<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">22.01.14</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>22.01.14, Plumb, Picts and Britons in the Early Medieval Irish Church</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Michael Martin</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Fort Lewis College</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>martin_m@fortlewis.edu</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022">
                <year>2022</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Plumb, Oisín</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Picts and Britons in the Early Medieval Irish Church: Travels West Over the Storm-Swelled Sea</source>
                <series>The North Atlantic World</series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
                <publisher-loc>Turnhout, Belgium</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Brepols</publisher-name>
                <page-range>Pp. 202</page-range>
                <price>€55.00 (hardback)</price>
                <isbn>978-250-3583-471 (hardback)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright 2022 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>Oisín Plumb’s book is an ambitious study looking at migration narrative history between,
            as the title indicates, the Picts and Britons and the early medieval Irish Church. He
            looks at this migration narrative largely from written sources only, and through two
            lenses: documents from the fifth to ninth century; and then, how later centuries
            perceived and crafted such narratives (and in some instances re-crafted them for later
            ecclesiastical or political purposes, among other reasons).</p>
        <p>The back cover of the book claims “...this volume offers important new insights into our
            understanding of the relationships between Britain and Ireland in this period.” Although
            Plumb establishes early on that migration narratives will be a focus of the work, too
            often the intensely detailed research and discussions on etymologies and
            prosopographical concerns tends to overwhelm that thesis of migration narratives, which
            gets lost within each chapter. Readers actually might come to this book through its
            title alone and expect a very different historical account than what is provided or
            indicated by the above statement. Initial expectations might include not just the
            movement of people (and explanations of who might actually be whom in those accounts),
            but an historical analysis of such connections and developments within the medieval
            Irish Church (as the series title also seems to indicate with the idea of land and sea
            as <italic>cultural</italic> spaces). Such a history could examine how, with the Picts
            and Britons visiting (or remaining there whether through choice or exile), they
            established or built (up) ecclesiastical centers. At a surface level, a clearer subtitle
            too might have helped. The current one--“Travels West Over the Storm-Swelled Sea”--is
            technically accurate given that it really is largely about who traveled where/when.</p>
        <p>This work originated as Plumb’s dissertation work and the book still reads that
            way--written for a very select audience (dissertation committee members) and could have
            used more in the way of editing it out for a wider audience. This is a work of extreme
            specialization and for those whose research interests delve this deep and are as
            nuanced, this is an excellent book; for any audience outside that arena, even someone
            very familiar with Irish history, it can seem a “storm-swelled sea” of a work to
            navigate. The overall narrative structure is very dense in places and honestly does not
            need to be.</p>
        <p>The inclusion of many more maps, at least one per chapter, also would have been of
            phenomenal help to assist readers in “seeing” where much of this book is occurring. Even
            for someone familiar with Irish topography, and with the changes in place names
            throughout the centuries within the discussion, it would have helped to have some more
            visualization of these discussions of the migration narrative. There is only one map for
            the entire book, and it applies largely just to one chapter’s worth of discussion.</p>
        <p>The concluding chapter (Ch. 8) is probably the clearest of all the chapters in the book,
            and the book would have been better served by it as the introduction to the overall
            work. I would highly recommend that any reader who attempts to pick up this work start
            there, then return to the actual Introduction (Ch. 1) and continue forward. Chapter 2 is
            also exceptional in its analysis and discussion of the sources used for this work, and
            here Plumb excels. He utilizes not only well-known works but has also delved into a few
            very lesser-known works that this reviewer appreciated learning about! (The bibliography
            at the end is a phenomenal resource for scholars here.) As readers continue on, though,
            they will need to keep Ch. 2’s information strictly in mind as the discussions again
            begin to weave in and out of all of those sources at a sometimes-staggering pace. The
            extensive use of these primary source materials (some Latin, some Old Irish) is a
            significant assist to researchers, as are the translations that follow; however, they
            sometimes also overpower the analysis in terms of content, for they take up more space
            than the summaries at times.</p>
        <p>The comparative historiographic analyses throughout also are extremely good and here the
            writing is a deftly presented examination of the topics. Because of this they provide
            the reader with clear understandings for how the author reached his own conclusions,
            even if the conclusions themselves are not as secure as the evidence might seem to
            present. Three examples of this might help demonstrate what I mean here. </p>
        <disp-quote>“Once a hypocorism was in use, it could eventually become 
       detached from the original name-form, with the original link 
       forgotten. This could result in the separation of what had been 
       a single historical individual into separate saints with different names.” (39)</disp-quote>
        <disp-quote> “...it is impossible to do more than tentatively suggest possible means by which a tradition or traditions of British women active in Ireland at the time of Patrick could take the various forms in which they ended up being presented.” (70)</disp-quote>
        <disp-quote> “There is sufficient material to begin to sketch the haziest of outlines of the political and ecclesiastical context of the Orcades and its relations with external forces.” (146)</disp-quote>
        <p>Notice the language here: “could eventually become,” “could result,” “impossible to do
            more than tentatively suggest,” and “sketch the haziest of outlines.” Plumb knows his
            material well, again as evidenced by the amount of sources he investigated and how
            closely he read the material, but to frame the concluding remarks for these sections in
            such a way seems to show a lack of confidence in those conclusions. These types of
            conclusions certainly show the difficulty of this type of work and research, as well as
            the availability of evidence to demonstrate certain concluding statements. Whereas Plumb
            has certainly done his best to disentangle these traditions and sources throughout,
            again it is the overall narrative style that sometimes impedes progress toward
            understanding better how these migrants truly had an impact on the early medieval Irish
            Church.</p>
        <p>“Each migrant whose life can in any way be glimpsed in the source material, as with those
            whose activities have been entirely lost, travelled under their own unique set of
            circumstances. However, every individual migrant contributed their own thread to a
            complex tapestry of relations between norther Britain and Ireland.” (165). It seems to
            this reader, to use Plumb’s analogy, that Plumb spent too much time on those threads
            rather than stepping back to look more often at the tapestry as a whole as such a
            discussion could have enhanced this book’s migration narrative analyses. What Plumb
            deserves much credit for is that his examinations of those threads provides future
            researchers a much stronger, brighter palette of colorful threads to even better view
            and understand (reassemble?) that tapestry someday. </p>
    </body>
</article>