Formative Assessment to Support Students’ Competences in Inquiry-Based Science Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Inquiry-based education has been part of innovative science teaching for the last few decades. With the competence orientation now underlying many national curricula, one of the emerging questions is how the development of student competences can be fostered in the context of inquiry-based science education. One approach to supporting students in their learning is formative assessment, which is, however, not frequently used in a structured way in daily teaching practice. The aim of this study therefore is to explore what kinds of measures might support science teachers in implementing formative assessment activities in their inquiry-based education. For this, firstly, we investigated the challenges that occur on a classroom level when using formative assessment methods in inquiry-based science education from teachers’ perspectives. Secondly, we analyzed the teachers’ suggestions on measures of support. Based on the respective results, this paper discusses implications for an implementation of structured formative assessment in inquiry-based science education to enhance student competences.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Abd El Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R. A., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.
Angelo, T., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment tech- niques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
ARG (Assessment Reform Group) (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. London: ARG.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry- based and cooperative learning. In L. Darling-Hammond, B. Barron, P. D. Pearson, A. H. Schoenfeld, E. K. Stage, T. D. Zimmermann, G. N. Cervetti, & J. Tilson (Eds.), Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 11–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553.
Bell, T., Urhahne , D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.
Belland, B. R., French, B. F., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). Validity and problem-based learning research: A review of instruments used to assess intended learning outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 59–89.
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: GL Assessment.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.
Burke, K. (2006). From standards to rubrics in 6 steps. Heatherton, Victoria: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Chudowsky, N., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2003). Large-scale assessments that support learning: What will it take? Theory into Practice, 42(1), 75–83.
Cizek, G. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G.J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3–17). New York: Routledge.
D-EDK Deutschschweizer Erziehungsdirektoren-Konferenz (2014). Lehrplan 21. Luzern: D-EDK.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.
Duschl, R. A. (2003). Assessment of inquiry. In J. M. Atkin & J. E. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 41–59). Arlington, VA: NSTA press.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New York: Routledge.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hume, A., & Coll, R. K. (2010). Authentic student inquiry: The mismatch between the intended curriculum and the student-experienced curriculum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 43–62.
Keeley, P. (2008). Science formative assessment. 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Looney, J. W. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? OECD Education Working Papers No. 58. Paris: OECD.
Mansell, W., James, M., & the Assessment Reform Group. (2009). Assessment in schools: Fit for purpose? A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: TLRP.
Maier, U. (2014). Formative Leistungsdiagnostik in der Sekundarstufe—Grundlegende Fragen, domänenspezifische Verfahren und empirische Befunde. In M. Haselhorn, W. Schneider, & U. Trautwein (Eds.), Lernverlaufsdiagnostik (pp. 19–40). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag.
Maier, U. (2015). Leistungsdiagnostik in schule und unterricht: Schülerleistungen messen, bewerten und fördern. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develop- ment (OECD) (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes: Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in education: Principles, policy and practice, 5(1), 85–102.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding of the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84.
Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measure- ment: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23–27.
Stiggins, R. J., Griswold, M. M., & Wikelund, K. R. (1989). Measuring thinking skills through classroom assessment, Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(3), 233–246.
Weiss, D., & Belland, B. R. (2016). Transforming schools using project-based learning, performance assessment, and Common Core standards. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2).
Wiliam, D. (2010). Research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). New York: Routledge.