Locus of control, academic self-concept, and academic dishonesty among high ability college students
Main Article Content
The purposes of the current study were to evaluate a measure of academic dishonesty and examine high ability college students’ loci of control and its effect on behaviors of academic dishonesty, as moderated by academic self-concept. A total of 357 high ability college students enrolled at two universities in the southwestern United States took part in this study. Variables and the moderation of academic self-concept were examined for the aggregate group (n = 357) and for the disaggregate honors and non-honors groups. Students completed the Rotter Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (Rotter, 1966), the Self-Description Questionnaire III (Marsh, 1989), and a scale to measure academic dishonesty based on the work of Geddes (2011). A 17-item measure of academic dishonesty was developed. Results indicate locus of control does not significantly predict academic dishonesty for the non-honors group, but several relationships were found among variables for the aggregate group and for the honors and non-honors groups.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Abilock, D. (2009). Guiding the gifted to honest work. Knowledge Quest, 37, 12-15.
Ablard, K. E. (1997). Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender. Roeper Review, 20, 110-115. doi: 10.1080/02783199709553870
Alarape, A. I., & Onakoya, A. Y. (2003). Correlates of examination cheating behavior among university students. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 11, 71-79.
Anazonwu, C. O. (1995). Locus of control, academic self-concept, and attribution of responsibility for performance in statistics. Psychological Reports, 77, 367-370. doi: 10.2466/pr0.19188.8.131.527
Antion, D. L., & Michael, W. B. (1983). Short-term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to two criterion measures of cheating behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 467-482. doi: 10.1177/001316448304300216
Arvidson, C. J. (2004). The anatomy of academic dishonesty: Cognitive development, selfconcept, neutralization techniques, and attitudes towards cheating (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, H., Ihrig, D., & Forstadt, L. (2006). Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 283294. doi: 10.1177/001698620605000402
Benson, H., Kornhaber, A., Kornhaber, C., Lechanu, M., Zuttermeister, P., Myers, P., & Friedman, R. (1994). Increases in positive psychological characteristics with a new relaxationresponse curriculum in high school students. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 226-231.
Beretvas, S. N., Suizzo, M., Durham, J. A., & Yarnell, L. M. (2008). A reliability generalization study of scores on Rotter’s and Nowicki-Strickland’s locus of control scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 97-119. doi: 0.1177/0013164407301529
Bridgeman, B. (2005). Unbelievable results when predicting IQ from SAT scores: A commentary on Frey and Detterman (2004). Psychological Science, 16, 745-746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01606.x
Carden, R., Bryant, C., & Moss, R. (2004). Locus of control, test anxiety, academic procrastination, and achievement among college students. Psychological Reports, 95, 581-582. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.2.581-582
Carton, J. S., & Nowicki, Jr., S. (1994). Antecedents of individual differences in locus of control of reinforcement: A critical review. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 120, 33-82.
Center for Academic Integrity. (2007). Facts about plagiarism. Retrieved from http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_facts.html
Chan, L. K. S. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 184-194. doi: 10.1177/001698629604000403
Colangelo, N., Kelly, K. R., & Schrepfer, R. M. (1987). A comparison of gifted, general, and special learning needs students on academic and social self-concept. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 73-77. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb00802.x
Coleman, N., & Mahaffey, T. (2000). Business student ethics: Selected predictors of attitudes toward cheating. Teaching Business Ethics, 4, 121-136. doi: 10.1023/A:1009855128668
Collier, R. G., Jacobsen, M. G., & Stahl, S. A. (1987). Locus of control measurements for gifted and nongifted children. Roeper Review, 9, 196-200. doi: 10.1023/A:1009855128668
Crandall, V. C., & Crandall, B. W. (1983). Maternal and childhood behaviors as antecedents of internal-external control perceptions in young adulthood. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct. Vol. 2. Developments and social problems (pp. 53-103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 229-246. doi: 10.1023/A:1017903001888
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, 1-38.
Dey, E. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighting adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 38, 215-227. doi: 10.1023/A:1024985704202
Digby, J. (1999). Peterson’s honors programs: The official guide of the National Collegiate Honors Council (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.
Downs, W. R., & Rose, S. R. (1991). The relationship of adolescent peer groups to the incidence of psychosocial problems. Adolescence, 26, 473-492.
Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430-457. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
Fimian, M. J., & Cross, A. H. (1986). Stress and burnout among preadolescent and early adolescent gifted students: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Early Adolescence, 6, 247267. doi: 10.1177/0272431686063004
Findley, M. J., & Cooper, H. M. (1983). Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419-427. doi: 10.1037/002235184.108.40.2069
Gadzella, B. M., Williamson, J. D., & Ginther, D. W. (1985). Correlations of self-concept with locus of control and academic performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 639-645. doi: 10.2466/pms.19220.127.116.119
Gallagher, J. A. (2010). Academic integrity and personality (Unpublished Master’s thesis). California State University: Long Beach, CA.
Gardner, W. M., & Melvin, K. B. (1988). A scale for measuring attitude toward cheating. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 429-432. doi: 10.3758/BF03334905
Geddes, K. A. (2011). Academic dishonesty among gifted and high-achieving students. Gifted Child Today, 34, 50-56.
Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342-354. doi: 10.1007/BF00992130
Harty, H., Adkins, D., & Hungate, E. (1984). Exploring self-concept and locus of control of students in two recognized approaches to elementary school gifted education. Roeper Review, 7, 88-91. doi: 10.1080/02783198409552857
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Wiley. doi: 10.1037/10628-000
Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200-210. doi: 10.1177/001698629604000405
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447
Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 141-150. doi: 10.1177/1080569911404059
Juster, F. T., & Smith, J. P. (1997). Improving the quality of economic data: Lessons from the HRS and AHEAD. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 1268-1278. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10473648
Kanoy, R. C., Johnson, B. W., & Kanoy, K. W. (1980). Locus of control and self-concept in achieving and underachieving bright elementary students. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 359399. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(198007)17:3<395::AID-PITS2310170320>3.0.CO;2-N
Karabenick, S. A., & Srull, T. K. (1978). Effects of personality and situational variation in locus of control on cheating: Determinants of the “congruence effect.” Journal of Personality, 46, 7295. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00603.x
Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1991). Locus of control in rural southern elementary gifted students. Psychological Reports, 69, 927-928. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1918.104.22.1687
Keith, T. Z., Pottebaum, S. M., & Eberhardt, S. (1986). Effects of self-concept and locus of control on academic achievement: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 61-72. doi: 10.1177/073428298600400107
Kirkpatrick, M. A., Stant, K., & Downes, S., & Gaither, L. (2008). Perceived locus of control and academic performance: Broadening the construct’s applicability. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 486-496. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0032
Knight, B. A. (1995). The influence of locus of control on gifted and talented students. Gifted Education International, 11, 31-33.
Kormanik, M. B., & Rocco, T. S. (2009). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review of the locus of control construct. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 463-483. doi: 10.1177/1534484309342080
LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M. (1990). Situational ethics and college cheating. Sociological Inquiry, 60, 190-198. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1990.tb00138.x
Laffoon, K. S., Jenkins-Friedman, R., & Tollefson, N. (1989). Casual attributions of underachieving gifted, achieving gifted, and nongifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 4-21.
Lefcourt, H. M. (1966). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 206-220. doi: 10.1037/h0023116
Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 307-315. doi: 10.1037/0022-022.214.171.1247
Li, A. K. F., & Adamson, G. (1995). Motivational patterns related to gifted students’ learning of mathematics, science, and English: An examination of gender differences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 284-297. doi: 10.1177/016235329501800305
Litster, K., & Roberts, J. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11, 130-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Self-serving effect (bias?) in academic attributions: Its relation to academic achievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 190-200. doi: 10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.199
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and a research monograph. New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107-116. doi: 10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.52
Marsh, H. W., & Bryne, B. M. (1993). Do we see ourselves as others infer: A comparison of self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of self-concept from two continents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 49-58. doi: 0.1080/00049539308259118
Marsh, H. W., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00227.x
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-123. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1
Martin, N. K., & Dixon, P. N. (1994). The effects of freshman orientation and locus of control on adjustment to college: A follow-up study. Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 201-208. doi: 10.2224/sbp.19184.108.40.206
Mathiasen, R. E. (1985). Characteristics of the college honors student. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 171-173.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 522-538. doi: 10.1023/A:1024954224675
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 219-232. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Mehta, M. (2009). Importance of relationship between locus of control and academic achievement of senior secondary schools. The Journal of Progressive Education, 2, 75-78.
Miller, A., Shoptaugh, C., & Parkerson, A. (2008). Under reporting of cheating in research using volunteer college students. College Student Journal, 42, 326-339.
Morrow, K. A. (1989). Locus of control and rural-urban status in gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 11, 207-208. doi: 10.1080/02783198909553212
Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41 129-145. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4103_1
Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229-241. doi: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11
Noel, J. G., Forsyth, D. R., & Kelley, K. N. (1987). Improving the performance of failing students by overcoming their self-serving attributional biases. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 151-162. doi: 10.1080/01973533.1987.9645882
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., & Merenti-Vӓlimӓki, H. (2007). Investigating the influence of attribution styles on the development of mathematical talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 64-81. doi: 10.1177/0016986206296659
Owunwanne, D., Rustagi, N., & Dada, R. (2010). Students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in higher institutions. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7, 59-68.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pavella, G. (1997). Applying the power of association on campus: A model code of academic integrity. Journal of College and University Law, 24, 97-118.
Pearson, K. (1895). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution III. Regression, heredity and pan ixia (abstract). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 59, 69-71. doi: 10.1098/rspl.1895.0058
Peugh, J. & Enders, C. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525-556. doi: 10.3102/00346543074004525
Pino, N W., & Smith, W. L. (2003). College students and academic dishonesty. College Student Journal, 37, 490-500.
Prihadi, K., & Hairul, N. I. (2011). How locus of control moderates the effect of perceived teachers’ expectancy and self-esteem among high-performing students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 34, 110-121.
Pyryt, M. C., & Mendaglio, S. (1994). The multidimensional self-concept: A comparison of gifted and average-ability adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 299-305. doi: 10.1177/016235329401700307
Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293-313. doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9116-5
Rinn, A. N. (2005). Trends among honors college students: An analysis by year in school. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 157-167.
Rinn, A. N. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 232-245. doi: 10.1177/0016986207302718
Rinn, A. N., & Cunningham, L. G. (2008). Using self-concept instruments with high ability college students: Reliability and validity evidence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 232-242. doi: 10.1177/0016986208319458
Rinn, A. N., Plucker, J. A., & Stocking, V. B. (2010). Fostering gifted students' affective development: A look at the impact of academic self-concept. Teaching Exceptional Children, 6, 2-13.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall. doi: 10.1037/10788-000
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28. doi: 10.1037/h0092976
Rotter, J. B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 43, 5667. doi: 10.1037/h0076301
Scheers, N. J., & Dayton, M. (1987). Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique. Research in Higher Education, 26, 61-69. doi: 10.1007/BF00991933
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441. doi: 10.3102/00346543046003407
Siegle, D., & Reis, S. M. (1998). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of students’ ability and effort. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 39-47. Doi: 10.1177/001698629804200105
Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., Pollard, E., & Romey, E. (2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 92-101. doi: 10.1177/0016986209355975
Sierra, J. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2006). A dual-process model of cheating intentions. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 193-204. doi: 10.1177/0273475306291464
Singhal, A. C. (1982). Factors in students’ dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 51, 775-780. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1918.104.22.1685
Smith, C. L., Sapp, M., Farrell, Jr., W. C., & Johnson, Jr., J. H. (1998). Psychoeducational correlates of achievement for high school seniors at a private school: The relationship among locus of control, self-esteem, academic achievement, and academic self-esteem. The High School Journal, 81, 161-166.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5 th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A casual analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378-385. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378
Vandehey, M., Diekhoff, G., & LaBeff, E. (2007). College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 468-480. doi: 10.1353/csd.2007.0043
Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
West, T., Ravenscroft, S. P., & Shrader, C. B. (2004). Cheating and moral judgment in the college classroom: A natural experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 173-183. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-9463-x
What is Plagiarism? (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.plagiarism.org/learning_center/what_is_plagiarism.html
Whitley, Jr., B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235-274. doi: 10.1023/A:1018724900565
Yong, F. L. (1994). Self-concepts, locus of control, and Machiavellianism of ethnically diverse middle school students who are gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 192-194. doi: 10.1080/02783199409553571