Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Albert, S. (2010). The evolution of retention. Educational Solutions, 2010 (7), 16-17.
Bogusz, G. and Gauthier, L. (2012). Promoting lifelong learning in women’s federal correctional programs: A communities of practice approach. In S. Brigham (Ed), Proceedings of the 31st National Conference of Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education, 26-32.
Bowering, E. and Merritt, A. (2006). Evaluation of the MSVU Student Success Course. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.msvu.ca/site/media/msvu/eval2006.pdf
Brookfield, S. D. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cranton, P. A. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2002 (93), 63-72.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for “Neomillennial” learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In D. Oblinger and J. Oblinger (Eds), Educating the Net Generation. (pp. 15.1-15.22). Washington, DC: Educause.
Fancey, P. (2000). Student Success Course: Evaluation results. Retrieved from http://www.msvu.ca/site/media/msvu/eval2000.pdf
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. and Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (3), 641–653.
Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Toronto, ON: Random House.
Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2007). Millennials go to college. Great Falls, VA: LifeCourse Associates.
Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists ... In Their Own Words, (pp. 200- 208), New York, NY: Routledge.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mezirow, J. and Taylor, E. (2009). Transformative learning in practice insights from community, workplace, and higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moxley, D., Najor-Durack, A. and Dumbrigue, C. (2013). Keeping students in higher education: Successful practices and strategies for retention. New York, NY: Routledge.
Oblinger, D. G. (2003). Boomers, gen-xers, and millennials: Understanding the “new students.” EDUCAUSE Review, 38 (4), 36-40.
Skiba, D. and Barton, A. (2006). Adapting Your Teaching to Accommodate the Net Generation of Learners. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2). Retrieved October, 11, 2012 http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/Ta bleofContents/Volume112006/No2May06/tpc30_416076.aspx
Sowell, E. J. (2005). Curriculum: An integrative introduction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Taylor, E. W. (2000). Fostering Mezirow’s transformative learning theory in the adult education classroom: A critical review. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 14 (2), 128.
Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wenger, E. C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2006, June). Communities of practice. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm
Wenger, E. C. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists ... In Their Own Words, (pp. 209-218), New York, NY: Routledge
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A. and Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Wilson, A. and Cervero, R. (1996). Learning from practice: Learning to see what matters in program planning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1996 (69), 91-99.
Wilson, A. and Cervero, R. (1997). The song remains the same: The selective tradition of technical rationality in adult education program planning theory. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 16 (2), 84-108.
Wilson, M. E. (2004). Teaching, learning, and millennial students. New Directions for Student Services, 2004 (106), 59-71.
Yorke, M. and Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.