How to Enhance Interdisciplinary Competence—Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Learning versus Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Interdisciplinary competence is important in academia for both employability and sustainable development. However, to date, there are no specific interdisciplinary education models and, naturally, no empirical studies to assess them. Since problem-based learning (PBL) and project-based learning (PjBL) are learning approaches that emphasize students’ collaboration, both pedagogies seem suitable to enhance students’ interdisciplinary competence. Based on the principle of constructive alignment and four instructional principles on interdisciplinary learning, this paper proposes that students profit more from interdisciplinary PBL (iPBL) than interdisciplinary PjBL (iPjBL). A pre-post study was conducted with a sample of 95 students participating in iPBL and 183 students participating in iPjBL. As expected, multilevel models on students’ development in (a) interdisciplinary skills, (b) reflective behavior, and (c) recognizing disciplinary perspectives show that iPBL enhances students’ interdisciplinary competence more than iPjBL.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 271–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. S. (1980). Problem-based learning and approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Boix Mansilla, V. (2010). Learning to synthesize: The development of interdisciplinary understanding. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, C. Mitcham, & J. B. Holbtook (Eds), Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 288–306). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Boix Mansilla, V. (2016). Interdisciplinary learning: A cognitive-epistemological foundation. In R. Frodeman & J. Klein (Eds), Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.; pp. ). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Brandstädter, S., & Sonntag, K. H. (2016). Interdisciplinary collaboration—How to foster the dialogue across disciplinary borders? In B. Deml, P. Stock, R. Bruder, & C. Schlick (Eds.), Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes (pp. 395–409). Berlin, Germany: Springer Vieweg.
Braßler, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary problem-based learning—a student-centered pedagogy to teach social sustainable development in higher education. In W. Leal & P. Pace (Eds.), Teaching education for sustainable development at university level (pp. 245–257). Hamburg, Germany: Springer.
Braun, E., Gusy, B., Leidner, B., & Hannover, B. (2008). Das Berliner Evaluationsinstrument für selbstgeschätzte studentische Kompetenzen (BEvaKomp) [Competence- based course evaluation: Berlin Evaluation Instrument for students’ competences]. Diagnostica, 54, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.1.30
Braun, E., & Mishra, S. (2016). Methods for assessing competences in higher education: A comparative review. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Theory and Method in Higher Education Research Volume 2; pp. 47–68). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Braun, E. M. P., Sheikh, H., & Hannover, B. (2011). Self-rated competences and future vocational success: A longitudinal study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.534762
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal inter- group situation: A cognitive–motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6–11.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.
Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Kowalske, K. (2016). Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- Based Learning, 10(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1538
Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). Collaborative project-based learning and problem-based learning in higher education: A consideration of tutor and student role in learner-focused strategies. In G. O’Neill, S. Moore & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 87–98). Dublin: All Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE).
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1339
Epstein, S. L. (2005). Making interdisciplinary collaboration work. In S .J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Finkle, S. L., & Torp, L. L. (1995). Introductory documents. Aurora: Illinois Math and Science Academy.
Frodeman, R. (2014). The end of disciplinarity. In P. Weingart & B. Padberg (Eds.), University experiments in interdisciplinarity: Obstacles and opportunities (pp. 175–198). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.
Frost, S., & Jean, P. (2003). Bridging the disciplines: Interdisciplinary discourse and faculty scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 119–149.
Hambleton, R. K., & de Jong, J. H. A. L. (2003). Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests. Journal of Language Testing, 20(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt247xx
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education-theory, practice and rubber slings shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2012). International perspectives on problem-based learning: Contexts, cultures, challenges, and adaptations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1310
Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Imafuku, R., Kataoka, R., Mayahara, M., Suzuki, H., & Saiki, T. (2014). Students’ experiences in interdisciplinary problem-based learning: A discourse analysis of group interaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1388
Jeffrey, P. (2003). Smoothing the waters: Observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 33(4), 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312703334003
Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256
Kezar, A. (2005). Redesigning for collaboration within higher education institutions: An exploration into the develop- mental process. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 831–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6227-5
Khadri, H. O. (2014). A strategy for developing and enhancing interdisciplinary research and graduate education at Ain Shams University (ASU). European Scientific Journal, 10(28), 87–106.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1921). Dangers and difficulties of the project method and how to overcome them: Introductory statement: Definition of terms. Teachers College Record, 22(4), 283–287.
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Klein, J. T. (2006). A platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 10–18.
Kolmos, A. (1996). Reflections on project work and problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799608923397
Kolmos, A. (2016, June). Competence development with problem- and project-based learning. Keynote speech at 2016 Conference on Problem-Based Learning, “Promoting Competencies, Shaping the Future,” June 16–17, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R. G., & Holgaard, J. E. (2016). Response strategies for curriculum change in engineering. Interna- tional Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9319-y
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Larmer, J. (2014, January 6). Project-based learning vs. problem-based learning vs. X-BL. Buck Institute for Education. [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-vs-pbl-vs-xbl-john-larmer
Lattuca, L., Knight, D., & Bergom, I. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 726–739.
Lee, J. (2014). The integrated design process from the facilitator’s perspective. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 33(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2014.12000.x
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product team’s innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069415
Manathunga, C., Lant, P., & Mellick, G. (2006). Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680954
Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: Theoretical foundation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 221–238.
Maudsley, G. (1999). Do we all mean the same thing by “problem-based learning”? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Academic Medicine, 74(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199902000-00016
Newell, W. (2010). Undergraduate general education. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 360–371). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
P21. (2012). Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved September 13, 2016, from http://www.p21.org
Park, S., Cho, Y. Yoon, S. W., & Han, H. (2013). Comparing team learning approaches through the lens of activity theory. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(9), 788–810. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0048
Pecukonis, E., Doyle, O., & Bliss, D. L. (2008). Reducing barriers to interprofessional training: Promoting interprofessional cultural competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(4), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802190442
Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A., J., & Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: Theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/713699144
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibrium of cognitive structures. New York: Viking Press.
Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learn- ing: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
Schaeper, H. (2009). Development of competencies and teaching–learning arrangements in higher education: Findings from Germany. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 677– 697. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802669207
Schmidt, H. G., Henny, P. A., & de Vries, M. (1992) Comparing problem-based with conventional education: A review of the University of Limburg medical school experiment. Annals of Community-Oriented Education, 5, 193–198.
Schmidt, J. (2008). Toward a philosophy of interdisciplinarity—an attempt to provide a classification and clarification. Poiesis & Praxis, 5(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-007-0037-8
Shen, J., Sung, S., & Zhang, D. (2015). Toward an analytic framework of interdisciplinary reasoning and communication (IRC) processes in science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2809–2835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1106026
Solomon, P., & Salfi, J. (2011). Evaluation of an interprofessional education communication skills initiative. Education for Health, 24(2), 616–626.
Solomon, P., Salvatori, P., & Guenter, O. (2003). An interprofessional problem-based learning course on rehabilitation issues in HIV. Medical Teacher, 25(4), 408–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000137418
Spelt, E. J. H., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Luning, P. A., & Mul- der, M. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z
Spelt, E. J. H., Luning, P. A., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Mulder, M. (2015). Constructively aligned teaching and learning in higher education in engineering: What do students perceive as contributing to the learning of interdisciplinary thinking? European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(5), 459–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.987647
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published 1930, New York: Oxford University Press.)
Weinert, F. E. (2001a). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Weinert, F. E. (2001b). Competencies and key competencies: Educational perspective. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 4; pp. 2433–2436). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02384-6
Wheeler, R. (2008). Experiential learning: Impact of two instructional methods on student-instructor interaction, student critical thinking, and student course evaluations. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 12, 63–78.
Wilson, K., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381121
Woods, C. (2007). Researching and developing interdisci- plinary teaching: Toward a conceptual framework for classroom communication. Higher Education, 54(6), 853– 866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9027-3