Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Abedi, J., & Benkin, E. (1984). The effects of students’ academic, financial, and demographic variables on time to the doctorate. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 3-14.
Almond, R.G., DiBello, L.V., Moulder, B., & Zapata Rivera, J.D. (2007). Modeling diagnostic assessments with Bayesian networks. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44 (4), 341-359.
Bair, C., & Hanworth, J. (2005). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 19, 481-534.
Barnes, B.J., & Austin, A.E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisors perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 297-315.
Carmona, C., Castillo, G., & Millan, E. (2008). Designing a dynamic Bayesian network for modeling students’ learning styles. ICALT, 346-350.
Council of Graduate Schools Ph.D. Completion Program (2009). Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Findings from Exit Surveys of Ph.D. Completers. Monograph. Released Sept. 2009.
Devenish, R., Dyer, S., Jefferson, T., Lord, L., van Leeuwen, S., & Fakerley, V. (2009). Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(1), 59-70.
Isaac, P.D., Quinlan, S.V., & Walker, M.M. (1992). Faculty perspectives of the doctoral dissertation. The Journal of Higher Education, 63 (3), 241-268.
Jiranek, V. (2010). Potential predictors of timely completion among dissertation research students at an Australian faculty of sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 5, 1-13.
Maher, M.A., Ford, M.E., & Thompson, C.M. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students – factors that constrain, facilitate and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education, 27 (3), 385-408.
Millan, E. Loboda, T., & Perez-de-la-Crus, J.L. (2010). Bayesian networks for student model engineering. Computers and Education, 55 (4), 1663-1693.
Mislevy, R.J., Almond, R.G., Yan, D., & Steinberg, L.S. (2000). Bayes nets in educational assessment: Where the numbers come from. In K.B. Laskey & H. Prade (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 437-446, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Muszynski, S.Y., & Akamatsu, T.J. (1991). Delay in completion of doctoral dissertations in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22 (2), 119-123.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press.
Rodwell, J. (2008). Predictors of timely doctoral student capabilities by type of attendance; The utility of a pragmatic approach. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30 (1), 65-76.
Seagram, B.C., Gould, J., & Pyke, S.W. (1998). An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education, 39 (3), 319-335.
de Valero, Y.F. (2001). Departmental factors affecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land-grant research institution. Journal of Higher Education, 72 (3), 341-367.
Witte, J., & James, W.B. (1998). Cohort partnerships: A pragmatic approach to doctoral research. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 79, 53-62.
Zhao, C.M. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31 (3), 263-281.