Examining the connection between classroom technology and student engagement
Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
Benson, D. E., T. E. Ore and W. Haney (2002). Digital Technologies and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 30, 140-157. doi: 10.2307/3211379
Berrett, D. (2012). How 'Flipping' the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-theClassroom/130857/
Biemiller, L. (2011). Atlanta Colleges Strive to Outrun the Recession: Region's 11-percent unemployment means layoffs and scholarship cuts. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/article-content/129487/
Blackie, M. A. L., J. M. Case and J. Jawitz (2010). Student-centredness: the link between transforming students and transforming ourselves. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 637646. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.491910
Breen, R. R. A. P. (2001). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in a University Learning Environment. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 95-114. doi: 10.1080/03075070123233
Cameron, A. C. and P. K. Trivedi (2009). Microeconometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Carnell, E. (2007). Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: extending the boundaries. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 25-40. doi: 10.1080/13562510601102081
Chickering, A. W. and Z. F. Gamson (1999). Development and Adaptations of the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75-81. doi: 10.1002/tl.8006
Clark-Ibáñez, M. and L. Scott (2008). Learning to Teach Online. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 3441. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0803600105
Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press.
DiStefano, C., M. Zhu and D. Mîndrilă (2009). Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1-11.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom Learning Environments: Retrospect, Context and Prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education 24, 1191-1239. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_79
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2012). Renewing the Commitment. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Renewing-the-Commitment/132645/
Grasha, A. F. and N. Yangarber-Hicks (2000). Integrating Teaching Styles and Learning Styles with Instructional Technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2-10. doi: 10.1080/87567550009596080
Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2010). Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect : how computers affect our children's minds--for better and worse. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Hill, A., T. Arford, A. Lubitow and L. M. Smollin (2012). “I’m Ambivalent about It”. Teaching Sociology, 40(3), 242-256. doi: 10.1177/0092055X12444071
Hoop, K. C. (2012). Comte Unplugged. Teaching Sociology, 40(2), 158-165. doi: 10.1177/0092055X12437973
Howard, J. R. (2005). An Examination of Student Learning in Introductory Sociology at a Commuter Campus. Teaching Sociology, 33(2), 195-205. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0503300206
Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 349-363. doi: 10.1080/13562510701278690
Hung, H.-T. and S. C.-Y. Yuen (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703-714. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507307
Junco, R. H. G. L. E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Koeber, C. (2005). Introducing Multimedia Presentations and a Course Website to an Introductory Sociology Course: How Technology Affects Student Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness. Teaching Sociology, 33(3), 285-300. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0503300309
Koeber, C. and D. W. Wright (2008). On the Outside Teaching in. Teaching Sociology, 36(4), 331-343. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0803600403
Kuh, G. D., T. M. Cruce, R. Shoup, J. Kinzie and R. M. Gonyea (2008). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540-563. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0019
Kuh, G. D. and N. Vesper (2001). Do Computers Enhance or Detract from Student Learning? Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 87-102. doi: 10.1023/A:1018768612002
Little, C. B., L. Titarenko and M. Bergelson (2005). Creating a Successful International Distance-Learning Classroom. Teaching Sociology, 33(4), 355-370. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0503300402
MacIsaac, D. L. and K. A. Falconer (2001). RTOP Workshops for Physics Teachers. AAPT National Summer Meetings.
MacIsaac, D. L. and K. A. Falconer (2002). Reforming Physics Education Via RTOP. The Physics Teacher, 40(8), 479-485. doi: 10.1119/1.1526620
McCain, T. D. E. and I. Jukes (2001). Windows on the future : education in the age of technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mollborn, S. and A. Hoekstra (2010). “A Meeting of Minds”. Teaching Sociology, 38(1), 18-27. doi: 10.1177/0092055X09353890
Morris, R. C., Parker, L. C., Nelson, D., Pistilli, M., Hagen, A., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Weaver, G. (Forthcoming). Development of a Student Self-Reported Instrument to Assess Course Reform.
Pearson, A. F. (2010). Real Problems, Virtual Solutions. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 207-214. doi: 10.1177/0092055X10370115
Peel, D. (2005). Peer observation as a transformatory tool?1. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 489-504. doi: 10.1080/13562510500239125
Persell, C. H. (2004). Using Focused Web-Based Discussions to Enhance Student Engagement and Deep Understanding. Teaching Sociology, 32(1), 61-78. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0403200107
Persell, C. H., K. M. Pfeiffer and A. Syed (2008). How Sociological Leaders Teach. Teaching Sociology, 36(2), 108-124. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0803600202
Piburn, M., D. Sawada, K. Falconer, J. Turley, R. Benford and I. Bloom (2000). Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP).
Pippert, T. D. and H. Moore (1999). Multiple Perspectives on Multimedia in the Large Lecture. Teaching Sociology, 27(2), 92-109. doi: 10.2307/1318697
Sawada, D., M. Piburn, E. Judson, J. Turley, K. Falconer, R. Benford and I. Bloom (2002). Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245-253. doi: 10.1111/j.19498594.2002.tb17883.x
Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83-94.
Snyder, T. D. and S. A. Dillow (2011). Digest of Education Statistics. The National Center for Education Statistics. Retreaived from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012001.pdf
Thomas, A. (2012). Campus Technology magazine picks Hotseat, DoubleTake and Mixable as top innovations for 2012. Purdue Exponent.
Thomas, F. N. L. and G. D. Kuh (2005). Student Experiences with Information Technology and Their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211-233. doi: 10.1007/s11162-004-1600-y
Transformation, T. N. C. f. A. (2012). "Who We Are." Retrieved July 18, 2012, from http://www.thencat.org/whoweare.html.
Williams-June, A. (2009). Budget Cuts and 'Workload Creep'. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/More-Work-Can-Mean-Less-Joy-in/48309/
Williams, J. J. (2012). Deconstructing Academe: The birth of critical university studies. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Emerging-Field-ofCritical/131158/
Wolff, J. (2012). Graduate student teachers should demand professional status. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/mar/26/postgraduate-grad-student-teacher-universit
Wolin, R. (2012). Fading Glory Days. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Fading-Glory-Days/132633/
Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A Self-regulated Learning Perspective on Student Engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 635-651), New Yor, NY: Springer US.
Wright, E. R. and A. H. Lawson (2005). Computer Mediated Communication and Student Learning in Large Introductory Sociology Classes. Teaching Sociology, 33(2), 122-135. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0503300201
Young, J. R. (2012). Customization Is the Future of Teaching, Harvard Researcher Says. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Future-of-Teaching-/132493/