Ready for Equity? A Cross-Cultural Organizational Framework to Scale Access to Learning-Ready Classrooms That Support Student Success

Main Article Content

Teggin Summers
Maggie Beers


Abstract: There is a national urgency in higher-education to close the achievement gap and increase graduation rates for first generation, low-income and underrepresented minorities, and classroom environments are integral to student learning experience. The authors propose shifting learning space discussions away from building an historically small number of active learning spaces, towards a larger number of what they term “learning-ready classrooms,” which apply universal design principles to support the multiple teaching identities and philosophies of faculty and the physiological, cultural, and cognitive needs of all students. Equitable access to learning-ready classrooms means they must be built at scale, so it is imperative to earn campus-wide commitment to this goal by honoring the multiple perspectives and priorities of members of all six cultures of the academy, as identified by Berquist (1992) and Berquist and Pawlak (2008). This article proposes a cross-cultural organizational framework, embodied in the example of a Classroom Readiness Committee (CRC) charter, that unites and aligns the different organizational perspectives of its members through clearly articulated mission, vision, functions and belief statements. Preliminary findings suggest that institutions can engage and mobilize multiple stakeholders towards the common goal of providing equitable access to learning-ready classrooms as long as the goal aligns with the core values and priorities of the institution, is clearly articulated and communicated, and honors the perspectives of the six cultures of the academy.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Summers, T., & Beers, M. (2019). Ready for Equity? A Cross-Cultural Organizational Framework to Scale Access to Learning-Ready Classrooms That Support Student Success. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 8(1), 76–86.
Case Study


Beers, M. & Summers, T. (2018, May-June). Educational equity and the classroom: Designing learning-ready Spaces for all students. EDUCAUSE Review, 53(3), 54-55.

Bergquist, W.H. (1992). The four cultures of the academy: Insights and strategies for improving leadership in collegiate organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Bergquist, W. H., & Pawlak, K. (2008). Engaging the six cultures of the academy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

California State University. (2018). Redefining historically underserved students in the CSU: Moving beyond race and economic status to close equity gaps. Retrieved from

Couper, L. (2019). Student success in the classroom: Environmental factors that affect well-being (Unpublished master’s thesis). San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.

Gutek, G. L. (2014). Philosophical, ideological, and theoretical perspectives on education (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.

Holy, T. (1961). California's master plan for higher education, 1960-1975: A factual presentation of an important development. The Journal of Higher Education, 32(1), 9-16.

Johnson, H., Mejia, M. C., & Bohn, S. (2015, October). Will California run out of college graduates? (Public Policy Institute of California report). Retrieved from

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Commissioned Report for the National Symposium on Postsecondary Student Success). Retrieved from

North Carolina State University Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design (Version 2.0). Retrieved from

Olsen, B. (2008). How reasons for entry into the profession illuminate teacher identity development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3).

Pratt, D. D. (2002). Good teaching: One size fits all? New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93 (pp.5-16).

Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In P.M. Denicolo, & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting Policy and Practice: Challenges for Teaching and Learning in Schools and Universities (pp. 5-21). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

San Francisco State University. (2017, April). Student success plan. Retrieved from

San Francisco State University. (2018). Classroom readiness committee charter. San Francisco, CA: Author.

Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Whitford, E. (2018, October). Maximizing student success for first-gen college students. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from