The Grand Challenge: Helping Teachers Learn/Teach Cutting-Edge Science via a PBL Approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
A mixed-methods research study was designed to examine teachers’ knowledge and confidence for implementing a STEM-based problem-based learning (PBL) unit in their 6–12 grade science and math classrooms. Twenty-one teachers (7 in-service and 13 pre-service) participated in an intensive two-week summer workshop during which they engaged in, and then created, an immersive PBL unit related to sustainable energy. Data were collected through a pre-post content knowledge test and two pre-post surveys—one measuring knowledge and confidence for implementing PBL and one measuring science teaching efficacy. Daily reflections and focus group interviews provided additional data regarding teachers’ changing knowledge and confidence related to both content and PBL methods. Results revealed significant gains in content knowledge related to concepts in energy, confidence for implementing PBL, and science teaching efficacy. Implications for the professional development of rural STEM teachers and the importance of engaging teachers in a professional development experience that integrates STEM content and PBL methods also are discussed.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Agrawal, R., Singh, N. R., Riberio, F. H., & Delgass, W. N. (2007). Sustainable fuel for the transportation sector. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4828–4833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609921104
Anderson, A., Dragsted, S., Evans, R., & Sorensen, H. (2004). The relationship between changes in teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and the science teaching environment of Danish first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000031461.68912.3d
Avery, L. M., & Kassam, K. (2011). Phronesis: Children’s local rural knowledge of science and engineering. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(2), 1–18. http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/26-2.pdf
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barley, Z. (2009). Preparing teachers for rural appointments: lessons from the mid-continent. The Rural Educator, 30(3), 10–15.
Barrett, T. (2005). Understanding problem-based learning. In T. Barrett, I. MacLabhrainn & H. Fallon (Eds.), Hand- book of enquiry & problem based learning. Galway: CELT.
Barrows, H. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x
Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 446–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20143
Bhattacharyya, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2009). Technology- integrated project-based approach in science education: A qualitative study of in-service teachers’ learning experiences. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 1–26. Bleicher, R. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: measuring self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 383–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18004.x
Bodzin, A. M. (2011, April). What do eighth grade students know about energy resources? Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Orlando, FL.
Bodzin, A., Fu, Q., & Peffer, T. (2012, January). Investigating curriculum enactment with a GT-supported science curriculum on students’ geospatial thinking and reasoning. Paper presented at the 2012 Association for Science Teacher Ed- ucation (ASTE) Annual Meeting. Clearwater Beach, FL.
Bodzin, A., Peffer, T. & Kulo, V. (2012, January). The impact of a geospatial technologies-integrated curriculum to promote energy literacy. Paper presented at the 2012 Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE) Annual Meet- ing. Clearwater Beach, FL.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Design, implementation, and evaluation of student-centered learning: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 79–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02319859
Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 14, 177–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025974417256
Carnegie Commission on Mathematics and Science Education. (2009). Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. Carnegie Corporation of New York/Institute for Advanced Study. http://opportunityequation.org/uploads/files/oe_report.pdf
Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Institute for Advanced Study. (2011). Growing opportunity. A two- year update on the Opportunity Equation: Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. http://opportunityequation.org/uploads/GrowingOpportunity_ATwo-YearUpdate.pdf
Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(3), 175–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009422728845
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derry, S. J., Siegel, M., Stampen, J. & the STEP Research Group. (2002). The STEP system for collaborative case-based teacher education: Design, evaluation and future directions. Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002 (pp. 209–216). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Enochs,L.G.,Posnanski,T.,&Hagedorn,E.(1999).Science teaching self-efficacy beliefs: Measurement, recent research, and directions for future research. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Education, Boston, MA.
Environmental Literacy and Inquiry Working Group. (2009). The energy resources content assessment. Retrieved from http://ei.lehigh.edu/eli/research/erca.pdf
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educa- tional Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006) Jumping the imple- mentation hurdle: Supporting PBL in K–12 classrooms. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 41–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 301–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320309
Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Fostering socio-scientific reasoning in problem-based learning: Examining teacher practice. International Journal of Learning, 16(12), 269–282.
Goodpaster, K., Adedokun, O., Kirkham, L., Ertmer, P., Clase, K., & Weaver, G. (2012, March). The impact of a professional development workshop on rural STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and biofuels knowledge. Paper accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of National Science Teacher Association, Indianapolis.
Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students’ perspectives with project-based learning. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 37–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1254
Grant, M. M., & Hill, J. (2006). Weighing the risks with the rewards: Implementing student-centered pedagogy within high-stakes testing. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability (pp. 19–42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_1
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2000). Knowledge recycling: Crisscrossing the landscape of educational psychology in a problem- based course for preservice teachers. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11(2&3), 41–56.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 22–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Khalick, F. (2006). Preservice and experienced biology teachers’ global and specific subject matter structures: implications for conceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1) 1–29. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from, http://www.ejmste.com/012006/ab1.htm
Khourey-Bowers, C., & Simonis, D. (2004). Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 175–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000047083.14197.b8
Kim, M. C., Ertmer, P. A., Fang, J., Kim, W., Tomory, A., & Freemyer, S. (2011, April). Challenges of facilitating technology-enhanced inquiry among high school students: A multiple case study. Paper presented at the annual conven- tion of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.
Kim, M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: A qualitative case study. Instructional Science, 39, 255–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9127-4
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, J. G., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem- based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
Liu, M. (2002). Alien Rescue: A problem-based hypermedia learning environment for middle school science. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 255–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/X531-D6KE-NXVY-N6RE
Liu, M., Horton, L., Olmanson, J. and Toprac, P. (2011) A study of learning and motivation in a new media enriched environment for middle school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 249–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9192-7
Lumpe, A., Haney, J., & Czerniak, C. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
Macdonald, R. (2005). Assessment strategies for enquiry and problem-based learning. In T. Barrett, I. MacLabhrainn & H. Fallon (Eds.), Handbook of enquiry & problem based learning. Galway: CELT.
Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N., & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(2), 49–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1026
Mollekopf, D. (2009). Creating highly qualified teachers: Maximizing university resources to provide professional development in rural areas. The Rural Educator, 30(3), 28–32.
Murray, I., & Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Staff development in problem-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 107–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135625100114993
National Academies. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of US fourth and eighth-grade students in an international context. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.edu.gov/timss
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indi- cators 2008. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashak- kori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351–383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Top of the class: High performers in science in PISA 2006. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/17/42645389.pdf
Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2007). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers’ beliefs regarding technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 247–267.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies to foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308221
Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the develop- ment of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Schunk, D. H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational perspec- tive (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Scaffolding disciplined inquiry in problem-based learning environments. International Journal of Learning, 12.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem-based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, imple- mentation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. In- terdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 12–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061
Walker, A., Recker, M., Robertshaw, M. B., Olsen, J., Leary, H. Ye, L., et al. (2011). Integrating technology and Problem- based Learning: A mixed methods study of two teacher professional development designs. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 70–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1255
Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1157– 1186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831211419491
Wyman, P. D. (2009). The interdisciplinary study of biofuels. Science Teacher, 76(2), 29–34.
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., McConnell, T. J., Koehler, M. J., & Edberhardt, J. (2010). Using questioning to facilitate discussion of science teaching problems in teacher professional development. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(1), 57–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1097
Zumbach, J., Kumpf, D. & Koch, S. (2004). Using multimedia to enhance problem-based learning in the elementary school. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2004(1), 25–37.