High School General Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Students with Significant Disabilities in Inclusive Settings

Main Article Content

Allison M. Kroesch, Ed.D.
Katherine N Peeples, PhD.

Abstract

Thanks to legislation that supports inclusion of students with significant disabilities in general education, general education teachers need to have appropriate knowledge, training, and self-efficacy in order to work successfully with these students in their classrooms. In this study, a survey of high school general education teachers investigated their perceived knowledge and capabilities specifically related to teaching students with significant disabilities. A range of subject areas, years of experience, and educational/training attained were surveyed. The findings support existing, recent research in highlighting the challenges of securing a high-quality inclusive learning experience for students with significant disabilities. Implications include the need for training and experience in special education topics for general education teachers to support their ability to teach students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kroesch, A. M., & Peeples, K. N. (2021). High School General Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Students with Significant Disabilities in Inclusive Settings. Research, Advocacy, and Practice for Complex and Chronic Conditions, 40(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.14434/rapcc.v40i1.31756
Section
Advocacy and Policy

References

Agran, M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities, 37(2). 123-133. www.jstor.org/stable/23879820

Blackwell, W. H. and Rossetti, Z. (2014). The development of individualized education programs: Where have we been and where should we go now? Sage Open, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014530411

Britton, N. S., Collins, B. C., Ault, M. J., & Bausch, M. E. (2017). Using a constant time delay procedure to teach support personnel to use a simultaneous prompting procedure. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615587505

Browder, D. M., Trela, K., & Jimenez, B. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301

Brown, F., McDonnell, J., & Snell, M. E. (Eds.). (2020). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (9th ed.). Pearson.

Carter, E. W., & Hughes, C. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(2), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100209

Coleman, M. B., Cherry, R. A., Moore, T. C., Park, Y., & Cihak, D. F. (2015). Teaching sight words to elementary students with intellectual disability and autism: A comparison of teacher-directed versus computer-assisted simultaneous prompting. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.3.196

Collins, B. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

Creech-Galloway, C., Collins, B. C., Knight, V., & Bausch, M. (2013). Using a simultaneous prompting procedure with an iPad to teach the Pythagorean Theorem to adolescents with moderate intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800402

de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., Minnaert, A., & Post, W. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention program to influence attitudes of students towards peers with disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1908-6

Gable, R. A., Tonelson, S. W., Sheth, M., Wilson, C., & Park, K. L. (2012). Importance, usage, and preparedness to implement evidence-based practices for students with emotional disabilities: A comparison of knowledge and skills of special education and general education teachers. Education and Treatment of Children 35(4), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2012.0030

Gehrke, R. S., & Cocchiarella, M. (2013). Preservice special and general educators’ knowledge of inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(3), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413495421

Hudson, M. E., Zambone, A., & Brickhouse, J. (2016). Teaching early numeracy skills using single switch voice-output devices to students with severe multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(1), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9451-3

Illinois State Board of Education (2017). Illinois report card. Retrieved from https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/State.aspx?source=studentcharacteristics&source2=iep&Stateid=IL

Jameson, J. M., Thompson, V., Manuele, G., Smith, D., Egan, H., & Moore, T. (2012). Using an iTouch to teach core curriculum words and definitions: Efficacy and social validity. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700304

Kent, A. M. & Giles, R. M. (2016). Dual certification in general and special education: What is the role of field experience in preservice teacher preparation? The Professional Educator, 40(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1120324.pdf

Kleinert, H., Towles-Reeves, E., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., Fluegge, L., Weseman, L., & Kerbel, A. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697

Knight, V. F., Wood, C. L., Spooner, F., Browder, D. M., & O’Brien, C. P. (2015). An exploratory study using science eTexts with students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614559214

Kroesch, A. M., Douglas, K. H., Jozwik, S., Uphold, N. M., & Chung, Y.C. (2020). Teaching American government content to students with developmental disabilities using technology and evidence-based interventions. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32, 925-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09726-9

Mason, R. A., Gunersel, A. B., Irvin, D. W., Wills, H. P., Gregori, E., An, Z. G., & Ingram, P. B. (2021). From the frontlines: Perceptions of paraprofessionals’ roles and responsibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419896627

Root, J. R., & Browder, D. M. (2019). Algebraic problem solving for middle school students with autism and intellectual disability. Exceptionality, 27(2), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1394304

Rotter, K. (2014). IEP use by general and special education teachers. Sage Open, 4(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014530410

Smith, B. R., Spooner, F., Jimenez, B. A., & Browder, D. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0002

Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Kemp-Inman, A., & Wood, L. A. (2014). Using an iPad2® with systematic instruction to teach shared stories for elementary-aged students with autism. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914534631

Walker, V. L., Douglas, S. N., Douglas, K. H., & D'Agostino, S. R. (2020). Paraprofessional-implemented systematic instruction for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(3), 303-317

Yakubova, G., & Bouck, E. C. (2014). Not all created equally: Exploring calculator use by students with mild intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(1), 111–126. www.jstor.org/stable/23880659