DigiFab Kits: Mini Mobile Makerspace Design in the Arts Curriculum

Main Article Content

Aaron D. Knochel

Abstract

Artist educators work in a great diversity of locations from informal community spaces to formal learning spaces in schools and museums. Art educators are exploring modes of transdisciplinary curriculum connecting art to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEAM) to meet the diverse challenges of making and learning. One of the roadblocks to maker forms of education is access to digital fabrication technologies such as 3D printers. To bring digital fabrication to a wider range of arts learning contexts, I designed a mini mobile makerspace that focused on 3D printing that I am calling a DigiFab Kit. As an extension of the concept of the FabLab Classroom model, I share my design decisions and experience of 3D printing in a mobile framework. My development of DigiFab Kits is an exploration of curated object collections that deploy as mobile makerspaces with adaptable curricular concepts appropriate to technology that can be used anywhere there is electricity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Knochel, A. D. (2017). DigiFab Kits: Mini Mobile Makerspace Design in the Arts Curriculum. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i1.22663
Section
Makerspaces
Author Biography

Aaron D. Knochel, The Pennsylvania State University

Assistant Professor of Art Education

References

Bequette, J. W. & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47.

Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 203-222). Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.

Bosque, C. (2015). What are you printing: Ambivalent emancipation by 3D printing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(5), 572-579.

Craddock, I.L. (2015). Makers on the move: A mobile makerspace at a comprehensive public high school. Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 497-504.

de Boer, J. (2015). The business case of FryskLab, Europe’s first mobile library FabLab. Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 505-518.

Gierdowski, D. & Reis, D. (2015). The MobileMaker: An experiment with a mobile makerspace. Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 480-496.

Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Constantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12-19.

Honey, M. & Kanter, D. E. (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York, NY: Routledge.

IDEO. (2012). Design thinking for educators toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/DTtoolkit_v1_062711.pdf

Knochel, A. & Patton, R. (2015). If art education then critical digital making: Computational thinking and creative code. Studies in Art Education, 57(1), 21-38.

Martinez, S. L. & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.

Moorefield-Lang, H. M. (2015). When makerspaces go mobile: Case studies of transportable maker locations. Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 462-471.

Nicolescu, B. (1999) The transdisciplinary evolution of learning [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://basarab-nicolescu.fr/Docs_articles/AERA_April_1999.pdf

Strickfaden, M., & Heylighen, A. (2010). Cultural capital: A thesaurus for teaching design. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 29(2), 121-133.

Vande Zande, R. (2007). Design, form, and function in art education. Art Education, 60(4), 45-51.

Vande Zande, R. (2010). Teaching design education for cultural, pedagogical, and economic aims. Studies in Art Education, 51(3), 248-261.