The Unspace Case: Developing a Maker Movement in a Multipurpose, Flexible Space, Library Setting

Main Article Content

Craig Shepherd
Cassandra Kvenild
Shannon M. Smith
Alan Buss

Abstract

This paper presents the ongoing design, development, and implementation of a K-16 maker movement centered around a joint public school/university library whose minimal dedicated space has expanded opportunities for public participation, partnerships, and shared resources. As the library sought to circulate STEM resources for K-9 teachers and students in 2011, University instructors were seeking opportunities for preservice teachers to interact meaningfully with authentic, technology-rich environments. These separate endeavors coalesced over time to form a robust community of various school, university, and public stakeholders focused on mathematics and science learning. Because the space was not bound to a single physical location, proponents were able to leverage various resources, mobile tools, and settings to explore and apply STEM knowledge, construct products, and attract new and returning users. This design case articulates how the maker movement provides curricular programming while maintaining a playful atmosphere that encourages personal exploration regardless of age and ability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shepherd, C., Kvenild, C., Smith, S. M., & Buss, A. (2017). The Unspace Case: Developing a Maker Movement in a Multipurpose, Flexible Space, Library Setting. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i1.22658
Section
Makerspaces
Author Biographies

Craig Shepherd, University of Wyoming

Associate Professor of Instructional Technology

Cassandra Kvenild, University of Wyoming

Associate Librarian, Head of the Learning Resource Center

Shannon M. Smith, University of Wyoming

Library Specialist

Alan Buss, University of Wyoming

Associate Professor of Elementary Education

References

Ashburn, E.A., & Floden, R.E. (2006). Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do. New York: Teachers College Press.

Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone: The national science foundation has assembled a group of thought leaders to bring the concepts of computational thinking to the K-12 classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20.

Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a fieldbased teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(1), 57-72.

Butler, M., & Kvenild, C. (2014). Enhancing catalog records with photographs for a curriculum materials center. Technical Services Quarterly, 31(2), 122-138.

Cook, D. (2015, November). Leveling the playing field: Creating an emerging technology loan program. Paper presented at the Library and Information Technology Association Forum, Minneapolis, MN.

Dawson, K., & Dana, N. F. (2007). When curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences and teacher inquiry coalesce: An opportunity for conceptual change? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 656-667.

Dougherty, D. (2013). The Maker Mindset. In M. Honey & D. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7-11). New York: Routledge.

Fisher, K., Sedik, S. & Zhao, B. (2016, June). Circulating STEM kits for youth: Getting to the root of the matter. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Library Association, Orlando, FL.

International Society for Technology in Education (2007). ISTE Standards for Students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/standards-for-students

Meagher, M., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Edwards, M. T. (2011). Preservice teachers' experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a preservice classroom and in field placements. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243-270.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Nathan, R. (2005). My freshman year: What a professor learned by becoming a student. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.

Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N. Eccles, J., Gomez, L., Klahr, D., Linn, M., Miller, K., & Mix, K. (2009). Psychology’s role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist, 64, 538-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014813

Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York: Marlowe.

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K., & Newby, T. (2010). Preservice technology integration course revision: A conceptual guide. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5-33.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Shepherd, C. E. (2015a, March 10). [Meeting notes for the technology club in the Learning Resource Center]. Unpublished raw data.

Shepherd, C. E. (2015b, April 27). [Meeting notes for the technology club in the Learning Resource Center]. Unpublished raw data.

Shepherd, C. E. (2015c, October 6). [Meeting notes for the technology club in the Learning Resource Center]. Unpublished raw data.

Shepherd, C. E., Dousay, T., Kvenild, C, & Meredith, T. (2015). Fostering technology-rich serving learning experiences between school librarians and teacher education programs. Knowledge Quest, 44(2), 44-52.

Wepner, S. B., Bowes, K. A., & Serotkin, R. S. (2007). Technology in teacher education: Creating a climate of change and collaboration. Action in Teacher Education, 29(1), 81-93.