Undergraduate Students’ Perspectives of Essential Instructor Qualities

Main Article Content

Beth Trammell
Rosalie Aldrich


Preferences for who an instructor is and how he or she behaves have a substantial impact on a student’s overall experience in the college classroom. There are many variables that impact a classroom experience including the instructor, the student, and the class itself. Much research has been done in the area of undergraduate student expectations and preferences for instructors, course format, etc. This paper explores how specific student characteristics such as first-generation status, and age together with class level and format impact students’ perception of what makes a good instructor. By understanding what instructor qualities these students appreciate, instructors can tailor their behavior to improve student learning and retention. Results suggest few differences within and between these groups of students. However, students had strong preferences for a high number of positive instructor characteristics, suggesting the possibility of overly optimistic and unrealistic preferences. Implications of this and suggestions for how instructors can better accommodate the preferences of students are discussed.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Trammell, B., & Aldrich, R. (2016). Undergraduate Students’ Perspectives of Essential Instructor Qualities. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19178


Adamson, G., D. O’Kane, & M. Shevlin. (2005). Students’ ratings of teaching effectiveness: A laughing matter? Psychological Reports 96, 225-226.

Andreson, L. (2000), “Teaching development in higher education as scholarly practice: A reply to Rowland et al. turning academics into teachers”, Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 23-31.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(6), 12-26.

Blose, G. (1999). Modeled retention and graduation rates: Calculating expected retention and graduation rates for multicampus university systems. New directions for higher education, 1999(108), 69-86.

Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer, 27-39.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Retrieved from: http://www.aahea.org/articles/sevenprinciples1987.htm on March 25, 2015.

Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in firstgeneration and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425-446.

Darlaston-Jones, D. K., Pike, L., Cohen, L., Young, A. H., Haunold, S., & Drew, N. M. (2003). Are they being served? Student expectations of higher education. Issues in Educational Research, 13(1), 31-52.

Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79.

Faranda, W. T., & Clarke, I. (2004). Student observations of outstanding teaching: Implications for marketing educators. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 271-281.

Hadidi, R., & Sung, C. H. (2000). Pedagogy of online instruction-can it be as good as face-toface? AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, 2061-2065.

Hara, N. (2000). Student distress in a web-based distance education course. Information, Communication & Society, 3(4), 557-579.

Hill, J. S., & Christian, T. Y. (2012). College student perceptions and ideals of teaching: An exploratory pilot study. College Student Journal, 46(3), 589-602.

Hill, Y., Lomas, L. and MacGregor, J. (2003), “Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education”, Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15-20.

Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, Learning and Development. In M. Slowey, & D. Watson (Eds.), Higher Education and the Lifecourse. (pp. 67-78). SRHE & Open University Press.

Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press.

Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48(1), 41-47.

Justice, E. M., & Dornan, T. M. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-age college students. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 236-249.

Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 84-91.

Lammers, W. J., & Murphy, J. J. (2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom a descriptive profile of a US public university. Active learning in higher education, 3(1), 54-67.

Legon, R., & Adair, D. (2013). Introduction to the Quality Matters program Retrieved on February 10, 2015 from: https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/Introduction%20to%20the%20Quality%20Mat ters%20Program%20HyperlinkedFinal2014.pdf.

Lehmann, I. J. (1963). Changes in critical thinking, attitudes, and values from freshman to senior years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(6), 305-315.

Major, C., & Palmer, B. (2002). Faculty knowledge of influences on student learning. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(3), 138-162.

Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., & James, T. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 116-127.

Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185-189.

Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of educational research, 50(4), 545-595.

Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Pepe, J. W., & Wang, M. C. (2012). What instructor qualities do students reward? College Student Journal, 46(3), 603-614.

Pozo-Munoz, C., Rebolloso-Pacheco, E., & Fernandez-Ramirez, B. (2000). The'Ideal Teacher'. Implications for student evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 253-263.

Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66(3), 212-224.

Reneau, F. (2011). Junior faculty perceptions of their doctoral level teaching preparation: A cross disciplinary examination. University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations, Paper 1411.

Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., & Coates, D. (2000). University students' expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 309-323.

Senko, C., Belmonte, K., & Yakhkind, A. (2012). How students’ achievement goals shape their beliefs about effective teaching: A ‘build-a-professors’ study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 420-435.

Shea, P. J., Pickett, A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (2003). A follow-up investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61-80.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 767- 779.

Sikorski, J. F., Rich, K. B., Saville, B. K., Buskist, W., Drogan, O., & Davis, S. F. (2001). Student use of introductory texts. Paper presented at the Teaching of Psychology Conference, Kennesaw, GA.

Silverman, S. (2003). The role of teaching in the preparation of future faculty. Quest, 55, 72-81.

Smith, G. G., Ferguson, D., & Caris, M. (2001). Online vs face-to-face. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 28(9), 18-26.

Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The internet and higher education, 7(1), 59-70.

Soria, K. M., & Stebleton, M. J. (2012). First-generation students' academic engagement and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 673-685.

Swanson, S., Frankel, R. and Sagan, M. (2005). Exploring the impact of cultural differences, Marketing Education Review, 15(3), 37-48.

Tinto, V., Goodsell-Love, A. &Russo. P. (1993). Building community among new college students. Liberal Education, 79, 16-21.

Toohey, S. (1999). Designing courses for higher education. Open University Press, 325 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA.

Utecht, R. L., & Tullous, R. (2009). Are we preparing doctoral students in the art of teaching? Research in Higher Education Journal, 4, 1-12.

Voss, R., Gruber, T., & Szmigin, I. (2007). Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 949-959.

Warburton, E. C., Bugarin, R., & Nunez, A. M. (2001). Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and postsecondary success of first-generation students. Statistical analysis report. Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Reports. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED456168.pdf on March 25, 2015.

Webster, H., Freedman, M. B., & Heist, P. (1962). Personality changes in college students. In Webster, H. Freedman, M., Heist, P. Sanford, Nevitt (Eds.), (1962). The American college: A psychological and social interpretation of the higher learning, (pp. 811-846). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.