Main Article Content
While Stephen Davies argues that a debate on cross-cultural aesthetics is possible if we adopt an attitude of mutual respect and forbearance, his fellow symposiasts shed light upon different aspects which merit a closer scrutiny in such a dialogue. Samer Akkach warns that an inclusivistic embrace of difference runs the risk of collapsing the very difference one sought to understand. Julie Nagam underscores that local knowledge carriers and/or the medium should be involved in such a cross-cultural exploration. Enrico Fongaro searches for a way of experiencing cross-cultural art such that it can lead to a transformative experience Relatedly, Meilin Chinn uses the analogy of friendship to explore the edifying dimension of experiencing an art form. Lastly, John Powell studies whether Dickie’s Institutional Theory can be meaningfully used to identify works of art in Western and non-Western traditions.
How to Cite
Davies, S., Akkach, S., Chinn, M., Fongaro, E., Nagam, J., & Powell, J. (2018). How Do Cross-Cultural Studies Impact Upon the Conventional Definition of Art?. Journal of World Philosophies, 3(1), 93-122. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/1619