<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">22.01.11</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>22.01.11, Garrido-Anes (ed.), A Middle English Version of the 'Circa Instans'</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Laura Esteban-Segura</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>University of Málaga</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>lesteban@uma.es</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022">
                <year>2022</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Garrido-Anes, Edurne, ed</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>A Middle English Version of the 'Circa Instans'</source>
                <series>Middle English Text Series</series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
                <publisher-loc>Heidelberg, Germany</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Universitätsverlag Winter Heidelberg</publisher-name>
                <page-range>Pp. lvi, 209</page-range>
                <price>€70.00 (hardback)</price>
                <isbn>978-382-5347-666 (hardback)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright 2022 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>As its title indicates, this book presents the edition of Cambridge, Cambridge University
            Library, MS Ee.1.13 (ff. 1r-91v), a hitherto unedited manuscript which houses, among
            other contents, a Middle English version of the influential reference work <italic>Liber
                de simplici medicina</italic>, commonly known as <italic>Circa instans</italic>. This
            treatise on <italic>materia medica</italic>, which has been attributed to Matthaeus
            Platearius, was originally written in Latin at the well-known School of Salerno between
            1150 and 1170. It consisted of more than two hundred entries of “simples” of natural
            origin (be it mineral, vegetal of animal) or “medicines with a single active ingredient
            as opposed to compound remedies.” [1] The popularity of the <italic>Circa
                instans</italic> “extended over more than four centuries” as demonstrated “by the
            substantial number of surviving manuscripts, incunabula, and Renaissance editions that
            contain the work in Latin” (xiv). It was translated into several European vernacular
            languages, including English, German, Dutch, Danish, French, and Catalan, as well as
            Hebrew, which also bears witness to the importance and wide circulation of the treatise.
            The first attestations of the English version date from the early fifteenth century.
            This is of particular interest since, despite the large number of extant exemplars
            (Garrido-Anes lists 29 on page ix), copies of the Middle English <italic>Circa
                instans</italic>remain virtually unexplored, having received little attention to
            date. [2] Not all of them contain the text in full form and here is where Garrido-Anes’s
            work proves to be an asset since she provides the first edition of one of the complete
            Middle English versions.</p>
        <p>In the “Introduction” (xiii-lvi), the editor addresses the most relevant aspects of the
            background and context of the Middle English <italic>Circa instans</italic> by taking
            into consideration first the Latin treatise and discussing its precursors and sources
            along with its analogues and the influence that the text has exerted on later works on
            simples and herbals. Then, she moves on to deal in more detail with aspects of the
            English manuscripts that house the treatise, including the function of the vernacular
            work, which points to a wide variety of contexts in which the Middle English
                <italic>Circa instans</italic> was used, its transmission and the circulation of the
            copies. The English manuscripts can fall within three groups “corresponding to three
            distinct translations or compilations derived from the Latin treatise” (xxix). A
            significant part of the introductory section is devoted to the manuscript selected as
            the base text for the edition of the Salernitan text, namely Cambridge, Cambridge
            University Library, MS Ee.1.13. Thus, the manuscript is comprehensively described from a
            physical point of view, an index of the contents of the codex is given, and its
            ownership and history are discussed. [3] A thorough linguistic study, which pursues the
            dialectal localisation of the text by using the methodology put forward in
                <italic>LALME</italic>, follows. [4] This introductory section closes with the
            editorial policy and conventions, which are carefully explained.</p>
        <p>The edition, which has been meticulously prepared, is presented on pages 1-89. As
            Garrido-Anes contends, her main goal is to offer the version of the <italic>Circa
                instans</italic> in CUL, MS Ee.1.13 “as it was received and perceived by its
            medieval readers” (liv), not to reconstruct the archetype. In the transcription, the
            original spelling has been retained, but word division, capitalisation, and punctuation
            have been modernised. Some modifications have also been undertaken concerning the layout
            of the text, which has not been kept, such as the indication of the beginning of each
            folio by means of square brackets and the numbering of every five lines in the left
            margin. On the other hand, the critical apparatus gathers the most important variants
            found in three other manuscripts which contain a similar version of the Middle English
                <italic>Circa instans</italic> to the one found in CUL, MS Ee.1.13: Oxford, Bodleian
            Library, MS Ahsmole 1477 (ff. 114r-195v); London, British Library, MS Additional 29301
            (ff. 55r-89r); and London, Medical Society, MS 131 (ff. 3r-56v). This collation allows
            the reader to see in which ways the manuscripts are related. The apparatus also collects
            emendations and original readings which have been corrected in CUL, MS Ee.1.13.</p>
        <p>Explanatory notes are provided after the edition in the “Commentary” section (90-123).
            This is intended to make the text more accessible and comprehensible to the reader by
            explaining significant and/or difficult words and concepts. Justification of editorial
            emendations, as well as references to the Latin text can also be found in this section,
            which has been neatly arranged.</p>
        <p>As is customary in editions of Middle English texts, a “Glossary,” preceded by an
            introductory note which briefly discusses the origin of the words and lays out the
            conventions followed, is furnished on pages 124-175. The glossary caters for the needs
            of both standard readers and scholars, since it collects “words and phrases of a
            technical or specialized nature as well as others whose meanings might not be readily
            inferable from their spelling or the context in which they occur” (124). The editor
            draws from reference works by authors such as Mats Rydén and Tony Hunt (1989), among
            others to identify botanical terms, and resorts to Juhani Norri for medical terminology.
            [5]</p>
        <p>Apart from the main sections described above, two lists including manuscripts of the
            Middle English <italic>Circa instans</italic> and of the Latin manuscripts found in
            British and American Libraries are supplied on pages ix-x.</p>
        <p>The book finishes with two appendices: “Appendix 1” (176) contains a comparative table of
            entries in the Latin text and in the four closely related Middle English manuscripts
            under consideration in the edition, whereas “Appendix 2” (181) comprises a list of the
            marginal annotations found in CUL, MS Ee.1.13; and a “Bibliography,” which has been
            divided into “Early Printed Editions” (196), “Modern Editions and Secondary Sources”
            (197-208) and “Theses and Dissertations” (208-209).</p>
        <p>Overall, Edurne Garrido-Anes’s edition is a most welcome addition to the so far scarce
            work on the Middle English <italic>Circa instans</italic> and enhances substantially our
            current knowledge of it by focusing on one specific manuscript--but also offering
            variant readings from other three copies--and its context. Thus, it constitutes an
            invaluable contribution to the study of the English version of this particular treatise,
            as well as that of the vernacularisation, transmission and diffusion of science and
            medicine in the medieval period.</p>
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>Notes:</p>
        <p>1. Jean A. Givens, “Reading and Writing the Illustrated <italic>Tractatus de
                herbis</italic>, 1280-1526,” in Jean A. Givens, Karen M. Reeds, and Alain Touwaide,
            eds., <italic>Visualizing Medieval Medicine and Natural History, 1200-1550</italic>
            (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), 115-145, at 118.</p>
        <p>2. An exception to this is Esteban-Segura’s edition of the Middle English <italic>Circa
                instans</italic> preserved in Glasgow, Glasgow University Library, MS Hunter 307
            (ff. 167r-172v), Laura Esteban-Segura, “The Middle English <italic>Circa
                instans</italic>: A Pharmacopoeia from Glasgow, University Library, MS Hunter 307
            (U.7.1.),” <italic>Manuscripta: A Journal for Manuscript Research</italic> 59/1 (2015):
            29-60, which holds an abridged version of the text.</p>
        <p>3. The fact that the other texts in CUL, MS Ee.1.13 relate to recipes and plants allows
            the editor to sensibly propose that the manuscript “was owned and used by ‘yeomen’”
            (xlv).</p>
        <p>4. Angus McInstosh, Michael L. Samuels, and Michael Benskin, <italic>A Linguistic Atlas
                of Late Mediaeval English</italic>. 4 vols. (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press,
            1986).</p>
        <p>5. Mats Rydén, <italic>The English Plant Names in “The Grete Herball” (1526): A Contribution to the Historical Study of English Plant-Name
                Usage</italic> (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell, 1984); Tony Hunt, <italic>Plant
                Names of Medieval England</italic> (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1989); and Juhani
            Norri, <italic>Names of Sicknesses in English, 1400-1550: An Exploration of the Lexical
                Field</italic> (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1992), <italic>Names of Body
                Parts in English, 1400-1550</italic> (Helsinki: Academia Scientarum Fennica, 1998),
            and <italic>Dictionary of Medical Vocabulary in English, 1375-1550: Body Parts,
                Sicknesses, Instruments, and Medicinal Preparations</italic>. Abingdon and New York:
            Routledge, 2016).</p>
    </body>
</article>