<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24.11.05</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>24.11.05, Cordonnier, L’iconographie du Bestiaire divin de Guillaume le clerc de Normandie</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Julia Bolton Holloway</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>        University of Colorado, Boulder
                    </aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>juliananchoress@gmail.com</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022">
                <year>2024</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Cordonnier, Rémy</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>L’iconographie du Bestiaire divin de Guillaume le clerc de
                    Normandie</source>
                <series>Répertoire Iconographique de la Littérature du Moyen Âge: Le Corpus du
                    Rilma</series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
                <publisher-loc>Turnhout, Belgium</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Brepols</publisher-name>
                <page-range>Pp. 183</page-range>
                <price>€75,00 (paperback)</price>
                <isbn>978-2-503-60082-6</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright 2024 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>This iconographical study in French examines BNF français 14969 of the versified
                <italic>Bestiaire divin</italic> of William clerk of Normandy, associated with
            Kenilworth, which was produced in southern England circa 1265-1270 for a noble patron,
            Eleanor de Quincy, widow of the Count of Winchester, coming to France in the fourteenth
            century. It is one of twenty-five witnesses of the moralizing text based on the Greek
                <italic>Physiologus</italic>,derived in turn from the Greek Septuagint, and the
            Vetus Latina, rather than the Jerome Latin Vulgate. Besides <italic>Le Bestiaire
                divin</italic>, William also wrote <italic>Le Besant de Dieu, Les treis
                mots</italic> and <italic>La Vie de Tobie</italic>, among other works in
            octosyllabic verse, filled with Biblical allusions, moralizing allegories and satires
            involving all the social classes.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The Alexandrian <italic>Physiologus</italic> in Greek became the Latin version in four
            families of which this version is B, specifically H-B-Is, having additions from Isidore
            of Seville, functioning both as Bestiary and as a Dictionary of Biblical life forms, for
            exegetical use in sermons (in this text called <italic>sarmun</italic>), translated into
            European vernacular languages often with exotic images. Another Norman, Philippe de
            Thaün, a century earlier had already translated the <italic>Physiologus</italic>
            Bestiary into French verses, and more faithfully. This manuscript under study has both
                the<italic>Bestiaire divin</italic> and a <italic>Lapidary</italic> by different
            scribes. The <italic>Bestiaire</italic> has 3669 verses with miniatures in the court
            style of tinted drawings of the Franciscan-inspired<italic>Douce</italic>,
                <italic>Lambeth</italic>, and <italic>Gulbenkian Apocalypses</italic> of this
            period, and 90 decorative capitals. It is compared with all the other illuminated
            manuscripts of this text in Cambridge, London, Lyon, Oxford, and Paris. The book has
            copious footnotes.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Bestiaries, related to Aesop’s <italic>Fables</italic> and Ambrose’s
                <italic>Hexameron</italic>, as well as Isidore’s <italic>Etymologiae</italic>, came
            to be seen as books written by God with their moralizing lessons to teach virtues and
            vices, as a Biblical meta-language, a hermeneutic leap from the literal to the
            allegorical sense. This manuscript of thirty-five chapters illustrated with 77
            miniatures which couple together in larger form the allegorical reading to the smaller
            miniatures of each animal in question, has the double images being seen simultaneously
            on the page. The book proceeds by describing each animal, such as the lion, antelope,
            swordfish, calandra, pelican, eagle, phoenix, ant, siren, ibis, fox, unicorn, beaver,
            hyena, crocodile, serpent, deer, ass, monkey, panther, whale, ostrich, dove, salamander,
            dragon, elephant, mandragora, etc. and their interpretation in turn, giving their
            sources. The manuscript witnesses are then listed on pp. 141-142, followed by a 23-page
            bibliography, then by the 13 plates of 74 rather small but beautiful figures in
            color.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>This work parallels one I am editing on the illustrated Bestiary sections in Brunetto
            Latini’s <italic>Li Livres dou Tresor/Il Tesoro</italic>, in French and in Italian.
            Brunetto’s version depends far less on allegorizing, instead seeing its encyclopaedia as
            a kind of empowerment menagerie, such as assembled by Frederic II, as an Adamic
            controlling and naming of animals, which is well discussed in the two volume facsimile
            edition of St Petersburgh National Library MS Fr. F.v. IIIn 4, published by M. M.
            Moleiro in Barcelona in 2000, and its four accompanying essays by Russian and American
            experts presented in Spanish and English, with the text translated into Spanish. A
            simultaneous publication, interesting for its source studies but lacking the necessary
            iconographical study, is Davide Chiolero, <italic>Il Bestiario del Tresor di Brunetto
                Latini </italic>(Fano: Il Cerchio SRL, 2022).</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Rémy Cordonnier has provided a useful volume for art historians, manuscript scholars,
            Anglo-Norman scholars and particularly for scholars of medieval Bestiaries.</p>
        <p> </p>
    </body>
</article>