Iteration in an Inquiry-Based Undergraduate Laboratory Strengthens Student Engagement and Incorporation of Scientific Skills
Main Article Content
Abstract
The advantages of active learning approaches have prompted national recommendations for the development of inquiry-based laboratories to replace traditional laboratory classes. However, there is little consensus for the most-effective implementation strategies. Frequently, a single inquiry-based exercise is incorporated at the end of a traditional course and students have little opportunity to repeat the experience before moving on to new courses. To test whether multiple-rounds of inquiry would be beneficial, we incorporated three rounds of inquiry-based experiments during a redesign of a traditional upper-level undergraduate developmental biology laboratory class. After the second and third round of inquiry, students gave slideshow presentations of their projects and received peer and instructor feedback. We then designed and validated a scoring rubric to assess student use of scientific skills. Substantial improvements were observed in five of seven categories of scientific skills when comparing student performance from the third round of projects to the second round. Surprisingly, prior knowledge of the rubric did not diminish these gains. Anecdotal evidence and responses to student questionnaires revealed substantial levels of student interest and engagement in the course. Overall, these results indicate that incorporating iterative rounds of inquiry-based laboratories is a promising strategy for teaching scientific skills, enhancing student engagement, and promoting learning.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.