Technological Innovation or Educational Evolution? A Multi-disciplinary Qualitative Inquiry into Active Learning Classrooms
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, many institutions have transformed traditional classrooms (TCs) into technology-rich active learning classrooms (ALCs) to accommodate the pedagogical concept of “active learning”. In order to investigate the impact of ALCs on teaching and teaching, we observed an instructor teaching in an ALC for an entire academic year, audio/video-recorded every class and took field notes. A focus group discussion was conducted with faculty from six allied health disciplines who taught weekly classes in the ALC and an online survey was distributed to students who took those classes. Data was then analysed using a qualitative constant comparative method (CCM). Findings indicated that the ALC generated greater teaching and learning enjoyment, deepened engagement, amplified interaction, enhanced group activity efficiency and fostered the development of creative ideas. All these features were interrelated and created a synergistic effect on student learning.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
AAC Task Group on General Education. (1988). A new vitality in general education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
Adler, M. J. (1982). The Paideia proposal: an education manifesto. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., . . . Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (L. W. Anderson & D. R. Krathwohl Eds.). New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Auster, E. R., & Wylie, K. K. (2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: a systematic approach. Journal of Management Education, 30(2).
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom Contexts for Creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53-69. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1031196&site=ehost-live. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
Beichner, R. J., & Saul, J. M. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project. The Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi", 1-17. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncsu.edu%2Fper%2FArticles%2FVarenna_SCALE UP_Paper.pdf&ei=zHFLVZqFIL4gwTp0IHwCA&usg=AFQjCNFRNfi9SrvuEU8g_MNOJqeSlE5t4Q&bvm=bv.92765956,d.eXY
Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J., Deardorff, D., Allain, R. J., Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALEUP) project. Research-based Reform of University Physics, 1(1), 2-39. Retrieved from http://www.percentral.com/PER/per_reviews/media/volume1/SCALE-UP-2007.pdf
Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Allain, R. J., Deardorff, D. L., & Abbott, D. S. (2000). Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED459062&site=ehostlive
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington D. C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education - Eric Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719-726. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2011-18319002&site=ehost-live
Brooks, D. C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behavior (Vol. 1).
Brooks, D. C., & Solheim, C. A. (2014). Pedagogy Matters, Too: The Impact of Adapting Teaching Approaches to Formal Learning Environments on Student Learning. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2014(137), 53-61. doi:10.1002/tl.20085
Chapman, P., & Blemings, K. (2006). Improving retention rates in biochemistry: a quasi experiment. Radical Pedagogy, 1(8).
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1044018&site=ehost-live
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
Coates, H. B. (2008). Attracting, engaging and retaining: new conversations about learning. Australasian Student Engagement Report. Retrieved from https://www.acer.org/files/AUSSE_Australasian-Student-Engagement-Report-ASER-2007.pdf
Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). “It’s not you, it’s the room”— Are the High-Tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82-88. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.umn.edu/sites/default/files/public/downloads/JCSTJuly2013.pdf
Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age. England: Trentham Books Ltd.
Cross, P. K. (1987). Teaching for learning. AAHE Bulletin 39, 3-7.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the Gifted and Talented. Fifth Edition.
de Alencar, E. M. L. S., & de Oliveira, Z. M. F. (2016). Creativity in Higher Education According to Graduate Programs' Professors. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 555-560. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1092350&site=ehost-live
Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with LectureBased and Problem-Based Instructional Approaches. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 310-322. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=79816985&site=ehost-live
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technolgoy-enabled active learning affect undergraudate studetns understanding of electromagentism concepts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/edtech/casestudies/pdf/teal1.pdf
Dori, Y. J., Belcher, J., Bessette, M., Danziger, M., McKinney, A., & Hult, E. (2003). Technology for active learning. Materials Today(6), 44-49. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/edtech/casestudies/pdf/teal2.pdf
Dupin-Bryant, P. A. (2004). Teaching Styles of Interactive Television Instructors: A Descriptive Study. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 39-50. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ683297&site=ehost-live
Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (1998). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. V. Comparisons with traditionally taught students. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 469-480.
Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
Graetz, K. A. (2006). The psychology of learning environments. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(6), 60-75. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/psychology-learning-environments
Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic Engagement: Current Perspectives in Research and Practice. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 328. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=7462498&site=ehost-live
Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L., & Limb, C. (2013). Building creative thinking in the classroom: From research to practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 43-50. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.003
Gregory, M. R. (2002). Constructivism, standards, and the classroom community of inquiry. Educational Theory, 52(4), 397-408.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, K. (2013). Facilitating Cooperative Learning in Online and Blended Courses: An Example from an Integrated Marketing Communications Course. American Journal of Business Education, 6(1), 33-40. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1054191&site=ehost-live
Koh, C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Liu, W. C., & Ee, J. (2009). Bridging the Gaps Between Students' Perceptions of Group Project Work and Their Teachers' Expectations. Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 333-348. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=37591671&site=ehost-live
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know about Student Engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6-), 683-706. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ868898&site=ehost-live
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.
Legters, N., Balfanz, R., & McPartland, J. (2002). Solutions for Failing High Schools: Converging Visions and Promising Models. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED466942&site=ehost-live
Long, P. D., & Ehrmann, S. C. (2005). Future of the learning space - breaking out of the box. EDUCAUSE Review(July/August), 42-58. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0542.pdf
Lowman, J. (1984). Mastering the techniques of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
National Institute of Education. (1984). Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education. Final Report of the Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED246833&site=ehost-live
Oblinger, D. G. (2005). Leading the transition from classroom to learning spaces: the convergence of technology, pedagogy and space can lead to existing new models of campus interaction. Educause Quarterly, 1, 14-18.
Park, E., & Choi, B. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749-771. doi:10.1007/s10734-0149742-0
Penner, J. G. (1984). Why many college teachers cannot lecture. Springrfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.
Perie, M., Moran, R., Lutkus, A. D., & National Center for Education Statistics, W. D. C. E. T. S. W. D. C. (2005). The Nation's Report Card. NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance in Reading, 1971-2004 and Mathematics, 1973-2004. NCES 2005?464. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED485627&site=ehost-live
Physical Education R&D Group. (2011). SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Active Learning Enviroment with Upside-down Pedagogies). Retrieved from http://scaleup.ncsu.edu/
Piaget, J. (2013). Construction of reality in the child. [Place of publication not identified]: Routledge.
Ryan, M. P., & Martens, G. G. (1989). Planning a College Course: A Guidebook for the Graduate Teaching Assistant. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Smith, C. V., & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is Active Learning Like Broccoli? Student Perceptions of Active Learning in Large Lecture Classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53-61. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ915923&site=ehost-live
Steuter, E., & Doyle, J. (2010). Revitalizing the first year class through student engagement and discovery learning. The Journal of Effective Learning, 10(1), 66-78.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swaray, R. (2012). An Evaluation of a Group Project Designed to Reduce Free-Riding and Promote Active Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 285-292. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ962340&site=ehost-live
Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis'placement' of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502-511.
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faulty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153-184.
Vygotskiĭ, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge :: Harvard University Press.
Walker, J. D., Brooks, D. C., & Baepler, P. (2011). Pedagogy and Space: Empirical Research in New Learning Environments. Educause Quarterly, 34(4). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/pedagogy-and-space-empirical-research-new-learningenvironments
Wesch, M. (2007). A vision of students today. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGCJ46vyR9o
Whiteside, A., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on learning environments. Educause Quarterly, 33. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/making-case-space-three-years-empirical-research-learningenvironments
Whiteside, A. L., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the Case for Space: Three Years of Empirical Research on Learning Environments. Educause Quarterly, 33(3). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ901495&site=ehostlive
Whiteside, A. L., Jorn, L., Duin, A. H., & Fitzgerald, S. (2009). Using the PAIR-up Model to Evaluate Active Learning Spaces. Educause Quarterly, 32(1). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ850616&site=ehost-live
Williams, K. H., Childers, C., & Kemp, E. (2013). Stimulating and Enhancing Student Learning Through Positive Emotions. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 13(3), 209-227.