<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">21.10.19</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>21.10.19, Cordez, Treasure, Memory, Nature: Church Objects in the Middle Ages</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Marguerite Keane</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Drew University</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>mkeane@drew.edu</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2021</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Cordez, Philippe</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Treasure, Memory, Nature: Church Objects in the Middle Ages</source>
                <year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
                <publisher-loc>London/Turnhout, Belgium</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Harvey Miller Publishers</publisher-name>
                <page-range>Pp. 284</page-range>
                <price>€90.00 (hardback)</price>
                <isbn>978-1-912554-61-4 (hardback)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright 2021 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>This book is a valuable addition to the history of medieval art and medieval religion, as
            well as to subfields such as aesthetics, the history of collecting, museum studies, the
            study of relics and reliquaries, the history of the medieval church, and the
            historiography of art. It is wide-ranging and ambitious, with analysis encompassing the
            variety of objects that might be found in a treasury or on display in a church, among
            them relics and reliquaries, chess pieces, griffins’ claws, and crocodile sculptures.
            The book has many striking and original insights about the relationship between objects
            and the ecclesiastic institutions that acquired and preserved them. Though the author
            focuses for the most part on collecting by institutions, not by individuals, many of the
            conclusions of the book might also shed light on the possessions assembled by royal and
            private collectors. The book is not only essential for scholars but also valuable for
            use in the classroom by students; the chapters are accessible and engaging. Sections of
            the book could function nicely on their own as excerpts that ask students to consider
            the history of medieval terminology for works of art, the role of inventories in writing
            the history of collecting, or single objects such as a unicorn horn or an ostrich egg
            reliquary that serve as case studies to illuminate how objects in church treasuries were
            wondrous devotional and historical agents. </p>
        <p>The material in this book has been newly translated into English, after an initial
            publication in German in 2015, as <italic>Schatz, Gedächtnis, Wunder. Die Objekte der
                Kirchen im Mittelalter</italic>(Regensburg: Schnell und Steiner, 2015), and then in
            a slightly revised form in French in 2016,<italic>Trésor, mémoire, merveilles. Les
                objets des églises au Moyen Âge</italic> (Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS, 2016). The
            author describes the differences between the versions, noting that the German version
            has “more and lengthier footnotes, with extensive quotations and additional
            bibliography” (5). The book published in English in 2020 that I review here is a
            translation of the French text. According to the author it “mirrors the French version
            (with complementary references to existing English translations of original texts and
            scientific literature)” (5). </p>
        <p>The book has a foreword (by Herbert Kessler), an introduction, three chapters, and a
            conclusion. In the short introduction, subtitled “<italic>Ars sacra?</italic> The
            ‘Objects’ of Churches,” Cordez proposes the central question of the book, with regard to
            medieval objects: “Before they became museum objects and historical testimonies, how
            were these objects conceived of, experienced, and used? Moreover, this question can and
            should be turned on its head: To what extent have modern conceptions of history and of
            the museum been shaped by the ecclesiastical heritage of the Middle Ages?” (9). The
            first question has been thoroughly studied but the second, on the implications of
            ecclesiastical collections for the contemporary museum and an understanding of the past,
            has not been analyzed as often. It is a compelling question that Cordez poses in the
            introduction and returns to in the conclusion, opening and closing his book by asking
            the reader to consider the implications of his analysis for the historiography of art
            and for museum studies. The introduction also questions the etymological roots of words
            taken for granted today to describe medieval art, such as <italic>ars sacra</italic>, or
                <italic>objet d’art</italic> (these terms are modern), and reminds the reader of the
            definition of terms used historically for objects, such as <italic>res, causa, obiectum,</italic> and <italic>joyau.</italic></p>
        <p>Chapter 1, titled “The Imaginary of Treasure,” is chronological. In this fascinating
            chapter Cordez traces the changes in the definition of <italic>thesaurus</italic> or
                <italic>thesaurus ecclesiae</italic> starting with late antiquity, then moving to
            Carolingian practice, and then finally to the High and Late Middle Ages. Cordez
            interrogates how and why <italic>thesaurus</italic> was used in textual sources and how
            it changed over time, from “spiritual treasure” to “church treasure,” and finally in the
            late Middle Ages, “common treasure.” He ends the chapter with a consideration of
            indulgences, part of what he calls the “Treasury of Merit” of the late Middle Ages and
            early modern period. In this chapter Cordez contextualizes the objects of the church
            treasury as one element of the ecclesiastic attitude toward material wealth and
            exchange; his discussion of indulgences and their relationship to ideas about the church
            treasury was particularly compelling.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>In the second chapter Cordez considers why church treasuries were assembled and how we
            know about them, noting the importance of “memory (<italic>memoria</italic>)” as “one of
            the driving social forces behind the formation of medieval church treasuries” (61).
            Relics were the most important memorial objects in the treasury, as well as other
            objects that maintained an association with a church’s past; for example, a prestigious
            founder might be invoked through such an object. We know the history of relics and other
            church objects through textual sources such as labels and inventories, and Cordez
            insists on a careful analysis of these texts. Rather than simply accepting labels and
            inventories as documents of objects at a point in time, he critically analyzes the
            choice of words, the organization, and the narratives of labels and inventories for what
            they reveal about institutional values and attitudes toward objects and the past. This
            analysis contributes substantially to the burgeoning study of the rhetoric of medieval
            inventories. It aligns with other recent work on the literary, memorial, and spatial
            strategies of inventories by scholars such as Joseph Ackley, Erik Inglis, Therese
            Martin, Christina Normore, and Mariah Proctor-Tiffany. In this chapter Cordez also
            analyzes the process of creating a narrative for a memorial object, focusing on two
            illustrative examples: the staff of St. Peter (still today at Cologne Cathedral), and
            the foreskin of Christ (preserved at the abbey of Saint-Sauveur at Charroux in western
            France). In the final example of church treasury objects, under a subheading called
            “Chess and the Imaginary of Power,” he considers the social and political implications
            of chess pieces and chessboards as treasury objects. In detailed case studies Cordez
            analyzes the so-called “chess set of Charlemagne” at the abbey of Saint-Denis and chess
            pieces from the cathedral of Reims; both are well illustrated with color photographs. </p>
        <p>Wondrous and marvelous objects from the natural world that were preserved in church
            treasuries are the topic of chapter 3. It is a minor point, but I regret the omission of
            the English word “wonder” or “marvel” in the title of the book. The German title uses
            the word <italic>Wunder</italic> and the French<italic>merveilles</italic>, but for the
            English translation only the term “nature” has been employed. Cordez explains this
            choice: “Differences in the semantic fields of ‘marvel’ and ‘wonder’ among the three
            languages motivated the choice of the term ‘nature’ for the main title in English” (5).
            He groups these objects under the heading “naturalia,” and notes the importance of such
            objects from the natural world to the early modern history of science. But I think
            limiting the translation to the word “nature” in the title is insufficient to capture
            the remarkable content of this chapter that includes discussion of the materials of
            ostrich eggs, coconuts, mollusk shells, unicorn horns, giants, monsters, dragons,
            griffins, and sea creatures. In this chapter in particular the color illustrations
            greatly enhance Cordez’s written analysis, as the interest of these objects was largely
            due to the display of their remarkable raw materials. </p>
        <p>The bibliography has been selectively updated, with a smattering of publications from the
            last couple of years, but nearly all of the citations date prior to 2016. Scholars who
            know the literature on this topic will not be very affected, but newcomers to the field
            using the bibliography should be aware of this limitation. </p>
    </body>
</article>