Instructional Internships: Improving the teaching and learning experience for students, interns, and faculty

Main Article Content

Abby L. Hemmerich
Jerry K. Hoepner
Vicki M. Samelson

Abstract

Students training for clinical careers must acquire skills for teaching clients, their families, and fellow professionals. Guidelines for training programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders (Speech-Language Pathology), however, do not currently include standards for pedagogy. The aim of this study was to measure changes in undergraduate students' perceptions of teaching and learning following an Instructional Internship experience, where they served as teaching assistants for foundational knowledge courses in the major. Using a qualitative research design, we coded 31 participants' statements from pre- and post-internship essays and identified major themes and sub-themes.   

            Our results indicate that by participating in a teaching experience, students develop a deeper appreciation for the relationships between classroom pedagogy, their own learning, and clinical practice. While this study focuses on a pedagogical experience for undergraduate students in a Communication Sciences and Disorders program, the principles and results are generalizable to other professions that train students to provide clinical and educational services.

Keywords: teaching assistants, instructional interns, mentoring, doctoral shortage, undergraduates

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hemmerich, A. L., Hoepner, J. K., & Samelson, V. M. (2015). Instructional Internships: Improving the teaching and learning experience for students, interns, and faculty. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i3.13090
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Abby L. Hemmerich, University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

Communication Sciences and Disorders, Assistant Professor

Jerry K. Hoepner, University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

Communication Sciences and Disorders, Associate Professor

Vicki M. Samelson, University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

Communication Sciences and Disorders, Assistant Professor

References

Adler, P.A. (1993). Personalizing mass education: The assistant teaching assistant (ATA) program. Teaching Sociology 21, 172-176. doi:10.2307/1318639

ASHA. (2002). Crisis in the discipline: a plan for reshaping our future. American SpeechLanguage-Hearing Association and Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Report of the joint ad hoc committee on the shortage of PhD students and faculty in communication sciences and disorders.

ASHA. (1985). Position Statement: Clinical supervision in speech-language pathology and audiology. http://www.asha.org/policy/PS1985-00220/

Anderson-Darling, C., & Earhart, E.M. (1990). A model for preparing graduate students as educators. Family Relations, 39, 341-348. doi:10.2307/584882

Baldwin, T.T., & Ford, J.K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x

Birch, J.B., & Morgan, J.P. (2005). TA training at Virginia Tech: A stepwise progression. The American Statistician, 59(1), 14-18. doi:10.1198/000313005X24174

Cici, J.C., & Ruiz, A. (1993). Transfer, abstractness, and intelligence. In D.K. Detterman & R.J. Sternberg, (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 168-191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D.K.Detterman & R.J. Sternberg, (Eds.) (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, conclusion cognition, and instruction (pp. 1-24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Fingerson, L., & Culley, A.B. (2001). Collaborators in teaching and learning: Undergraduate teaching assistants in the classroom. Teaching Sociology 29, 299-315. doi:10.2307/1319189

Froelich, A.G., Duckworth, W.M., & Stephenson, W.R. (2005). Training statistics teachers at Iowa State University. The American Statistician, 59 (1), 8-10. doi:10.1198/000313005X24138

Gaia, C.A., Corts, D.P., Tatum, H.E., & Allen, J. (2003). The GTA Mentoring Program: An interdisciplinary approach to developing future faculty as teacher-scholars. College Teaching, 51(2), 61-65. doi:10.1080/87567550309596413

Green, J.L. (2010). Teaching highs and lows: Exploring university teaching assistants’ experiences. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9 (2), 108-122.

Harland, T. (2001). Pre-service teacher education for university lectures: the academic apprentice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(3), 269-276. doi:10.1080/02607470120091597

Muzaka, V. (2009). The niche of Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs): Perceptions and reflections. Teaching in Higher Education, 14 (1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/13562510802602400

Peterson, E. (1990). Helping TAs to teach holistically. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(2), 179-185. doi:10.1525/aeq.1990.21.2.04x0260z

Shannon, D.M., Twale, D.J., & Moore, M.S. (1998). TA Teaching Effectiveness: the impact of training and teaching experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(4), 440-466. doi:10.2307/2649274

Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Socha, T.J. (1998). Developing an undergraduate teaching assistant program in communication: Values, curriculum, and preliminary assessment. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 27, 77-83.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

Tulane, S., & Beckert, T.E. (2011). Perceived utility and knowledge of graduate teaching assistants. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11 (4), 44-55.

Wallace, R.A. (1974). An alternative to assembly-line education: Undergraduate teaching assistants. Teaching Sociology, 2(1), 3-14. doi:10.2307/1317240

Yang, Y-T.C. (2008). A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: Asynchronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants. Education Technology Research and Development, 56, 241-264. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9054-5