The Impact of PBL as a STEM School Reform Model

Main Article Content

Michael R. L. Odell
Teresa J Kennedy
Eric Stocks

Abstract

Project/problem-based learning (PBL) can provide an effective model for school reform when implemented with fidelity. In the report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm, it was recommended that if the U.S. is to remain competitive in the 21st-century economy, there must be a serious effort to “enlarge the pipeline of students who are prepared to enter college and graduate with a degree in STEM” (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, 2007, p. 6). The report included the recommendation that states develop statewide specialty STEM high schools (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, 2007, p. 6). In 2010, the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Academy (T-STEM) initiative was implemented to develop specialty STEM schools similar to those described in Rising Above the Gathering Storm. The primary instructional strategy of T-STEM academies is problem- and project-based learning. In the STEM context, PBL is well suited as a primary pedagogy for STEM learning. This paper examines the following questions: What outcomes occur when PBL is implemented in a low performing school district? What is the role of PBL in school improvement? What are the challenges to implementing PBL with high fidelity?

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Avery, S., Chambliss, D., Pruiett, R., & Stotts, J. L. (2010). T-STEM academy design blueprint, rubric, and glossary. Retrieved from http://www.edtx.org/uploads/general/pdf-downloads/misc-PDFs/2011_TSTEMDesignBlueprint.pdf.

Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & U.S. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349–352. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.20147/epdf

Educate Texas. (2015). T-STEM academy design blueprint. Retrieved from http://www.ndisd.net/hs/2015-blueprint.pdf.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463/rising-above-the-gathering-storm-energizing-and-employing-america-for.

National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Teachers Association. (2011). Quality science education and 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/21stcentury.aspx.

Rossett, A, & Sheldon, K. (2001). Beyond the podium: Delivering training and performance to a digital world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

Texas Education Agency. (2018). Texas science, technology, engineering, and mathematics initiative (T-STEM). Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/T-STEM/.

Texas Education Code 12.152 (c-12), (2009).

Texas Education Code Section 12.115 (c-1), (2013).

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, & School Support and Rural Programs. (2014). Evaluation matters: Getting the information you need from your evaluation, Washington, DC.