The Problem with Printing Palmyra: Exploring the Ethics of Using 3D Printing Technology to Reconstruct Heritage
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of 3D printing technology to reconstruct the Arch of Triumph in Palmyra has opened a Pandora’s Box of ethical issues relating to the use of digital technology to preserve heritage represented by historical objects and sites. The author investigates the ethical implications of the three replicas of the arch made by IDA in New York, London, and Dubai after the original was destroyed in the Syrian Civil War. The ethics of digital reconstructions of heritage are not yet coded by UNESCO or ICOMOS, but it is important to hold reconstructed heritage to the same ethical expectations as other types of heritage. This paper concludes that the reconstructed arch failed to meet these expectations in four key ways. First, it does not address the human loss in Palmyra and the contribution of the Assad regime to its destruction. Second, despite an ostensible commitment to reproduction, the reconstructed arch is inaccurate in material and scale. Third, the arch is patented by the IDA and has had limited public and digital access. Finally, the reconstruction promotes a potentially irresponsible culture of quickly reconstructing destroyed heritage without respect for the context or current needs of the respective people. Through delving into Pandora’s Box, this article aims to highlight ethical issues specific to digital reconstructions of heritage that need to be addressed in formal codes of ethics concerning the preservation of heritage represented by historical objects and sites.
Downloads
Article Details
From 18 May 2018, the contents of Studies in Digital Heritage are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Our submitting authors pay no fee and retain the copyright to their own work.
How this works: to submit their work to the journal, authors grant Studies in Digital Heritage a nonexclusive license to distribute the work according to a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Once an article is published, anyone is free to share and adapt its contents—provided only that they do so for noncommercial purposes and properly attribute the shared or adapted information. Details of these terms can be found on the Creative Commons website.
Download SDH’s full author agreement here
Studies in Digital Heritage will insert the following note at the end of any work published in the journal:
© [Year] by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
References
Agencies in Beirut, 2015. "At least 400 killed by Isis in Palmyra, say Syrian TV reports." The Guardian. [online] 24 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/24/killed-isis-palmyra-syria-tv-reports-tadmur-islamic-state [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
Al Gergawi, M., 2017. The Triumphal Arch of Palmyra. [online] World Government Summit 2017. Available at: https://www.archindubai.org/ [Accessed 21 Apr. 2017].
Alkhateb, M. and Broomfield, M., 2016. "I’m from Palmyra. Assad is no better than Isis". The Independent. [online] 31 Mar. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/im-from-palmyra-and-i-can-tell-you-after-what-ive-seen-that-the-assad-regime-is-no-better-than-isis-a6961681.html [Accessed 18 Apr. 2017].
Al-Oraibi, M., 2016. Twitter Post. Available at: https://twitter.com/search?q=angered%20to%20see%20%27Miss%20America%27%20model%20under%20replica%20of%20Arch%20of%20Palmyra&src=typd&lang=en-gb [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
Avaaz, 2017. UNESCO: To act as a neutral organization and stop the Palmyra reconstruction plans. [online] Avaaz. Available at: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/UNESCO_To_act_as_a_neutral_organization_and_stop_the_Pal-myra_reconstruction_plans_1/?pv=6 [Accessed 24 Apr. 2017].
Bacchi, U., 2016. "Palmyra Arch in London: ‘Unethical’ reconstruction of ‘Disneyland’ archaeology criticised." International Business Times UK. [online] 19 Apr. Available at: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/palmyra-arch-london-unethical-reconstruction-disneyland-archaeology-criticised-1555659 [Accessed 14 Apr. 2017].
Bevan, R., 2016. Should We Celebrate a Replica of the Destroyed Palmyra Arch? [online] Evening Standard. Available at: http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/design/should-we-celebrate-a-replica-of-the-destroyed-palmyra-arch-a3233496.html [Accessed 14 Apr. 2017].
Bevan, R., 2017. Ruin or Rebuild? Conserving heritage in an age of terrorism. [online] Available at: http://theartnewspaper.com/features/ruin-or-rebuild-conserving-heritage-in-an-age-of-terrorism/ [Accessed 12 Apr. 2017].
Black, I., 2015. "‘They are barbarians’: Meet the man defending Syria’s heritage from Isis." The Guardian. [online] 29 Sep. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/29/they-are-barbarians-meet-the-man-maamoun-abdulkarim-defending-syrias-heritage-from-isis [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
Bond, S., 2016. "The Ethics Of 3D-Printing Syria’s Cultural Heritage." Forbes. [online] 22 Sep. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/drsarahbond/2016/09/22/does-nycs-new-3d-printed-palmyra-arch-celebrate-syria-or-just-engage-in-digital-colonialism/ [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
Brown, M., 2016. "Palmyra’s Arch of Triumph recreated in Trafalgar Square." The Guardian. [online] 19 Apr. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/apr/19/palmyras-triumphal-arch-recreated-in-trafalgar-square [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
Clammer, P., 2016. "Erasing Isis: how 3D technology now lets us copy and rebuild entire cities." The Guardian. [online] 27 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/may/27/isis-palmyra-3d-technology-copy-rebuild-city-venice-biennale [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
Cunliffe, E., 2016. Should We 3D Print a New Palmyra? [online] The Conversation. Available at: http://theconversation.com/should-we-3d-print-a-new-palmyra-57014 [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
The Washington Post Editorial Board, 2016. "America has accepted 10,000 Syrian refugees. That’s still too few." The Washington Post. [online] 2 Sep. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/america-has-accepted-10000-syrian-refugees-thats-still-too-few/2016/09/02/470446e2-6fc0-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html?utm_term=.981997ad761d [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
Factum Foundation, 2016. IDA Palmyra Arch copy. [online] Factum Foundation. Available at: http://www.factumfoundation.org/pag/236/ [Accessed 14 Apr. 2017].
Garaev, P., 2016. "3D Imaging Won’t Save Syrian Cultural Heritage." i24NEWS. [online] 15 Oct. Available at: https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/middle-east/127765-161015-3d-imaging-won-t-save-syrian-cultural-heritage [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
Gayle, D., 2015. "Palmyra arch that survived Isis to be replicated in London and New York." The Guardian. [online] 28 Dec. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/28/palmyra-temple-bel-arch-survived-isis-syria-london-new-york [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
ICOMOS, 1964. The Venice Charter: International Charter for the Conservation and Sites. [online] Venice. Available at: http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/research_resources/charters/charter12.html [Accessed 24 Apr. 2017].
Jenkins, S., 2016. "After Palmyra, the message to Isis: what you destroy, we will rebuild." The Guardian. [online] 29 Mar. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/29/palmyra-message-isis-islamic-state-jihadis-orgy-destruction-heritage-restored [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
Kriss, S., 2016. Why Recreating the Palmyra Arch in London Was Smug, Hypocritical and Tacky. [online] Vice. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/palmyras-arch-trafalgar-square-dubai-new-york [Accessed 26 Apr. 2017].
Lyons, K., 2016. "UK unlikely to reach target of resettling 20,000 Syrian refugees." The Guardian. [online] 3 Aug. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/03/uk-unlikely-to-reach-target-of-resettling-20000-syrian-refugees-by-2020 [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
McFarlane, N., 2016. The UAE is going to start taking in Syrian refugees. [online] What’s On Dubai. Available at: http://whatson.ae/dubai/2016/09/uae-syrian-refugees/ [Accessed 23 Apr. 2017].
Murawski, M., 2016. "Arch of History: what the ruins of Palmyra reveal about conflicting visions of the East and the West." [online] The Calvert Journal. Available at: http://calvertjournal.com/features/show/6145/power-and-architecture-palmyra-boris-johnson [Accessed 14 Apr. 2017].
Neumüller, M., Reichinger, A., Rist, F. and Kern, C. 2014. "3D Printing for Cultural Heritage: Preservation, Accessibility, Research and Education." In M. Ioannides and E. Quak, eds., 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. [online] Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 119–134. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44630-0_9 [Accessed 14 Apr. 2017].
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2011. Access to cultural heritage as a human right. [online] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/CulturalRights/Pages/Consultation10Feb2011.aspx [Accessed 27 Apr. 2017].
Richardson, N., 2016. "The Arch of Triumph of Palmyra is recreated in London - 1,800 years after it was built." The Telegraph. [online] 18 Apr. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/08/why-the-arch-of-triumph-of-palmyra-is-being-recreated-in-london/ [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
Russon, M.-A., 2015. "Afghanistan: Buddhas of Bamiyan resurrected as laser projections." [online] International Business Times UK. Available at: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/buddha-statues-destroyed-by-taliban-resurrected-laser-projections-1505794 [Accessed 26 Apr. 2017].
Silberman, N. A. and Bauer, A. A., 2012. The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanley-Price, N., 2009. "The Reconstruction of Ruins: Principles and Practice.: In A. Richmond and A. L. Bracker, eds., Conservation: Principles, Dilemmas and Uncomfortable Truths. [online] London: Routledge, pp. 32–46. Available at: https://www.archaeological.org/pdfs/sitepreservation/N_S-P_Article_Dec_2009.pdf
Taylor, A., 2016. "The Problem with Rebuilding a Palmyra Ruin Destroyed by ISIS – Does It Simply Help Assad?" Washington Post. [online] 20 Apr. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/04/20/the-problem-with-rebuilding-a-roman-ruin-destroyed-by-isis-does-it-simply-help-assad/ [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
The Institute for Digital Archaeology, 2016. The Triumphal Arch. [online] The Institute for Digital Archaeology. Available at: http://digitalarchaeology.org.uk/the-triumphal-arch/ [Accessed 27 Apr. 2017].
The Institute for Digital Archaeology, 2017. Imaging Projects. [online] The Institute for Digital Archaeology. Available at: http://digitalarchaeology.org.uk/projects/ [Accessed 27 Apr. 2017].
UNESCO, 2003. Declaration concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage. [online] Available at: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17718&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html [Accessed 25 Apr. 2017].
Voon, C., 2016. "Slick Replica of Palmyra’s Triumphal Arch Arrives in New York, Prompting Questions." [online] Hyperallergic. Available at: https://hyperallergic.com/323978/slick-replica-of-palmyras-triumphal-arch-arrives-in-new-york-prompting-questions/ [Accessed 14 Apr. 2017].
Willits, J., 2017. "Syria’s human losses and London’s replica of Palmyra’s arch." [online] Alaraby. Available at: https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/comment/2016/4/22/syrias-human-losses-and-londons-replica-of-palmyras-arch [Accessed 18 Apr. 2017].