Main Article Content
One-for-one companies, such as TOMS and Warby Parker, have become a common occurrence in the marketplace. These companies promise to donate a good or service for every product purchased. To date, millions of products have been donated worldwide. This paper seeks to analyze the positive and negative impacts of the one-for-one model on both the one-for-one company and the people receiving product donations. A specific focus of the paper is to determine whether the one-for-one model is helpful or harmful to companies and beneficiaries. To gather information, I contacted sixteen one-for-one companies and asked for reports, gathered preliminary research completed by news outlets such as Forbes and the New York Times, and analyzed academic research. The study finds that the one-for-one model can be both helpful and harmful, depending on the conditions in which the giving is done. For example, if there is an immediate need for a good that cannot be produced in the beneficiary country, then a donation would be beneficial. However, if a donation such as shoes ultimately takes away jobs and reduces the market in the beneficiary country, then it causes more harm and long-term damage than it prevents. As this model becomes more common, it is important that consumers know the impact of their purchases on the beneficiaries and the companies know the benefits and repercussions of their actions.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ownership of the copyright shall remain with the Author, subject to IUJUR’s use and the rights granted by the Creative Commons license assigned by the Author. A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license will be applied to the published work unless otherwise indicated in the Student Author Contract. The CC BY-NC 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the published Work non-commercially, and although the new works must also acknowledge the original IUJUR publication and be noncommercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Better World Books. (2017a). “Great prices on new and used books.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.betterworldbooks.com/info.aspx
Better World Books. (2017b). “Partners.” Retrieved November 06, 2017 from https://www.betterworldbooks.com/info.aspx?f=Partners
Bixbee. (2017). Retrieved November 06, 2017, from http://www.bixbee.com/mission/
Blundin, C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: Fallacies and flaws. Johnson & Wales University, Providence, RI.
Bombas. (2017). “Giving back.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://bombas.com/pages/giving-back
Chandler, D. B., & Werther, W. B. (2014). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, globalization, and sustainable value creation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Cone, C. (2012). Executive summary: Goodpurpose 2012 [PDF]. Edelman.
Crespin, R. (2012, April 12). Corporate Sustainability Is Itself Unsustainable. Retrieved December 10, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/csr/2012/03/29/corporate-sustainability-is-itself-unsustainable/2
Figs. (2017a). “Our Story.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.wearfigs.com/pages/our-story
Figs. (2017b). “Threads for Threads.”Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.wearfigs.com/pages/threads-for-threads
Flandez, R. (2011, March 20). How giving helped one business grow. Retrieved from https://www.philanthropy.com/article/How-Giving-Helped-One-Business/226301
Freytas-Tamura, K. (2017, October 12). For dignity and development, East Africa curbs used clothes imports. New York Times. Retrieved November 6, 2017.
Herrera, A. (2013, March 19). Questioning the TOMS shoes model for social enterprise. New York Times.
Horoszowski, M. (2016, February 07). 64% of CEOs are increasing investment in corporate social responsibility in 2016 - Here’s why.
Jazner, C., & Weinstein, L. (2015, November 17). The buy-one-give-one model might make you feel good, but it doesn’t make the world better. Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.fastcompany.com/3053596/the-buy-one-give-one-model-might-make-you-feel-good-but-it-doesnt-make-the-world-better
Joyner, A. (2017, June 18). Beyond buy-one-give-one retail. Retrieved November 05, 2017, from https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/beyond-buy-one-give-one-retail
Kuota (2017). Our Cause. Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://kutoa.com/pages/our-cause
Marquis, C., & Park, A. (2014). Inside the buy-one give-one model [PDF]. Stanford: Stanford Social Innovation Review.
McPhee, W. (2014). A new sustainability model: engaging the entire firm. Journal of Business Strategy, 35(2), 4-12. doi:10.1108/jbs-11-2013-0106
Moon, J. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Connor, C. (2014, August 20). Bain deal makes TOMS shoes founder Blake Mycoskie a $300 million man. Retrieved November 05, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/08/20/bain-deal-makes-toms-shoes-founder-blake-mycoskie-a-300-million-man/#2d49271a5668
One World Play Project. (2017). “Our giving.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.oneworldplayproject.com/give-soccer-balls/
Out of Print Clothing. (2017). “Mission & Impact.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.outofprintclothing.com/pages/mission
Pettinger, T. (2017). Infant Industry Argument. Retrieved April 10, 2018, from https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/infant-industry-argument/
Ponte, S., & Richey, L. A. (2014). Buying into development? Brand Aid forms of cause-related marketing. Third World Quarterly, 35(1), 65-87. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.868985
Ponte, S., Richey, L. A., & Baab, M. (2009). Bonos Product (RED) Initiative: corporate social responsibility that solves the problems of ‘distant others’. Third World Quarterly, 30(2), 301-317. doi:10.1080/01436590802681074
Project 7. (2017). “Project 7’s Mission.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://project7.com/pages/mission
Reed, R. (2017, March 22). One-for-None: Aid dependency and the “TOMS Model”. Retrieved November 06, 2017, from http://harvardpolitics.com/world/one-for-none/
Rogers, F. (2017, Fall). View/Review: The pros & cons of corporate social responsibility. Retrieved November 5, 2017, from https://bbr.baylor.edu/corporate-social-responsibility/
Roma. (2017). “FAQ about Roma Boots.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://romaboots.com/pages/faq
Schawbel, D. (2016, December 23). Neil Blumenthal: What he’s learned from the success of Warby Parker. Retrieved November 05, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschawbel/2016/12/23/neil-blumenthal-what-hes-learned-from-the-success-of-warby-parker/#10ef39657143
Singer, J. (2016, February 23). Give a little, get a lot. Or not. Retrieved November 06, 2017, from http://www.therobinreport.com/give-a-little-get-a-lot-or-not/
Smile Squared. (2017). “Shared Smiles.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://smilesquared.com/sharing-smiles/
State Bags. (2017). “Give Back Pack.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.statebags.com/pages/2017-give-back-pack
Soapbox Soaps. (2017). “Soapbox.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.soapboxsoaps.com/pages/mission
Spaulding, A., Fernandez, S., & Sawayda, J. (2011). TOMS: One for One Movement [PDF]. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
The Economist. (2016, November 05). “Free two shoes.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21709563-new-studies-should-cool-warm-glow-surrounding-shoe-donations-free-two-shoes?fsrc=scn%2Ffb%2Fte%2Fpe%2Fed%2Ffreetwoshoes
The Economist Intelligence Unit (2008). Executives say corporate citizenship can boost profits over time, according to new intelligence unit report [Press release]. This bar saves. (2017). “Our Cause.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.thisbarsaveslives.com/pages/our-cause
Timmerman, K. (2011, April 06). The problem with TOMS shoes & its critics. Retrieved from http://whereamiwearing.com/2011/04/toms-shoes/
TOMS. (2017c). “Giving Water.” Retrieved October 03, 2017 from http://www.toms.com/where-we-give
TOMS. (2017d). “Shoe giving partners.” Retrieved November 05, 2017 from http://www.Toms.com/shoe-partners TOMS. (2017e). “Blake Mycoskie.” Retrieved December 10, 2017 from http://www.toms.com/blakes-bio
TOMS Giving Report [PDF]. (2013). TOMS Shoes.
Torres, A. (2013, Winter). TOMS Shoes: Philanthropic capitalism [PDF]. San Diego: University of California San Diego.
Twice as Warm. (2017). “How We Give.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://twiceaswarm.com/about-us/
Utley, T. (2017, February 08). Meet Bombas, the social impact company that gave 2 million pairs of socks to the homeless. Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/toriutley/2017/02/06/meet-bombas-the-social-impact-company-that-gave-2-million-pairs-of-socks-to-the-homeless/#5d813298288b
Vogel, D. (2008, October 16). CSR doesn’t pay [Web blog]. Retrieved http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/16/csr-doesnt-pay-lead-corprespons08-cx_dv_1016vogel.html
W, C. (2014, October 27). Putting the boot in development. Retrieved November 05, 2017, from https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2014/10/economics-toms-shoes
Warby Parker. (2017). “Buy a pair, give a pair.” Retrieved November 05, 2017, from https://www.warbyparker.com/buy-a-pair-give-a-pair Watkins, T. (2012, January 20). How Oblierté, the anti-TOMS, makes shoes and jobs in Africa. Retrieved from https://www.good.is/articles/how-oliberte-the-anti-toms-makes-shoes-and-jobs-in-africa
WeWood. (2017). “A tree story.” Retrieved November 06, 2017, from https://us.we-wood.com/a-tree-story
Wharton. (2015, February 16). “The one-for-one business model: Avoiding unintended consequences.” Knowledge@Wharton. Retrieved from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/one-one-business-model-social-impact-avoiding-unintended-consequences/
Wydick, B., Katz, E., & Janet, B. (2014). Do in-kind transfers damage local markets? The case of TOMS shoe donations in El Salvador. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6(3), 249-267. doi:10.1080/19439342.2014.919012
Youde, J. (2009). Ethical consumerism or reified neoliberalism? Product (RED) and private funding for public goods. New Political Science,31(2), 201-220. doi:10.1080/07393140902872369