<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">22.01.24</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>22.01.24, Ashby/Sindbæk, Crafts and Social Networks in Viking Towns</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>William Sayers</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Cornell University</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>ws36@cornell.edu</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022">
                <year>2022</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ashby, Stephen P., Søren Sindbæk, eds</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Crafts and Social Networks in Viking Towns</source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
                <publisher-loc>Barnsley, UK</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Oxbow Books</publisher-name>
                <page-range>Pp. iv, 284</page-range>
                <price>$55.00 (hardback)</price>
                <isbn>978-1-78925-160-9 (hardback)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright 2022 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>From an editorial perspective, this is an anomalous book, however welcome. It is
            organized as twelve studies of medieval crafts in a variety of geographical locations.
            After two pragmatic and methodological essays, it consists of regular-length articles
            interspersed with what might be called theory-driven position papers by the editors. In
            all, the editors, singly or jointly, are responsible for five of the papers in the
            volume. One wonders why they did not simply opt for a joint monograph and also include
            leather, amber, glass, and wood working among their main topics, which now favor
            non-ferrous metallurgy and comb-making. This said, the principal topics as listed in the
            book's title--crafts, networks, and towns--are well served under the aegis of an
            overriding method of placing emphasis on the evidence for, and study of, artisans and
            craft production, rather than simply on the preserved artefacts and imagined end-users.
            Here, workshop debris is central. Innovative conclusions about the organization of
            proto-urban craft activity and networks of suppliers and practitioners are convincingly
            presented. Yet the networks by which raw materials reached workshops, and finished
            artefacts then reached markets and buyers, remain to be thoroughly explained. Even such
            basic marketing questions as whether artefacts moved singly or in lots are still
            unanswered.</p>
        <p>The introductory essay, by the editors, addresses "Crafting the urban network." The
            thesis of the collection, that "the history of crafts is intimately connected with that
            of urbanism" (1), is amply supported by the succeeding studies. The term "assemblage" is
            here used for material recovered from the floors of workshops, generally a daunting
            challenge for analysis on a site-by-site basis. New methods of material analysis, such
            as metallographic, isotopic, and biomolecular techniques, permit previously gathered
            evidence, including raw materials, to be revisited. The interpretative focus of artefact
            studies has shifted from the functional treatment of objects to the processes of
            production and the social agency of technology. These developments are accompanied by
            the advent of social network theory, with towns viewed as centers for cultural exchange,
            including evolving technologies. The editors disavow any grander narrative of historical
            change, favoring the study of social action on the micro-scale, which may amount to no
            more than a single season's workshop output but, conversely, activity on a greater than
            hitherto imagined scale and level of complexity, particularly evident in metal-work and
            textiles. Revealed are networks not only of supply and distribution but also of the
            exchange of technologies among early urban sites, which date to the end of the seventh
            century, justifying the term "spatially anchored persistence" (2) in craft activity. The
            image of the itinerant craftsperson is in retreat in current research, the settled
            community to the fore. Kin-based production units are less in evidence than the first
            manifestations of guilds. The actions of the church and secular elites, however, were
            determinative for the success of towns, which is striking after about the year 1000.
            Maritime trade routes were essential but the longer distances favored the emergence of
            distinctive town identities. Concurrently, "crafts are often carried out in subtly
            different ways across time and space; choices were driven by far more than an aspiration
            to some sort of objectively determined efficiency" (13). Best practices differed, town
            to town, often in response to local social values rather than technical skills. The
            "gripping beast" motif offers a compelling example of the complex of factors at work,
            more exactly, of the casting techniques employed with fresh brass ingots. This
            introductory essay concludes with a survey of the state of our knowledge about
            non-ferrous metal-working, textile production, leather-working, black-smithing, even tar
            production, with emphasis on these crafts as cultural knowledge. </p>
        <p>Pride of place in the body of the volume is accorded one of the first researchers to
            address crafts in towns, Johan Callmer, who offers a set of pragmatic notes in Chapter
            2, beginning with five foci for the study of craft production: material, tools,
            activities, specific knowledge, and society. He observes how much of non-ferrous craft
            production is related to elements of dress, especially female, that is, practical only
            so far as status is a practical consideration. Callmer notes how little of the evidence
            in, say, Denmark shows any Slavic influence. Nonetheless, the types of artefacts
            recovered exhibit a generally uniform character from Russia to Ireland. Knives, and
            their welding of steel inserts along the blade edge, are a good case in point; the
            diffusion of the relevant technology appears to have been from west to east. The
            discovery of complete sets of tools is rare but invaluable. Another amalgamation is
            waste piles and pits used by several craftspeople. Demand suggests that workshops
            maintained substantial stocks of ingots of bronze and similar alloys (e.g., copper alloy
            from the Alps), and antler for combs, whose tooth-plates and connecting plates were
            produced in series. Strikingly, decorative art styles, even mythological motifs, in
            addition to the very presence of certain kinds of artefacts, seem more determined by the
            makers of the artefacts than by either common or elite buyers. This said, the wealthy
            island of Gotland exhibits its own distinctive characteristics, as it does in other
            social dimensions. Major artefact categories are weapons, dress, and knives for personal
            use. Merchants who supplied craftspeople with raw materials or distributed their
            finished wares are an even more elusive social category, but seem to have had residences
            close to workshops. Much still remains to be done to acquire a complete vision of the
            trade and exchange system. Callmer summarizes: "In my opinion the craft production of
            northern Europe is a cultural phenomenon without close contemporary or later parallels"
            (14). The basic organizational unit was the family, and its house and outbuildings. At
            many sites, the term "collective" may be justified. There was an abrupt down-turn in
            this activity in the late tenth century. </p>
        <p>The editors devote a briefer third chapter to domestic circles, and urban networks, with
            estate production in between. Analytic terms here are collective manufactories,
            nucleated workshops, individual workshops, and household production. Pottery and
            textiles were always features of the last-named. Generally speaking, pottery-making
            never achieved the high degree of technical competence (use of the wheel, high-fired
            kilns) of other crafts in Scandinavia until after the Viking Age. Ceramics were then
            often imported ware and reflective of new social and culinary mores. Textile production,
            on other hand, was relatively homogeneous and the single medieval craft pursued from the
            narrower home environment and by women, although its best specialized work was accorded
            high status. Sail-making is an important example of a value-added operation that began
            with standardized bolts of woolen goods, woven by women and by female slaves.It appears
            that patterns traveled, while technological advances did not. The authors conclude:
            "Patterns of communication are not independent of the organization of production" (57). </p>
        <p>A series of fine-grained studies begins with Chapter 4 and Ailsa Mainman's essay "The
            emergence of professional pottery production: York, a case study." These essays are less
            readily summarized but are rich in detail. Pottery shards are often the most prolific
            form of material culture at archaeological sites and reveal a wide range of applications
            in food production and storage, and transportation, as well as offering unparalleled
            insights into the networks of makers and traders. The recurrent topic of networks
            informs Penelope Walton Rogers's lengthy and wide-ranging discussion of the domestic
            production of textiles in Britain and Ireland. Raw material tended to be local, as was
            much of consumption. Luxury produce, smaller items of female dress, moved in larger
            networks. The craft as a whole was at a transitional stage that laid the foundations for
            the late medieval cloth trade. Chapter 6, "Constructing specialism," is again by the
            editors and on a higher level of abstraction and hypothesis. The production of glass
            beads illustrates the case of specialities developing in urban settings and close to
            potential markets. But this is also true of comb-making with its reliance on antler as
            raw material, a resource from the hinterland and not from farther abroad. In the latter
            case, specialism did not develop on manorial estates. Evidence points away from the
            long-favored idea of itinerant craftspeople. Comb-making is also the subject of
            Callmer's second essay, with a focus on southern and eastern Scandinavia and the Baltic
            region. After an exhaustive review and classification of comb models, he considers
            comb-making to be the most revealing of the medieval crafts in terms of richness of
            evidence at emporia, demand, supply, volume of production, and resultant insight into
            networking. Yet, curiously, in all this descriptive detail we miss the the key and
            risk-filled moment of the actual sawing of the teeth of combs. Technologies and styles
            appear to have radiated out from the North Sea zone to Scandinavia. Steven Ashbury's
            complementary but more theoretical study examines innovations in comb-making in Britain,
            Ireland, and Scandinavia, while underlining the importance of the social and economic
            contexts in which innovation occurs. This might be said to be the theme of the entire
            volume.</p>
        <p>Chapter 9 offers Patrick Ottaway's "The archaeology of blacksmithing and the rise of
            urbanism in England and northern Europe <italic>c.</italic> 700-1100." The limits of
            medieval technology prevented heating iron to a pure molten state that might have
            permitted casting and the use of molds. As a consequence, iron artefacts were forged by
            hand. This study points up the general absence in this volume of weapons as primary and
            prestigious products of the blacksmith's art. The close attention to knives, locks,
            keys, and other increasingly specialized but standardized instruments produced not on
            farms or estates but in towns does not quite dispel a sense of disappointment, given the
            cultural importance attached to the tools of war. Weaponry seems to have been a
            production sphere in which the aristocracy commissioned work that was carried out on
            their estates. </p>
        <p>The editors return in the following brief chapter to discuss collaboration and expert
            knowledge. Non-ferrous metalwork, among the crafts reviewed here, was most dependent on
            imported sources for raw materials, metals, minerals, and clays, and involved a much
            wider selection of tools and techniques. Processes and products were also more dependent
            on the skills of other craftspeople, as might be gathered in a nucleated workshop, e.g.,
            for the production of molded copper keys and forged iron locks. Sword sheaths are
            another example of composite products and artisan collaboration, which may have been
            facilitated by urban residence. And it is in the working of copper-alloy metalwork for
            fittings and ornaments that such workplaces begin to resemble what the authors call
            "manufactories." Tens of thousands of scraps of crucibles, ingots, waste materials, and
            fragments of clay molds have been recovered at Birka and Ribe. Long-distance trade in
            raw materials was centered on Birka, Hedeby, Kaupang, and Åhus. On the basis of clear
            instances of design copying, the authors judge non-ferrous metal-working to be the
            sphere of craft activity most likely to advance our understanding of communications
            among individual artisans and traders. The development from bronze-casting (too narrow
            and simple a categorizing term) to non-ferrous metal-working is the subject of Unn
            Pedersen's essay tracing "complexity, choices, and cooperation" in Viking-age
            Scandinavia. Here too the workshop evidence in the form of debris is striking testimony
            to networking and cross-fertilization. The range of artefacts reflects the growing
            variety and complexity of early towns and their economies and social make-up. This
            penultimate essay is complemented by Penelope Walton Rogers's consideration of the same
            complex of questions in relation to non-ferrous metalworking in the towns of Britain and
            Ireland. Rogers concludes that within a single craft may be found a variety of social,
            commercial, and knowledge-based networks. Networks can change rapidly; systems vary from
            region to region; interchange may be one-way or reciprocal.</p>
        <p>This is an unbalanced but very dense and fully referenced book of studies. Both the range
            of the authors over twelve essays and the choice of crafts for comment (much on
            comb-making and non-ferrous metallurgy but little consideration of work in wood, stone,
            wicker, amber, jet) tends to skew the line of argument, as does, inadvertently, the
            shifts between research hypotheses and <italic>desiderata</italic>, and the minute
            analysis of workshop assemblages of debris. Although the study of such scraps is an
            exciting way forward, broader, less concrete questions at the far end of the
            scale--cooperation, inter-shop communications, networking, long-distance trade in raw
            materials--are only just beginning to come into focus. Nonetheless, these are now best
            addressed through the forensic efforts to understand the myriad bits of concrete reality
            that are the byproducts of the finished artefacts, long the near-exclusive focus of
            scholarly attention.</p>
    </body>
</article>