A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria’s “Panentheism(s): What It Is and Is Not”
Main Article Content
Abstract
I summarize and critically respond to Raphael Lataster and Purushottama Bilimoria’s paper on panentheism. I show that their suggested concept of panentheism is useless for academic discourse because it refers to contradictory positions.
Article Details
How to Cite
Göcke, B. P. (2019). A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria’s “Panentheism(s): What It Is and Is Not”. Journal of World Philosophies, 4(1), 201–203. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/2655
Issue
Section
Responses
JWP is an open access journal, using a Creative Commons license. Authors submitting an article for publication to JWP agree on the following terms:
- The Author grants and assigns to the Press the full and exclusive rights during the term of copyright to publish or cause others to publish the said Contribution in all forms, in all media, and in all languages throughout the world.
- In consideration of the rights granted above, the Press grants all users, without charge, the right to republish the Contribution in revised or unrevised form, in any language, and that it carries the appropriate copyright notice and standard form of scholarly acknowledgement as applicable under the CC-BY license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.