<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">25.06.04</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>25.06.04, Boone (ed), Music in the Carolingian World</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Emma Hornby</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>University of Bristol</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>Emma.Hornby@bristol.ac.uk</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022">
                <year>2025</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Boone, Graeme M., ed</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Music in the Carolingian World: Witnesses to a Metadiscipline, Essays in
                    Honor of Charles M. Atkinson</source>
                <series>Epitome musical</series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
                <publisher-loc>Turnhout</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Brepols</publisher-name>
                <page-range>Pp. 455</page-range>
                <price>€ 80,00 (paperback)</price>
                <isbn>978-2-503-60330-8</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright 2025 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>This volume in honour of Charles Atkinson focuses on the idea of music as a
            metadiscipline in the medieval west, in the sense of a practical and intellectual
            endeavour that straddles intellectual fields. A detailed bio-bibliography for Atkinson
            at the end of the volume, together with a cursory glance at the footnotes in each
            chapter, clearly illustrates the importance of his contributions to this field. The
            collection focuses on the Carolingian context, with groups of essays addressing music in
            relation to <italic>verbum </italic>(text), <italic>numerus </italic>(number),
                <italic>ars</italic> (formalised learning and practice), and <italic>cultus
            </italic>(liturgical practice). This is a helpful organising principle for the book,
            although it might tend to de-emphasise parallel themes that run through the collection,
            and that I hope to illuminate here.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The studies engage with a historical narrative whose broad outlines are familiar to
            medievalists. In 751, the Western-European Merovingian throne was usurped by Pepin the
            Short, members of whose family had gradually expanded Carolingian dynastic power as
            successive <italic>majordomos</italic>, orheads of the Merovingian royal household and
            court. Papal support was key to the success of this usurpation, and, from the outset,
            Carolingian rhetoric was grounded in their divine right to rule, and their
            responsibility for the eternal souls of their subjects; the Carolingian educational and
            cultural reforms are best understood through this theocratic lens. Politics and religion
            combine most explicitly in Gunilla Iversen’s contribution. She argues that direct
            connections may be made between liturgical texts in honour of Christ the King, and the
            political agenda of Louis the Pious (d.840, son of Charlemagne) and his sons and
            grandsons. While the liturgical texts present themes of <italic>rex-lux-pax</italic>,
            these rulers struggled with internecine conflicts and with external threats presented by
            Viking raiders and others. Iversen argues that the liturgical texts present a desired,
            idealised view of kingship and kingdom.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The 1980s and 1990s saw an explosion of scholarship on the Carolingian reforms. Several
            of those whose contributions fundamentally shaped me as a scholar have contributed to
            the present volume, making the reading of it a real treat, and outlining the
            “state-of-the-art” among highly-esteemed colleagues with years of experience of working
            with these materials. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Music’s role in the Carolingian reforms has continued to be a thorny question. As
            famously noted by Isidore of Seville in the seventh century, “if sounds are not held in
            the memory of man, they perish, because they cannot be written down.” How can we
            evaluate the relationship between the Gregorian chant codified in the Carolingian
            context and its late-antique Christian Roman antecedents, or its relationship with
            musical knowledge from antique Roman and Greek culture, since the first extant notated
            books of Gregorian chant date from as late as the ninth century? Charles Atkinson, the
            book’s honorand, has spent a scholarly career grappling with exactly these questions,
            and the book’s contributors have taken a variety of diverse approaches in addressing
            them.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Christian worship was of central importance in the Carolingian project. As emperor
            Charlemagne’s famous <italic>Admonitio generalis </italic>specified in 789AD, Christian
            worship was to be unified, renovated, corrected, and supported by a focused educational
            programme. John Contreni lays out multiple modern interpretations of the key
                <italic>Admonitio generalis </italic>passage referring to education; this cacophony
            results from inconsistent medieval text transmission. Contreni’s is a compelling
            interpretation: the <italic>Admonitio generalis </italic>orders that schools should be
            established in which boys should study (“read,” in the sense of “reading history at
            university”)--in order--psalms, [Tironian] notes, chant, computus and grammar. This
            curriculum, as Contreni argues, is logically structured to lead pupils towards a nuanced
            understanding of Christian theology. Chant is a central element of this curriculum. The
            moral importance of musical <italic>correctio </italic>is explained by Patrick Geary,
            who summarises musicologists’ understanding of the power and danger of music in
            Carolingian thought. This also helps to outline the ethically crucial role of cantors,
            in charge of chant and liturgy within Christian institutions. Susan Rankin’s chapter
            begins and ends with case studies illustrating practical applications of this
            curriculum: grammar was used by Carolingian poet and theologian Gottschalk as the
            starting point for analysing difficult chant texts, then proceeding to text models and
            meaning; and Aurelian built on the same ideas, together with concern for correct musical
            articulation of text. Rankin interprets other eighth- to ninth-century revisions to
            chant texts through the same conceptual lens, greatly enriching our appreciation of the
            Carolingian programme of <italic>correctio </italic>in relation to music. As Rankin
            discusses, the Carolingian rhetoric surrounding chant performance focuses more on
            attitude (taking on the Benedictine admonition to “sing wisely”) than the precise shapes
            of individual melodies. She incorporates discussion of eight-mode system as a crucial
            aid to memorisation, of practical music theory for providing a vocabulary with which
            cantors could effectively conceptualise and teach melody, and of the conceptual
            development of the chant book as <italic>libellum musicae artis </italic>(“a book of
            musical art”).</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Andreas Pfisterer and Rebecca Maloy both discuss the practical results of Carolingian
            engagement with chant. Pfisterer identifies regional patterns in the choice and ordering
            of office responsories in Easter week, demonstrating lack of repertorial fixity in the
            franco-roman chant tradition as it emerged during the Carolingian period. He engages
            only with text, where Maloy asks similar questions about repertorial fixity in offertory
            chants, incorporating melodic variants. She shows that while texts and melodies for the
            core pan-European repertoire became stable during the ninth century, more recent
            compositions continued to develop, with text variants (sometimes including entirely
            different verse texts) and melodic variants that encompass minor differences between
            versions, entirely different melodies, and everything in between. Both essays
            demonstrate that Carolingian rhetoric about <italic>correctio </italic>did not in fact
            result in repertorial, textual, or melodic unity across parts of the chant tradition.
            Notational unity was equally elusive, as can be gleaned from Marie-Noël Colette’s
            catalogue of ninth- to eleventh-century manuscripts now in the Bibliothèque Nationale de
            France that include marginal musical notation. This, together with summary remarks, is a
            useful starting point for those pursuing future detailed studies on musical marginalia,
            their contexts, their dating, and their notational variety.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The roots of Carolingian knowledge in the ancient world are an important component of
            understanding the context and content of Carolingian intellectual endeavours. Such roots
            are teased out for poetry, especially Virgil, by Jan Ziolkowski. Ziolkowski uses
            ninth-century editions of Virgil’s poems and new Virgil-influenced poetry to trace his
            influence and impact on Carolingian intellectual culture, and to grapple with how
            ancient knowledge was balanced with Christianisation. The integration of poetry and
            liturgical hymns as closely related Latin genres is central to Sam Barrett’s
            contribution. He offers a case study of a ninth-century manuscript that combines diverse
            Latin poetic genres, laid out for singing, and with significant amounts of notation
            added by the 920s. This is a clear, concrete illustration of the way that older Latin
            poetry was drawn on in Carolingian literary culture. The treatise <italic>De exordiis et
                incrementis</italic> by Carolingian poet and theorist Walahfrid Strabo offers an
            alternative route into similar questions of poetic genealogy. Felix Heinzer discusses
            the way this treatise outlines a history of the liturgy of the hours, and in particular
            the contributions of named individuals to non-biblical liturgical texts (especially
            hymns). Walahfrid Strabo did not subscribe to the narrative that Pope Gregory the Great
            had created the Gregorian chant tradition, nor to anxieties about use of non-biblical
            texts in liturgy. Instead, <italic>De exordiis et incrementis</italic> helps to justify
            contemporary composition of hymnographic texts which, Heinzer argues, may have been
            stemmed at least in part from Walahfrid Strabo’s own activities as a composer of
            liturgical poetry.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Three essays concentrate on speculative music theory, the area of study for which Charles
            Atkinson is perhaps most celebrated. In a rhetorical <italic>tour-de-force</italic>,
            Michel Huglo (transl. and ed. Barbara Haggh-Huglo) discusses the medieval western
            reception of Pythagorean number-based music theory, via Plato’s <italic>Timaeus</italic>
            and, in particular, via lambda-shaped diagrams. These diagrams demonstrate the
            relationships between musical notes conceptualised through the numerical ratios between
            string lengths that make those notes. Béatrice Bakhouche engages with the same topic,
            but with more focus on the relevance of Calcidius’s Latin translation of the
                <italic>Timaeus</italic>, showing that medieval commentaries attest to medieval
            Platonism as a live intellectual tradition in which thinkers at the time were deeply
            engaged. Her introduction to the lambda diagrams is easier for non-experts to understand
            than Huglo’s, and might be best read before his essay. Amnon Shiloah offers a
            counterpoint to these discussions of the development of Carolingian music theory.
            Shiloah surveys musical numerology in Arabic and Jewish writings of the middle ages. As
            in western writings, particular numbers are given especial significance (3, 4, 7, and 8,
            for example), and are imbued with metaphorical, metaphysical and magical properties.
            This essay is a useful corrective to western-centric or Christo-centric discussions of
            the later reception of ancient Greek philosophy, demonstrating that many of the
            associations and ideas had wider traction. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>As well as Carolingian treatises and commentaries, more informal writing in the form of
            glosses can provide useful information about the reception of earlier texts,
            demonstrating how they were grappled with intellectually (rather than simply being
            copied blindly). David Ganz offers a revisionist corrective to overly simplistic
            accounts of the importance of the liberal arts in the Carolingian education programme,
            arguing that despite relevant texts being copied and extensively glossed, there is
            little evidence of the direct influence of the liberal arts in Carolingian biblical
            exegesis. Mariken Teeuwen’s essay is particularly engaging, exploring eighth- and
            early-ninth century glosses on Boethius’s and Martianus Capella’s music theoretical
            texts. The commentary traditions on these two authors are interwoven, offering layers of
            anonymous but individual interpretations of their texts within the Carolingian context.
            Sometimes glosses presented together are mutually contradictory, apparently drawing
            together all known information on these topics for the purposes of clarifying their
            meaning and implications. While she lays out some of the challenges for modern scholars
            working with such materials, and signals that much is as-yet unknown, Teeuwen’s
            discussion and examples show the richness of this evidence base for scholars seeking to
            understand Carolingian music-theoretical knowledge in the decades pre-dating the
            earliest extant Carolingian music treatises. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The volume ends with a keynote presentation by Calvin Bower, in which he contrasts
            Boethius’s rational approach to music with Martianus Capella’s transcendent
            interpretation. The combination of both approaches in Carolingian thought, he argues, is
            fundamentally Christian and--more specifically--fundamentally Pauline. The Carolingian
            juxtaposition of music as scientific endeavour and as a valuable tool through which
            human minds can seek unity with the divine runs as a double thread through the entire
            volume of essays. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>My only caveat about the volume is that at some points, insufficient introduction is
            offered to the kinds of evidence under discussion, or to specialist terminology or
            concepts, making some of the essays impenetrable to generalist readers. That said,
            however, this is a rich and valuable collection of essays, which I recommend very
            highly.</p>
    </body>
</article>