Peer partnerships in teaching: Evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Barnard, A., Croft, W., Irons, R., Cuffe, N., Bandara, W., & Rowntree, P. (2011). Peer partnership to enhance scholarship of teaching: A case study. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 435-448. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.518953
Beaty, L. (1998). The professional development of teachers in higher education: structures methods and responsibilities. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 99107.
Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55, 735–752. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: A programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6, 29-39. doi:10.1080/13601440110033643
Bell, M. (2002). Peer observation of teaching in Australia. LTSN Generic Centre. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/resource_database/id28_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching_in_Australia.
Bell, M. (2005). Peer observation partnerships in higher education. NSW: HERDSA.
Britt, N. (1982). Faculty attitudes about colleague evaluation of teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 5034A.
Crisp, G., Sadler, R., Krause, K-L., Buckridge, M., Wills, S., Brown, C., et al. (2009). Peer Review of Teaching for Promotion Purposes: a project to develop and implement a pilot program of external Peer Review of Teaching at four Australian universities. Final Project Report, ALTC.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: is peer-observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489_503.
Harris, K-L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (2008). Peer Review of Teaching in Australian Higher Education: A handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices. Available at http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/PeerReviewHandbook_eVersion.pdf.
Hutchings, P. (1994). Peer review of teaching: from idea to prototype. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 44, 3–7.
Keig, L. (2000). Formative peer review of teaching: Attitudes of faculty at liberal arts colleges toward colleague assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 67-87. doi:10.1023/A:1008194230542.
Kell, C., & Annetts, S. (2009). Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy-holding complacency? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 61-70. doi:10.1080/14703290802646156.
Lomas, L., & Nicholls, G. (2005). Enhancing teaching quality through peer review of teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 11, 137-149. doi:10.1080/13538320500175118.
McMahon, T., Barrett, T., & O’Neill, G. (2007). Using observation of teaching to improve quality: finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 499-511.
Martin, G., & Double, J. (1998). Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 161-169.
Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Fransisco: Jossey–Bass.
Shortland, S. (2004). Peer-observation: a tool for staff development or compliance? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2), 219-228.
Slade, C. (2002). Sharing excellence: a dissemination model. Learning and Teaching Support Network, Generic Centre. Available online at: www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources (accessed 9 August 2006).
Wood, D., et al. (2008). Peer review of online learning and teaching. Final Project Report, ALTC. Available at http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/peerreview.