Main Article Content
Globally, policy reform in education has recommended learner-centered pedagogy for more than a century, but its practical implementation remains an illusion in many classrooms. This study describes history teachers’ experiences while experimenting on project-based learning (PjBL) in Zimbabwe’s current curriculum reform initiative. Project-based learning has gained acceptance as an indispensable approach in developing learners’ 21st century skills of creativity, critical thinking, research, and problem-solving. Using a qualitative multiple-case study, four history teachers were observed and interviewed while implementing PjBL at four secondary schools in Zimbabwe. Results indicate policy failures with learner-centered pedagogy. Where some participants and their students had made significant progress, others had done very little at the time the policy reformers withdrew the projects. Feasibility studies could have circumvented some of the pitfalls experienced while enacting PjBL.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
Bas, G. & Senturk, C. (2019). Teaching-learning conceptions and curriculum fidelity: A relational research. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 163-180.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
Buck Institute for Education. (2015). Gold standard PBL: Essential project design elements. Retrieved from https://www.pblworks.org/blog/gold
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. Working Paper. MDRC.
Culclasure, B.T., Longest, K.C. & Terry, T.M. (2019). Project-based learning (PjBL) in three Southeastern schools: Academic, behavioral, and social-emotional outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1842
Dube, B. & Jita, T. (2018). Rethinking healthy school relations for curriculum change in Zimbabwe: A relational leadership approach. Issues in Educational Research, 28(4), 901 917. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/dube.pdf
Drake, S.M. & Reid, J.L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50.
Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students’ perspectives with project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 37-69.
Grant, C. & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house.” Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice and Research, 4(2), 12 26. Doi: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9.
Gwaze, V. (2018). School tasks dropped from curriculum. The Sunday Mail, March 4: 6.
Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M.M. & Capraro, R.M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. Doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a.
Krajcik, J.S. & Blumenfield. (2010). Project-based learning. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 317-333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Major, T. & Mulvihill, T.M. (2018). Problem-based learning pedagogies in teacher education: The case of Botswana. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1), 1 11. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1543
Markham, T., Larmer, J. & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project-based learning for middle and high school teachers (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
Marz, V., Kelchtermans, G., Vanhoof, S. & Onghena, P. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13-24.
Minichielo, V. & Kottler, J. (2010). An overview of the qualitative journey: Reviewing basic concepts. In V. Minichielo & J. Kottler (Eds.), Qualitative journeys: Students and mentor experiences with research (pp. 11-32). New Delhi. Sage.
MOPSE (Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education). (2015a). Curriculum Framework for Primary and Secondary Education 2015-2022. Harare: MOPSE.
MOPSE (Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education). (2015b). History Syllabus Forms 1-4 (History 4044). Harare: MOPSE.
MOPSE (Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education). (2017a). Secretary’s Circular No. 2 of 2017: Implementation of the Curriculum Framework 2015-2022. Harare: MOPSE.
MOPSE (Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education). (2017b). New Curriculum Review Symposium (NCRS) Report. Harare: MOPSE.
Peskova, K., Spurna, M. & Knecht, P. (2019). Teachers’ acceptance of curriculum reform in the Czech Republic: One decade later. CEPS Journal, 9(2), 73-97.
Savery, J.R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
Schwerdt, G. & Wuppermann, A.C. (2011). Sage on the stage: Is lecturing really all that bad? Education Next, 11(3), 62-67.
Tabulawa, R.T. (2013). Teaching and learning in context: Why pedagogical reforms fail in sub-Saharan Africa. Dakar, Senegal: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.
Taylor, N. & Robinson, N. (2019). Secondary education in sub-Saharan Africa: Teacher preparation and support – Literature Review. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jet Education Services.
Virtue, E.E. & Hinnant-Crawford, B.N. (2019). “We are doing things that are meaningful”: Student perspectives of project-based learning across the disciplines. Interdisciplinary Journal of Projects-Based Learning, 13(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1809
ZIMSEC (Zimbabwe Schools Examinations Council). (2017a). Continuous Assessment Task History 4044: Task 1. Harare: ZIMSEC.
ZIMSEC (Zimbabwe Schools Examinations Council). (2017b). Continuous Assessment Implementation Guidelines for Schools. Harare: ZIMSEC.