<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">20.08.47</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>20.08.47, Rudy, Image, Knife, and Gluepot</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Eyal  Poleg</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>Queen Mary University of London</aff>
          <address>
            <email>e.poleg@qmul.ac.uk</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020">
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Rudy, Kathryn M</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Image, Knife, and Gluepot: Early Assemblage in Manuscript and Print, </source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
        <publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Open Book</publisher-name>
        <page-range>pp. 356</page-range>
        <price>£59.95 (hardback) £22.95 (paperback) £0 (ebook)</price>
        <isbn>978-1-78374-518-0 (https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0145) (ebook)</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2020 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p/>
    <p>This is an extraordinary book about extraordinary books. Kate Rudy's recent study
                    challenges the boundaries of academic books both in its format, a freely
                    available e-book (as well as paperback and hardback versions) containing QR
                    codes and a digital appendix, and in its contents, moving seamlessly between
                    in-depth manuscript analysis, a "methodological self-portrait" (7), and an
                    honest assessment of the ability to conduct research in the twenty-first
                    century. The c.1500 composite Book of Hours at the centre of the study is
                    equally avant-guard. Bridging the gap between print and manuscript, it is a
                    unique witness to a period of transition, and, equally important, to the
                    reception of early print among devotional communities. It was cut and
                    dissembled, leading the author on a cross-country detective story to retrieve
                    its components and reconstruct the original manuscript, as well as other similar
                    books. This is narrated in a clear and engaging tone, and illustrated 137 colour
                    images and 108 e-figures. The latter consists of thumbnails, a QR code and
                    stable URL, and makes reading the printed book quite playful (though,
                    ultimately, favours the digital version).</p>
    <p>The book moves between three temporal plains. The first is the last decades of
                    the fifteenth century and the first decades of the sixteenth, a transformative
                    era when craftsmen, as well as lay and religious communities, innovated their
                    books, merging print and manuscript in new forms. The second is the nineteenth
                    century, when curators, collectors and book sellers dismembered these books,
                    separating print and manuscript, and rearranging their components based on new
                    principles. The third plain is the author's present, as she moves between
                    academic positions, hopping for short visits to manuscript and print
                    collections, and gradually unfolds the complex and wonderful creations of a lay
                    devote community c.1500. The book merges these plains into one whole, in which
                    come together the modern researcher, the nineteen-century collector, and the
                    medieval compiler. The author's research is paramount. Without the detailed
                    reconstruction of fragments currently kept in separate collections, the original
                    manuscript would have been all but invisible to modern scholars.</p>
    <p>The first chapter, "Cut, Pasted, and Cut Again," comprises half of the entire
                    book. It follows the author from her accidental encounter with a photograph of a
                    printed roundel of St Barbara pasted into a manuscript page. This has led her,
                    over the course of several years and numerous visits to the British Museum's
                    Prints and Drawing Study Room, to the reconstruction of a unique late medieval
                    manuscript. The original manuscript, compiled c.1500 in a community of Beghards
                    (devote laymen associated with the Franciscan Order), contained "more early
                    prints than any other surviving manuscript" (13), and serves as an important
                    witness to the amalgamation of manuscript and print. This manuscript no longer
                    exists. It was broken down in the nineteenth century, and much of the chapter is
                    taken by the author's minute detective work, combining printed images (primarily
                    at the British Museum) and the dismembered book, broken into two manuscripts at
                    the British Library. This careful re-creation reveals how the Beghards employed
                    dozens of printed images by several printers, woodcuts and engravings, some
                    purchased already coloured, some cut and pasted, and others bound as
                    single-leaves into the book. The compiler adapted the images to best fit his
                    book: cutting and colouring, adding frames, and modifying their details to suit
                    a new reality (as, for example, painting a basket over a wheel had transformed
                    an image of Saint Catherine into one of St Lucia). The printed images were
                    central to the compilation of the book, dictating the arrangement of its text
                    and layout. In the nineteenth century the British Museum purchased the book for
                    its printed components. It followed 'good practice' in removing them from the
                    book and pasting them into mattes arranged by school, master or media. Over
                    years of visits to the collections, the author carefully undid this modern
                    intervention, revealing the unique and complex production of the medieval book.
                    This is inevitably partial, as the whereabouts of some of the images remain
                    unknown.</p>
    <p>The reconstruction of the book was eased by the original foliation of the
                    manuscript, an uncommon feature in medieval prayer books. In the second chapter,
                    "A Novel Function for the Calendar in Add. Ms. 24332," this is linked to a
                    unique calendar. Entries in the calendar extend beyond providing date and
                    saint's name to supply folio numbers. This enabled readers to quickly retrieve
                    prayers for a specific feast. It also saved labour and space. At times readers
                    were directed to more generic prayers, applicable for certain types of saints:
                    pair of saints, bishops, or group of saints. Such malleability of text reflects
                    the works of early printers, who often printed images either of generic saints,
                    or with interchangeable emblems, to befit the needs of diverse readers. The
                    author traces similar books to a Franciscan milieu and compares it to a mid
                    sixteenth-century prayerbook aimed at children or young adults. The author uses
                    it to suggest the original manuscript was likewise aimed at young readers.
                    However, evidence from other religious houses, in the Low Countries and beyond,
                    suggests its use of the Vernacular, and explication of reading aids, could be
                    ascribed to use outside the scholarly hubs of monasteries, friaries and
                    universities, as devote men and women, as well as nuns and lay brothers,
                    experimented in novel book technologies. The deep analysis of specific
                    manuscripts is one of the book's evident strengths. At times, however, it does
                    not fully support some of the wider conclusions. The view of the pre-1390
                    manuscript culture, for example, is slightly oversimplified, and some claims
                    about the wider transition from manuscript to print would need further work and
                    wider scope to sustain.</p>
    <p>The third chapter, "The Beghards in the Sixteenth Century," engages less with the
                    Beghard community as a whole, but rather explores another "chopped" manuscript,
                    ascribed, through the author's careful analysis, to the Maastricht Beghards.
                    Compiled c.1525, its examination supports a fascinating comparison between the
                    two books, unearthing the significant transformations which took place over the
                    first decades of the sixteenth century. While printed images from across the
                    period were deployed in the latter book, its design reveals how the c.1500
                    experimental fusion of the two media had matured into a more uniform production
                    process. Images which had been bought pre-painted, were now coloured in-house to
                    ensure a uniform colouring scheme. The contents of the two books also suggest a
                    decline in the importance of indulgences and a rise in Rosary devotions.</p>
    <p>"Manuscripts with Prints," the final chapter (which also serves as a coda to the
                    book), comprises a whistle-stop tour of other Dutch late medieval and early
                    modern books which combine manuscript and print. We follow the author across
                    Europe, trawling through collections for hybrid books. This revealed an array of
                    fascinating books, each could easily furnish a chapter on its own accord (and
                    indeed, some featured in the author's other publications). The books range from
                    lavish and better-known books such as the Hours of Charles d'Angoulême, to a
                    virtual pilgrimage guide of Dominican nuns. The chapter also explores the works
                    of the prolific Israhel van Meckenem, whose printed images appear in manuscripts
                    across the period. Through the prism of print and manuscript, this study reveals
                    how his work has helped shape the way manuscripts were made. He created instant
                    initials and miniatures to be deployed in handwritten devotional books; these
                    were printed in sheets combining several roundels side-by-side, alongside
                    Israhel's signature. The author suggests these sheets could have also functioned
                    whole as collectors' items, cherished in the late fifteenth century as they were
                    in the nineteenth. Their iconography suggests an additional use as devotional
                    objects. The chapter ends in a short conclusion, which addresses the way we
                    adapt to new technologies. This applies to the advent of print in the later
                    Middle Ages, as to the author's own experience, with the rise of digital
                    technologies revolutionising manuscript studies in the early twenty-first
                    century. The latter transformation is evident in the book's digital appendix, an
                    elaborate excel document made by the author in her reconstruction of the c.1500
                    Beghards' Book of Hours, which details each page, its text, image, and known
                    whereabouts.</p>
    <p>This is only one way of viewing this book. It is also a personal account, in
                    which the art historian becomes a continuation of her object of research. It is
                    a story of an obsession, which brought the author time and again, with little
                    money (a prominent theme in the book) and in addition to her academic
                    requirements, to study these manuscripts. Unlike other scholarly books, or
                    academic discourse as a whole, the author is candid about the limitations of her
                    research, the prolonged process, and the obstacles encountered. It is
                    refreshing, and very edifying, to learn of the dead ends and the difficulties.
                    At times the subjectivity of the researcher merges wonderfully with her topic of
                    research, as, for example, in a narration of the author's visit, post major
                    surgery, to examine a manuscript whose iconography and contents lead her to
                    ascribe it to a late medieval convent whose sisters staffed the local hospital.
                    In the fourth chapter the locations where manuscripts are investigated give rise
                    to autobiographical recollections about street performances or remote
                    collections. The author often identifies and laments the obstacles to
                    research--the price of images, the salaries of cultural workers, or the
                    incompatibility of research funding with the actual research. These are often
                    made as an aside, and one would wish them to take a more prominent role (the
                    cost of images, for example, was expanded by the author in a short piece in the
                    Times Higher Education, August 29, 2019). These discussions are crucial facets
                    of our work, and ones which need to be addressed if we truly wish to make our
                    disciplines truly inclusive.</p>
    <p>The author's discoveries would make this work of great interest to late medieval
                    and early modern art historians, to book historians, both of manuscript and
                    early print, and to those interested in religious history and the history of
                    reading. While its tone and images enhance its appeal to undergraduates and
                    non-academics, this is hindered by a lack of translations for some sources
                    (German is translated, French is not, and Dutch at times) and complex
                    terminology. Personally, I would ascribe this book to all my graduate students
                    who work on manuscripts, prints or objects. In its in-depth research and honest
                    discussions, the book introduces book- or object-centred research. It relates
                    how important it is to look beyond the object itself, and explore institutions,
                    conservation and cataloguing practices, and unfolds the value of liaising with
                    curators and conservators. The author's creation of the database exemplifies how
                    widely available technologies can support primary research. Furthermore, the
                    need to visit and re-visit collections (a tendency which I also share with the
                    author) is well presented, as is the long and often nebulous process of
                    discovery. Lastly, the mental strain, and the investment of time and money
                    necessary for conducting research, are matters we should be discussing honestly
                    and openly with our students and our colleagues.​</p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
