Networks Supporting Problem-Based Invention Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Problem-based invention education engages students in complex processes of solving ill-defined problems with the support of teachers who act as facilitators of the learning process. Guided by interactional ethnographic epistemology (Green et al., 2012), we examine who and in what ways supported a high school team and their teacher working to invent a solution to a real-world problem students identified in their community. Our primary dataset included video recordings and a historian’s notebook collected by the InvenTeam historian during their invention project. Additional data included recordings of conversations with the teacher and the student historian who collaborated with university researchers in analyzing the InvenTeam year data. Through ethnographically informed domain and discourse analysis we identified three levels of the ecosystem that supported the team: local, national, and both. Analyses highlighted the role of technical mentors as a local support and the Lemelson-MIT program as a national support. Our study demonstrates the importance of the drawing on supports beyond the school to enable students and teachers to engage in problem-based invention education.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Author (2021)
Author (2019)
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349
Ashcraft, C., & Breitzman, T. (2007). Who invents IT?: An analysis of women’s participation in information technology patenting. Boulder, CO: National Center for Women & Information Technology. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/2012whoinventsit_web_1.pdf
Baker-Doyle, K. J. (2014). Stories in networks and networks in stories: a tri-modal model for mixed-methods social network research on teachers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.911838
Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 305-333. https://doi.org/10.2307/747928
Bopardikar, A., Bernstein, D., Drayton, B., & McKenney, S. (2020). Work-based curriculum to broaden learners’ participation in science: Insights for designers. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1251-1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9731-x
Bridges, S., Botelho, M., Green, J. L., & Cahn, A. C. M. (2012). Multimodality in problem-based learning (PBL): An interactional ethnography. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. L. Whitehill (Eds.), Problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation (pp. 99-120). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2515-7_7
Bridges, S., & Imafuku, R. (2020). Why focus on interactions in problem-based learning? In S. Bridges & R. Imafuku (Eds.), Interactional research into problem-based learning. Purdue University Press.
Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2019). Designing for rightful presence in STEM: Community ethnography as pedagogy as an equity-oriented design approach. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1591411
Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2000). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0898-5898(00)00032-2
Chian, M. M., Bridges, S. M., & Lo, E. C. M. (2019). The triple jump in problem-based learning: Unpacking principles and practices in designing assessment for curriculum alignment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1813
Committee for the Study of Invention. (2004). Invention: Enhancing inventiveness for quality of life, competitiveness, and sustainability. http://lemelson.mit.edu/search-resources/817
Cook, L. D. (2019). The innovation gap in pink and black. In M. Wisnioski, E. S. Hintz, & M. S. Kleine (Eds.), Does America need more innovators? (pp. 221-247). The MIT press.
Couch, S., et al. (2018). Addressing the gender gap among patent holders through invention education policies. Technology & Innovation, 19(4), 735-749. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21300/19.4.2018.735
Couch, S., et al. (2019). Invention education: Preparing the next generation of innovators. Technology & Innovation, 20(3), 161-163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21300/20.3.2019.161
Ertmer, P. A., Glazewski, K. D., Jones, D., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Gotkas, Y., Collins, K., & Kocaman, A. (2009). Facilitating technology-enhanced problem-based learning (PBL) in the middle school classroom: An examination of how and why teachers adapt. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 35-54.
Ertmer, P. A., & Park, S. H. (2007). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers’ beliefs regarding technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782507
Ertmer, P. A., Schlosser, S., Clase, K., & Adedokun, O. (2014). The grand challenge: Helping teachers learn/teach cutting-edge science via a PBL approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1407
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K–12 teachers, 40-54. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Fostering socioscientific reasoning in problem-based learning: Examining teacher practice. International Journal of Learning, 16(12), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i12/46781
Green, J. L., et al. (2020). Studying the over-time construction of knowledge in educational settings: A microethnographic-discourse analysis approach. Review of Research in Education, 44, 161-194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903121
Green, J. L., & Bridges, S. M. (2018). Interactional ethnography. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). Routledge.
Green, J. L., & Heras, A. I. (2011). Identities in shifting educational policy contexts: The consequences of moving from two languages, one community to English only. In G. López-Bonilla & K. Englander (Eds.), Discourses and identities in contexts of educational change (pp. 155-194). Peter Lang.
Green, J. L., & Kelly, G. J. (2019). Appendix A: How we look at discourse: Definitions of sociolinguistic units. In G. J. Kelly & J. L. Green (Eds.), Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science and engineering education (pp. 264-270). Routledge.
Green, J. L., et al. (2012). Ethnography as epistemology: An introduction to educational ethnography. In J. Arthur, M. J. Waring, R. Coe, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Research methodologies and methods in education (pp. 309-321). Sage.
Green, J. L., & Wallat, C. (1981). Mapping instructional conversations: A sociolinguistic ethnography. In J. L. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161-195). Ablex.
Herman, B. C., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2019). The role of informal support networks in teaching the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9610-2
Invention Education Research Community. (2019). Researching invention education: A white paper [White Paper]. The Lemelson Foundation. https://lemelson.mit.edu/node/2511
K-12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.k12cs.org
Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. L. (2019). Framing issues of theory and methods for the study of science and engineering education. In G. J. Kelly & J. L. Green (Eds.), Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science and engineering education (pp. 1-28). Routledge.
Lemelson-MIT. (n.d). Developing students’ creativity, inventiveness and problem-solving skills. Lemelson-MIT. Retrieved from https://lemelson.mit.edu/inventioneducation
Lu, J. Y., Bridges, S. M., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2015). Problem-based learning. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 298-318). Cambridge University Press.
Maaia, L. C. (2019). Inventing with maker education in high school classrooms. Technology & Innovation, 20(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.21300/20.3.2019.267
Mentzer, N., Becker, K., & Sutton, M. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students' performance and knowledge. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 417-432. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20105
Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K-8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674
Moore, R. A., Newton, S. H., & Alemdar, M. (2019). K-12 Inventure prize: Teacher reflections on educating K-12 inventors. Technology & Innovation, 20(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.21300/20.3.2019.221
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/21836
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/12984
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors
National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. The National Academies Press.
Navy, S. L., Nixon, R. S., Luft, J. A., & Jurkiewicz, M. A. (2020). Accessed or latent resources? Exploring new secondary science teachers' networks of resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21591
Nikitina, S. (2006). Three strategies for interdisciplinary teaching: Contextualizing, conceptualizing, and problem-centring. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500422632
Oregon Department of Education. (2020). District report cards. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3ubiSz0
Paladino, D. A. & Kocet, M. M. (2020). College counseling through a multicultural and social justice lens. In Paladino, D. A., Gonzalez, L., & Watson, J. (Eds.) College counseling and student development: Theory, practice, and campus collaboration. (pp. 43-76). American Counseling Association.
Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Examining barriers in technology-enhanced problem-based learning: Using a performance support systems approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00858.x
Perez-Breva, L. (2016). Innovating: A doer’s manifesto. The MIT press.
Petroski, H. (2018). Success through failure: The paradox of design. Princeton University Press.
Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 1-34.
Shanahan, M. C., & Bechtel, R. (2020). “We're taking their brilliant minds”: Science teacher expertize, meta-discourse, and the challenges of teacher–scientist collaboration. Science Education, 104(2), 354-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21550
Spradley, J. (1980/2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press, Inc.
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: A call to complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08318050
Zhang, H., Estabrooks, L., & Perry, A. (2019). Bringing invention education into middle school science classrooms: A case study. Technology & Innovation, 20, 235-250. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21300/20.3.2019.235