Student Perceptions of Classroom Engagement and Learning using iPads
Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
Annansingh, F., & Bright, A. (2010). Exploring barriers to effective E-learning: Case study of DNPA. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7, 55-65. doi:10.1108/17415651011031653
Axelson, R.D., & Flick, A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43, 38-43.
Carini, R.M., Kuh, J.D., & Klein, S.P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
Chen, P.S.D., Lambert, A.D., & Guidry, K.R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 12221232.
Chyung, S.Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8 (3), 213-222.
Fischman, J., & Keller, J. (2011). College tech goes mobile. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58, 50.
Githens, R.P. (2007). Older adults and e-learning: Opportunities and barriers. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 329-338.
Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations. New York: Routledge.
Jones, S., & Fox, S. (2009). Generations online in 2009. Pew Internet Research Project. Retreived from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations-Online-in-2009.aspx
Kane, Y. (2010, June 1). Apple s iPad sales pass two-million mark. Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition, p. B7.
Kinzie, J. (2010). Student engagement and learning: Experiences that matter. In Taking Stock: Research on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (139-153). J. Christensen Hughes & J. Mighty (Eds.), Kingston, Canada: School of Policy Studies, Queens University at Kingston.
Kuh, G.K. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nelson Laird, T.F., & Kuh, G.D. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211-233.
Parker, R.E., Bianchi, A., & Cheah, T. (2008). Perceptions of instructional technology: Factors of influence and anticipated consequences. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 274-293.
Pike. G.R., Kuh, G.D., & McCormick, A.C. (2008, November). Learning community participation and educational outcomes: Direct, indirect, and contingent relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Jacksonville, FL.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Marcprensky.com. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Rice, A. (2011, October 18). Colleges take varied approaches to iPad experiments, with mixed results. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/colleges-take-varied-approaches-to-ipad-experiments-with-mixed-results/33749
Rovai, A.P., & Baker, J.D. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 31-44.
Sherr, I. (2011, August 12). Tablet war is an Apple route. Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition, p. B1-B2.
Tallent-Runnels, M.K., Thomas, J.A., Lan, W.Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T.C., Shaw, S.M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93-135.
Thompson, L.F., & Lynch, B.J. (2003). Web-based instruction: Who is inclined to resist it and why? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 375-385.
Wang, Y.S., Wu, M.C., & Wang, H.Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 4(1), 92–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
Wieder, B. (2011). iPads could hinder teaching, professors say. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(28), A22-A23. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/iPads-for-College-Classrooms/126681/
Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12–22.