1037/h0032355
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiements examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 125, pg. 627–668. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
Deitz, B. (July 22, 2010). Games on the Go: Text-Based Adventures, Past and Present. Switched: HuffingtonPost.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference. Pg. 9-15.
DiPiro, J. (2010). Student Learning: Perception versus Reality. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74 (4). doi 10.5688/aj740463
Dominguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernandez-Sanz, L., Pages, C., & Martínez-Herráiz , J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education. 63, pg. 380-392. doi 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Donston-Mille, D. (May 9, 2012). “Is Gamification a Great Motivator?” Information Week.
Educause Learning Initiative (2011). Seven Things You Should Know about Gamification. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-gamification
Elson, M., Breuer, J., Ivory, J., Quandt, T. (June 2014) More Than Stories With Buttons, Narrative, Mechanics, and Context as Determinants of Player Experience in Digital Games. Journal of Communication. 64(3), p. 521 – 542. doi 10.1111/jcom.12096
Erenli, K. (January 2013). The impact of gamification: Recommending education scenarios. IJet, 8(1), pg 15-21.
Green, M. & Jenkins, K. (June 2014). Interactive Narratives: Processes and Outcomes in UserDirected Stories. Journal of Communication. 64(3), p 479 – 500. doi 10.1111/jcom.12093
Habgood, J. (2007). Effective Integration of Digital Games and Learning Content., Masters Thesis. Available online at academia.edu.
Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), pg 236-245. doi 10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004
Hamari, J. & Koivisto, J. (2013). Social motivations to use gamification: An empirical study of gamifying exercise. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, Netherlands, June 5-8, 2013.
Huotari, K. & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification: A service marketing perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference 2012, Tampere, Finland, October 3-5, 2012.
Hwa Hsu, S., Chang, J.W., & Lee, C.C. (June 2013). Designing Attractive Gamification Features for Collaborative Storytelling Websites. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking. 16(6), p. 428-435. doi 10.1089/cyber.2012.0492
Jensen, M. (2012). Engaging the Learning: Gamification Strives to Keep the Learner’s Interest. T+D, pg. 41-44.
Kapp, K. (October 16, 2012). “Does Gamification have advantage over traditionally designed instruction?” Blog post. http://karlkapp.com/does-gamification-have-advantages-over-traditionally-designed-instruction/
Kapp, K. (June 2012). Games, Gamification, and the Quest for Learner Engagement. T+D, pg 65-68.
Landry, L. (July 2012). “Education isn’t a Game: But Should it Be?” Blog post. http://bostinno.streetwise.co/2012/07/24/education-isnt-a-game-but-should-it-be/
Liaw, S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavior intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, pg. 864-873. Doi : 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
Malone, T. & Lepper (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. In Snow, R. & Farr, M. J. (Ed), Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction Volume 3: Conative and Affective Process Analyses. Hillsdale, NJ.
McCormick, T. (July/August 2013). Anthropology of an Idea: Gamification. Foreign Policy, pg. 27.
Muller, J.Z. (2003). The Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Western Thought. New York: Anchor.
New Media Consortium. (2013). NMC Horizon Report 2013: Higher Education Edition. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2013-horizon-report-HE.pdf
Nijuis, J.F.H., Segers, M.S.R., & Gijselaers, W.H. (2005). Influence of Redesigning a Learning Environment on Student Perceptions and Learning Strategies. Learning Environments Research 8, pg. 67–93. doi 10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3
Petovic, V. & Ivetic, D. (2012). Gamifying Education: A Proposed Taxonomy of Satisfaction Metrics. In Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education Conference, pg. 345-350.
Reboy, L.M. & Semb, G.B. (1991). PSi and critical thinking: Compatibility or irreconcilable differences. Teaching of Psychology, 18, pg. 212-215. Doi : 10.1207/s15328023top1804_2
Repko, A. (2012). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Schuessler, J. (April 7, 2013). “In History Class, Capitalism Sees Its Stock Soar.” New York Times.
Zuckerman, O. & Gal-Oz, A. (2014). Deconstructing gamification: Evaluating the effectiveness of continuous, virtual rewards, and social comparison for promoting physical activity. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 18(7), pg. 1705-1719. doi 10.1007/s00779-014-0783-2