Main Article Content
This project evaluated the effectiveness of a course design within an upper-level biology course that incorporated what prior scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) research has suggested to be best practices for developing critical thinking skills while also managing the grading load on the instructor. These efforts centered on the development of a clearly articulated subset of skills identified by the Critical Thinking Assessment Test (CAT) as well as incorporated learning experiences designed to instill what we refer to as a “habit of critical investigation.” In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a single semester of an aligned course utilizing active learning and multiple opportunities for practice and feedback would: (a) increase the extent to which students agreed with the importance of questioning the credibility of claims across the semester, (b) increase the frequency at which students reported personally questioning the credibility of claims across the semester, (c) increase the number of students reporting investigation techniques consistent with critical investigation across the semester and (d) result in significantly greater student performance on the CAT questions that assessed the sub-skills practiced in the course when compared to the performance of a representative group of senior students at our institution. We observed substantial and significant gains in both the frequency at which students reported questioning claims and the degree to which their reported investigative actions were consistent with critical investigation. Furthermore, on the critical thinking sub-skills most aligned with what was practiced in the course, the experimental group significantly outperformed the comparison group.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3448076
Bok, D. (2006). Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: the Effects of TaskInvolving and Ego-Involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning. (2016). Critical Thinking Assessment Test. Retrieved June 7, 2016, from https://www.tntech.edu/cat/
Cohen, A. S. (1987). Instructional Alignment: Searching for a Magic Bullet. Educational R, 16(8). http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X016008016
De L’Etoile, S. K. (2008). Applying Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years to Undergraduate Music Therapy Education. Music Therapy Perspectives, 26(2), 110–116. http://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/26.2.110
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking : A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/DEXadobe.PDF
Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating Significant Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Frisch, B. J. K., Jackson, P. C., & Murray, M. C. (2013). WikiED: Using Web 2.0 Tools to Teach Content and Critical Thinking. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(1).
Gasper, B. J., & Gardner, S. M. (2013). Engaging Students in Authentic Microbiology Research in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Course is Correlated with Gains in Student Understanding of the Nature of Authentic Research and Critical Thinking. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 14(1), 25–34. http://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.460
Halpern, D. (1998). Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer Across Domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.
Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving students’ critical thinking: Empirical support for explicit instructions combined with practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 518–530. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3025
Jones, S., Noyd, R., & Sagendorf, K. (2014). Building a Pathway to Student Learning. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002
Ozturk, C., Muslu, G. K., & Dicle, A. (2008). A comparison of problem-based and traditional education on nursing students’ critical thinking dispositions. Nurse Education Today, 28(5), 627–632. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.10.001
Perkins, D., & Ritchhart, R. (2004). When is good thinking? In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the Wild. Educational Psychology Review.
Ritchhart, R. (2015). Creating cultures of thinking. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stein, B., Haynes, A., & Redding, M. (2006). Project CAT: Assessing Critical Thinking Skills. Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment Conference, 290–299.
Tayyeb, R. (2013). Effectiveness of problem based learning as an instructional tool for acquisition of content knowledge and promotion of critical thinking among medical students. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 23(1), 42–46. http://doi.org/01.2013/jcpsp.4246
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding By Design. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Chou, H. A. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666–684. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00767.x
Yu, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Wu, J., & Wang, C. (2013). Improvement in Critical Thinking Dispositions of Undergraduate Nursing Students Through Problem?Based Learning: A Crossover-Experimental Study. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10). http://doi.org/10.3928/01484834
Yuan, H., Williams, B. A., & Fan, L. (2008). A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students’ critical thinking through problem-based learning. Nurse Education Today, 28(6), 657–663. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.12.006