Deep and lifelong learning: When theory and SoTL intersect

Main Article Content

Jane West


In this reflective essay, a teacher educator describes her own transformation that occurred as a result of studying adult learning theory along with a group of doctoral students. In examining her habits of course design, she realized that her practices had departed from her ideals and that her course planning was guided as much by pragmatic schedule demands as by the conceptual development of her students. As a result, she redesigned her course in language and literacy for preservice teachers. After describing the existing course, the author relates how her thinking—and the course—were transformed by the intersection of three influences:  her   encounter with Ramsden’s (2003) androgogical theory of teaching and learning, her familiarity with a discipline-specific pedagogical theory, and her SoTL research on students’ needs as learners. Guided by these influences, she reconceptualized the language and literacy course with a renewed focus on the social constructivist goals of facilitating conceptual change through meaning-oriented approaches. The author attempts to make visible to the reader exactly how she made this transition to address both the theoretical and the practical dimensions of the course, rediscovering in the process the transformation that is possible when teacher education focuses as on the why as well as the how of teaching.



Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
West, J. (2013). Deep and lifelong learning: When theory and SoTL intersect. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(4), 11–20. Retrieved from
Author Biography

Jane West, Mercer University

Associate Professor, Tift College of Education, Mercer University


Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Calkins, L. M. (1994). The art of teaching writing (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Cambourne, B. L. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy. Auckland, New Zealand: Ashton-Scholastic.

Cambourne, B. (1995). Toward an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 49(3), 182-190.

The Chronicle of Higher Education (n.d.). Washington, D.C. Retrieved from

Fletcher, R., & Portalupi, J. (2001). Writing workshop: The essential guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Harwayne, S. (2001). Writing through childhood: Rethinking process and product. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Kegan, R. (2009). What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists. . .in their own words (pp. 35-52). London: Routledge.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. London, England: Cambridge University Press.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.