Grading for Growth: Using Sliding Scale Rubrics to Motivate Struggling Learners
Main Article Content
Abstract
In an effort to adopt more equitable and humanizing grading practices, this teacher inquiry explores how educators attempted to improve students’ views of learning and assessments by utilizing rubrics on a sliding scale. Using the sliding scale rubric approach to grading provided an opportunity for students and educators to rethink how learning is evaluated. The authors found that the logistics of using sliding scale rubrics as a grading tool does need to be refined and further evaluated; however, the belief that a student can receive a grade based on her or his individual starting point did have some positive implications for students and educators. Grading for growth by using sliding scale rubrics motivated students to read the rubric more closely and ask more questions about key indicators on the rubric. Once students were able to focus on their target area, they understood the expectations for what they needed to demonstrate. Students who previously appeared unmotivated requested feedback from peers and teachers. This article questions the commonly held beliefs educators can hold about grading and assessment practices and invites educators to rethink the inequitable grading practices that exist in schools.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Aguire, B. (2012). Rubrics for teachers: Differentiation & the slide rubric. Retrieved from https://owlcation.com/academia/Student-Success-via-Effective-Differentiation-The-Slide-Rubric
Boaler, J., & Confer, A. (2017, April 1). Assessment for a growth mindset (p. 2). Stanford University. Web.
Freire, P. (1984). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1997). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
Marzano, Robert J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Bt Bound.
Salazar, M. C. (2013, March). A humanizing pedagogy: Reinventing the principles and practice of education as a journey toward liberation. Review of Research in Education, 37, 121–148. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12464032
Wormeli, Rick. (2006). Fair isn’t always equal: Assessing & grading in the differentiated classroom. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.