Implementing Campus-level Programming: Pathways for Online Civic Engagement

Main Article Content

Angela McGowan-Kirsch


In a year marked by social unrest and a global pandemic, the 2020 presidential election occurred within a context of polarization and incivility. An American Democracy Project (ADP) campus believed that two ways to offset these complications were teaching students how to maintain norms of civility and helping students gain political knowledge that positioned them to contribute to online political discussions. ADP used Web 2.0 tools, namely social media and a web conferencing platform, to host political civic engagement activities and to promote civil political participation. Written from the perspective of a campus ADP chair, this reflective essay draws upon (in)civility, undergraduate political engagement, and online political discourse bodies of literature to offer suggestions for experimenting with Web 2.0 tools as a way to encourage students’ political civic engagement. In doing so, educators learn techniques for helping students become civil, informed, and engaged citizens in a polarized era.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
McGowan-Kirsch, A. (2022). Implementing Campus-level Programming: Pathways for Online Civic Engagement. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(4).
Reflective Essay


AASCU. (2020). About ADP. American Democracy Project.

Alger, J., & Goldberg, A. (2019). Renewing civil society: Madison’s living legacy. In W. V.

Flores & R. S. Rogers (Eds.), Democracy, civic engagement, and citizenship in higher education: Reclaiming our civic purpose (pp. 105-118). Lexington Books.

Arnett, R. C. (2001). Dialogic civility as pragmatic ethical praxis: An interpersonal metaphor for the public domain. Communication Theory, 11(3), 315–338.–2885.2001.tb00245.x

Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age (20th ed.). University of California Press.

Benson, T. W. (2011). The rhetoric of civility: Power, authenticity, and democracy. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 1(1), 22-30.

Bogard, C. J., Sheinheit, I., & Clarke, R. P. (2008). Information they can trust: Increasing youth voter turnout at the university. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41(3), 541-546.

Brandon, R. M. (2014). Student voting: A catalyst for civic engagement. College and University, 89(3), 61-64.

Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16.

Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883-895.

Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, morals, and etiquette of democracy. Basic Books.

Chaffee, S. H. (1982). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In G. Gumpert & R. S. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 57-88). Oxford University Press.

Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658-679.

Colby, A., Beaumont, E., Ehrlich, T., & Corngold, J. (2007). Educating for democracy: Preparing undergraduates for responsible political engagement. Jossey-Bass.

Dahlgren, P. (2012). Reinventing participation. Geopolitics, history, and international relations, 4(2), 27-45.

Darr, C. R. (2011). Adam Ferguson’s civil society and the rhetorical functions of (in)civility in United States Senate debate. Communication Quarterly, 59(5), 603-624.

Davis, R. (2009). Typing politics: The role of blogs in American politics. Oxford University Press.

Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17(4), 341–349.

Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University.

Dryer, T., & Ashwell, E. (2000). Attitudes towards politics and public service: A national survey of college undergraduates. The Institute of Politics, Harvard University.

Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224.

Foreman, C. H., Jr. (2008). Comments on chapter two. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Consequences and correction of America’s polarized politics (Vol. 2, pp. 88-93). Brookings Institution Press.

Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2012). The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton University Press.

Han, S.-H., & Brazeal, L. M. (2015). Playing nice: Modeling civility in online political discussions. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 20-28.

Han, S.-H., Brazeal, L. M., & Pennington, N. (2018). Is civility contagious? Examining the impact of modeling in online political discussions. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1-12.

Hays, C. E. (1998). Alienation, engagement, and the college student: A focus group study. In T.

J. Johnson, C. E. Hays, & S. P. Hays (Eds.), Engaging the public: How government and the media can reinvigorate democracy (pp. 41-55). Rowman & Littlefield.

Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Temple University Press.

Hurtado, S. (2019). “Now is the time”: Civic learning for a strong democracy. Daedalus, 148(4), 94-107.

Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Huh, C. U. (2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate

on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 621-633.

Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2009). Building an architecture of participation?: Political parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3/4), 232-250.

Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Rains, S. A. (2020). Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 795-814.

Klofstad, C. A. (2011). Civic talk: Peers, politics, and the future of democracy. Temple University Press.

Knight Foundation. (2020). College students, voting, and the COVID-19 election. The 100

Million Project.

Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., & Vedel, T. (2016). Civic political engagement and social change in the new digital age. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1807-1816. 10.1177/1461444815616218

Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32(1), 88-111.

Levendusky, M. S. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.

Loomis, B. A. (2000). Esteemed colleagues: Civility and deliberation in the U.S. Senate. Brookings Institution Press.

Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2008). The broken branch: How Congress is failing America and how to get it back on track. Oxford University Press.

McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.

McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449-464.

Meyer, M. J. (2000). Liberal civility and the civility of etiquette: Public ideals and personal lives. Social Theory and Practice, 26(1), 69-84.

Molla, R. (2020, November 10). Social media is making a bad political situation worse: America’s polarization problem is bigger than we thought it would be. Vox.

Morin, R. (2020, April 21). Coronavirus displaced millions of college students, who worry how they’re going to vote. USA Today.

Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society,

and participation. MIT Press.

Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443–460.

Mutz, D. C. (2006a). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Mutz, D. C. (2006b). How the mass media divide us. In D. Brady, & P. Nivola (Eds.), Red and blue nation? (Vol. 1). Hoover Institution and Brookings Institution Press.

Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new video malaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15.

National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future. Association of American Colleges and Universities.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.

Raum, R. D., & Measell, J. S. (1974). Wallace and his ways: A study of the rhetorical genre of polarization. Central States Speech Journal, 25(1), 28-35.

Rimmerman, C. A. (1997). Teaching American politics through service: Reflections on pedagogical strategy. In G. Reeher and J. Cammarano (Eds.), Education for citizenship: Ideas and innovations in political learning (pp. 17-29). Rowman & Littlefield.

Rojas, H., & Puig-i-Abril, E. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in a digital age. Journal of Communication-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 902-927.

Rossini, P. (2020). Beyond incivility: Understanding patterns of uncivil and intolerant discourse in online political talk. Communication Research, 0(0).1-27.

Ryfe, D. M. (2006). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(1), 72-93.

Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19-41.

Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1).

Strauss, V. (2020, August 31). The problem COVID-19 presents for college students who want to vote in November. The Washington Post.

Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A., & Curry, A. L. (2015). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2),188–203.

Uslaner, E. M. (1991). Comity in context: Confrontation in historical perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 21(1), 45-77.

Williams, R. S., & Humphrey, R. (2007). Understanding and fostering interaction in threaded discussion. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 129–143.