Food Access in the Age of Online Grocery: An Evaluation of Current Retail Trends and Their Potential to Alleviate Food Deserts in the U.S.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Online grocery shopping is growing rapidly and has been heralded as a potential solution to food insecurity. Supermarkets are increasing their online presence, and some have joined the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) pilot program aimed at increasing online grocery access among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Although both the growth of the online grocery industry and the launch of the USDA pilot program are steps in the right direction for greater food access, it is worth asking how these initiatives will address food access among low-income consumers. This paper aims to answer the following questions: does online grocery shopping reduce or eliminate food access barriers for low-income consumers? Does it introduce new barriers? Does online grocery shopping have the potential to reshape the definition of a food desert? Using Hilary Shaw’s (2006) categorization of food access barriers—ability, asset, attitude—as a framework, online grocery shopping motivations were reviewed, and a case study on current practices at Kroger, Wal-Mart, and Amazon Fresh was conducted. The results suggested that none of the retailers’ current practices significantly reduce the barriers that low-income consumers are likely to experience when trying to shop online. Although the online channel eliminates the physical barrier of having to carry groceries, it in turn introduces new barriers, such as sensory risk aversion to buying perishables online, the necessity of possessing relevant technological skills, and having access to a computer. This paper proposes a new term, “digital food desert,” to define (1) a community without access to online grocery due to infrastructure constraints, or (2) a community with access to online grocery, but whose market manifests the conditions of a physical food desert online.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ownership of the copyright shall remain with the Author, subject to IUJUR’s use and the rights granted by the Creative Commons license assigned by the Author. A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license will be applied to the published work unless otherwise indicated in the Student Author Contract. The CC BY-NC 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the published Work non-commercially, and although the new works must also acknowledge the original IUJUR publication and be noncommercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
About AmazonFresh Delivery. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=202071950
Anesbury, Z., Nenycz-Thiel, M., Dawes, J., & Kennedy, R. (2016). How do shoppers behave online? An observational study of online grocery shopping. Journal of Consumer Behaviour VO - 15, (3), 261. http://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1566
Baertlein, L., & Kahn, C. (2017). Online groceries are a hard sell, even to avid internet shoppers: poll. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-food-online-poll/online-groceries-are-a-hard-sell-even-to-avid-internet-shoppers-poll-idUSKBN1CN1GD?mc_cid=ffdc13e8a6&mc_eid=4d9a5af90a
Campo, K., & Breugelmans, E. (2015). Buying Groceries in Brick and Click Stores: Category Allocation Decisions and the Moderating Effect of Online Buying Experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31, 63–78. Retrieved from http://10.0.3.248/j.intmar.2015.04.001
Chintagunta, P. K., Chu, J., & Cebollada, J. (2012). Quantifying Transaction Costs in Online/Off-line Grocery Channel Choice. Marketing Science, 31(1), 96–114. Retrieved from http://proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=crh&AN=71992151&site=eds-live&scope=site
ClickList Pickup. (2018). Retrieved April 15, 2018, from https://www.kroger.com/topic/clicklist
de Kervenoael, R., Elms, J., & Hallsworth, A. (2014). Influencing online grocery innovation: Anti-choice as a trigger for activity fragmentation and multi-tasking. Futures, 62, 155–163. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.004
Gasparro, A., & Haddon, H. (2017). Can Food Companies Get People to Make Impulse Purchases Online? Retrieved December 3, 2017, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/can-food-companies-get-people-to-make-impulse-purchases-online-1508119561
Holt-Giménez, E. (2011). Food Security, Food Justice, or Food Sovereignty? In Cultivating Food Justice : Race, Class, and Sustainability (pp. 309–330).
Huyghe, E., Verstraeten, J., Guens, M., & Van Kerckhove, A. (2017). Clicks as a Healthy Alternative to Bricks: How Online Grocery Shopping Reduces Vice Purchases. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 54(1), 61. Retrieved from http://proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=121264890&site=eds-live&scope=site
Kang, C., Moon, J., Kim, T., & Choe, Y. (2016). Why Consumers Go to Online Grocery: Comparing Vegetables with Grains. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), System Sciences (HICSS), 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on, System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on (p. 3604). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.450
Karsten, J., & West, D. (2017). How the Amazon-Whole Foods merger shrinks food deserts. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2017/08/29/how-the-amazon-whole-foods-merger-shrinks-food-deserts/
Leete, L., Bania, N., & Sparks-Ibanga, A. (2012). Congruence and Coverage. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 204–218. http://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11427145
McClintock, N. (2011). From Industrial Garden to Food Desert. In Cultivating Food Justice : Race, Class, and Sustainability (pp. 89–120). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=407779&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Naseri, M. B., & Elliott, G. (2011). Role of demographics, social connectedness and prior internet experience in adoption of online shopping: Applications for direct marketing. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 19(2), 69–84. http://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2011.9
Nielson. (2017). The Digitally Engaged Food Shopper. The Nielson Company and Food Marketing Institute, (3184), 20.
Premack, R. (2016). A simple change that could solve one of the biggest problems facing poor people. Retrieved December 5, 2017, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/15/the-simple-change-that-could-get-affordable-food-to-the-poor-people-who-need-it/?utm_term=.818935ee95d8
Richards, T. J., Hamilton, S. F., & Allender, W. (2016). Search and price dispersion in online grocery markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 47, 255–281. Retrieved from http://10.0.3.248/j.ijindorg.2016.05.004
Shaw, H. J. (2006). Food Deserts: Towards the Development of a Classification. Geography, 88(2), 231–247.
Sreeram, A. ( 1 ), Kesharwani, A. ( 2 ), & Desai, S. ( 3 ). (2017). Factors affecting satisfaction and loyalty in online grocery shopping: an integrated model. Journal of Indian Business Research, 9(2), 107–132. http://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-01-2016-0001
Treuhaft, S., & Karpyn, A. (2010). The Grocery Gap: Who Has Access to Healthy Food and Why it Matters. Retrieved from http://thefoodtrust.org/uploads/media_items/grocerygap.original.pdf
Turner, M. (2017). An Expanded Way to Pay for Online Grocery Pickup.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2009). Report to Congress: Access to affordable and nutritious food: measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences. Economic Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/ap036/12716_ap036_1_.pdf
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2017a). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Online Purchasing Pilot. Retrieved December 5, 2017, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/online-purchasing-pilot
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2017b). USDA Announces Retailer Volunteers for SNAP Online Purchasing Pilot. Retrieved December 3, 2017, from https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2017/01/05/usda-announces-retailer-volunteers-snap-online-purchasing-pilot
Van Droogenbroeck, E., & Van Hove, L. (2017). Adoption of Online Grocery Shopping: Personal or Household Characteristics? Journal of Internet Commerce, 16(3), 255–286. http://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2017.1317149
Walmart Grocery. (2018). Retrieved April 15, 2018, from grocery.walmart.com