<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">20.08.35</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>20.08.35, Rouzeau, Morimond</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Sheila  Bonde and Clark Maines</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>Brown University / Wesleyan University</aff>
          <address>
            <email>Sheila_Bonde@brown.edu</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020">
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Rouzeau, Benoît</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Morimond: archéologie d'une abbaye cistercienne, XIIe-XVIIIe siècles, Archéologie Espaces Patrimoines</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
        <publisher-loc>Paris, France</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Presses Universitaires Nancy</publisher-name>
        <page-range>pp. 291</page-range>
        <price>€29.00</price>
        <isbn>978-2-8143-0-317-1</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2020 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p/>
    <p>Founded in 1117 on the site of a hermitage, the abbey of Morimond was one of the
                    four daughter houses of Cîteaux. The abbey, located in a liminal zone between
                    the Lorraine, the Champagne and Burgundy, remained important to Cistercian
                    monasticism from its inception until its destruction during and after the French
                    Revolution. Despite its importance, Morimond has been understudied until
                    recently. A series of conferences (and publication of their acts) beginning in
                    the 1990's and the creation of an association, Les Amis de l'abbaye de Morimond
                    led to renewed interest in the abbey. It was during the same period that Benoît
                    Rouzeau began his studies of Morimond, which led to the beginning of the
                    programmed excavations that he directed from 2003 to 2014 and 2016-2017. This
                    volume is the result of more than 25 years of study and nearly a decade and a
                    half of excavation.</p>
    <p><italic>Morimond: Archéologie d'une abbaye cistercienne</italic> is both a
                    synthetic excavation report and a presentation of the material culture of the
                    abbey, mostly from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. Rouzeau begins the
                    volume with a review of scholarship on the abbey and presentation of its
                    regional context: geology, topography, location of diocesan boundaries, and the
                    distribution of castles and other ecclesiastical establishments as well as
                    Cistercian houses in the affiliations of Cîteaux, Clairvaux and Morimond. All of
                    these are illustrated with clear, scaled maps.</p>
    <p>Rouzeau then turns to a summary presentation of the circumstances of Morimond's
                    foundation and its early development through its periods of flourishing to the
                    community's demise in the French Revolution. This is followed by a brief
                    description of the buildings of the monastery that remain in elevation on the
                    site.</p>
    <p>In the most important and compelling section of the book, Rouzeau presents the
                    history of Morimond's water management system from its beginnings in the twelfth
                    century to its final phase of development in the eighteenth. Like many early
                    Cistercian establishments, Morimond was a site well-endowed with water and rich
                    in hydraulic features. The monastery sits on a valley floor surrounded by
                    uplands that are filled with small streams and springs feeding into a modest
                    river that runs through the site. Rouzeau describes the creation of a series of
                    four interconnected ponds that impounded water, and the ditches dug in the
                    forests to channel water to them. Outflow from this system fed an enormous
                    fishpond within the precincts. From the fishpond, water was channeled through
                    the monastic site by a giant collector sewer. As part of the same system,
                    Rouzeau details the construction of secondary and tertiary sewers that emptied
                    into the first, all of which were necessary to controlling the use and removal
                    of water. Many of the smaller sewers and drains pass under the monastic
                    buildings so that their construction, as Rouzeau convincingly argues, needed to
                    precede construction of the buildings themselves. Through a combination of
                    documentary sources and on-site investigation, Rouzeau was able to locate five,
                    and possibly six, mills--three outside the monastic enclosure as well as two,
                    and perhaps three, within it. He suggests that each had a different
                    function--grinding of grain, tanning, fulling, etc.--thus permitting the
                    Cistercian community to meet all of its own needs while remaining isolated from
                    the secular world.</p>
    <p>A further aspect of water management concerns the identification of no fewer than
                    nine springs located within the enclosure on the rising land south of the
                    church. These springs were captured in constructed conduits that provided the
                    potable water necessary for kitchen use as well as for ritual use at the lavabo
                    in the cloister, the latter located by geophysical prospection. In a separate
                    section at the end of the book, Rouzeau focuses on the transformation of the
                    hydraulic system during the reconstruction of the abbey in the eighteenth
                    century. Notable was the replacement of the fishpond by an elaborate<italic>parterre</italic> which was enveloped by an enormous U-shaped
                    water basin that, in turn, necessitated the construction of a second major
                    collector sewer to service it. This second major sewer ran beneath the cloister
                    to rejoin the first west of the church and claustral ranges. Its construction
                    necessitated opening the floors of both the eastern and western claustral
                    ranges.</p>
    <p>Throughout his analysis of the water management system, Rouzeau draws comparisons
                    with similar features known at other Cistercian sites, especially in France,
                    England and Germany. The discussion is well-illustrated with photographs,
                    section and elevation drawings, and a series of plans that locate the various
                    types of water features on the site. The importance of Rouzeau's work on
                    Morimond's water management system lies in the completeness of information about
                    how water was captured, distributed, used and evacuated from a single Cistercian
                    site. </p>
    <p>In the second section of the book, Rouzeau turns to the architecture of the site,
                    reviewing what is known textually and iconographically about destroyed
                    buildings, and incorporating the results of Henri-Paul Eydoux's limited
                    excavations in 1953-1954. Geophysical prospection of the entire enclosure
                    provided a framework for Rouzeau's investigations. While Rouzeau did not
                    excavate within the church (Morimond II) or in the cloister or claustral ranges,
                    he and his team did make an important contribution to the study of the church.
                    What survives is a two and a half bay section of the north side-aisle wall.
                    Rouzeau and his collaborators produced fully-measured elevation drawings for the
                    surviving wall, both on the interior and on the exterior, identifying two
                    portals that led into the cloister. They recorded layers of painted gesso,
                    masons' marks and construction marks on individual blocks. They also identified
                    various mortars used in the walls for its construction, restoration and repairs.
                    This work is described verbally and presented in elevation drawings and
                    photographs. To the average reader, this may not be not exciting information,
                    but it is essential as a record of the state of the monument, preserving that
                    record for the future.</p>
    <p>Unfortunately, Rouzeau and his team did not reopen any of Eydoux's trenches from
                    the 1950's. Doing so would have afforded them the opportunity to establish
                    circulation levels (above mean sea level) and to link older information to new
                    work. Rouzeau did excavate just outside the presumed location of the south
                    side-aisle of the nave of Morimond II (MII), revealing a wall running parallel
                    to the presumed south side-aisle wall of MII. Rouzeau questions whether this is
                    the actual wall of the south side-aisle of MII, which side-aisle would then be
                    wider than its opposite on the north side, or whether it might be the wall of
                    Morimond I (MI), generally presumed to have been built well east of MII. Small
                    trenches such as this one often raise more questions than they answer. We would
                    simply observe that the existence of MI and MII are based as much on two
                    documented church consecrations (1154 and 1253) as on existing masonry. The
                    multiple phases of Morimond's construction biography may be much more
                    complicated.</p>
    <p>The main focus of Rouzeau's excavations was a group of connected buildings
                    located alongside the great collector sewer, west of the church and cloister.
                    Rouzeau plausibly identifies this set of four buildings as the abbey <italic>hôtellerie</italic> complex (guest facilities) based on location,
                    size of the buildings, interior divisions, evidence for function and comparison
                    with other Cistercian sites. Excavation was carried out as an open-area
                    operation and recording proceeded in the same way as recording of the surviving
                    parts of the church. Differences in phases of construction among the buildings,
                    as well as the presence or absence of vaulting or fireplaces, were identified.
                    Walls were recorded inside and out, identifying blocked and new openings and
                    connections between the structures. The buildings were erected in sequence:
                    "Building D" is dated to the late twelfth century largely on the basis of coin
                    finds. "Building E" is dated to 1228-1248 on the basis of dendrochronology of a
                    wooden drain within it. "Building A," the earliest in the sequence, is dated to
                    1160 to 1190 on the basis of the style of carved elements from within it.
                    Evidence in this case is complicated. Carbon-14 analysis of mortar from the
                    building yielded a date of 1140 to 1160, while coin and pottery from foundation
                    levels suggested an early thirteenth-century date. It is unclear why style was
                    chosen as providing a preferred date, particularly since carved elements can be
                    stockpiled and used later, or brought from elsewhere. The function of "Building
                    C," a long, narrow structure which extended from the <italic>hotellerie</italic> group all the way to the western claustral range, remains
                    unclear. Following a period of difficulties in the sixteenth and seventeenth
                    centuries, only three of these buildings survived, and their functions changed
                    from guest facilities to artisanal and other uses. "Building A" was divided into
                    three different functional units: a forge, a stock room and a stables.</p>
    <p>The quarry for the two types of stone used in these buildings was identified by
                    Rouzeau's collaborators. The source of the limestone was located at a distance
                    of 30 km, while the <italic>grès</italic> (a dense sandstone) was
                    evidently quarried locally. Chemical analysis of a sample of decorated floor
                    tile, roof tiles and bricks was related to local clay deposits and the location
                    of the abbey's tileries. </p>
    <p>The remaining section of the book presents material culture recovered from the
                    excavations, largely from the <italic>hôtellerie</italic> complex. More
                    than 2700 sherds of pottery were brought to light and studied by vessel type,
                    firing type, etc. Only in three cases was it possible to provide
                    archaeologically complete profiles, clear testimony of secondary and tertiary
                    deposits rather than primary ones. Where possible, dating was made on the basis
                    of regional comparisons, the best of which come from the Lorraine. Most of the
                    sherds belonged to the fifteenth century with smaller amounts of residual
                    medieval, and early modern sherds. A limited physio-chemical analysis of the
                    most common types of ceramic vessels revealed no connection with local clays,
                    suggesting that pottery was imported. </p>
    <p>Table glassware finds were comparatively rich, some dating to the late
                    fourteenth/early fifteenth centuries but most from sixteenth. A selection of
                    this material was presented photographically. The vessel types compared
                    favorably to those of the three regions that surround Morimond. Since the types
                    are generally known, we would have preferred drawings that "hung" the sherds on
                    an outline of the vessel. While the photographs are revealing and beautiful,
                    they say little about the vessel as a complete object.</p>
    <p>Metal objects provide perhaps the most archaeologically important ensemble among
                    the material culture. Iron objects included locks, keys, kitchen tools,
                    agricultural tools, nails and various types of rings. Copper based objects
                    included items of clothing--buttons, pins, a thimble, a belt end, a bracelet
                    fragment--as well as a (cow) bell and part of a bridle. Most of this material
                    came from strata dating from 1500 to 1650.</p>
    <p>Forty-nine coins, <italic>jetons</italic> (counting tokens) and two money
                    weights were recovered from the <italic>hôtellerie</italic> complex, the
                    majority of which date post-1640. The coins included medieval and early modern,
                    royal and feudal ones. Eleven coins and one <italic>jeton</italic> were
                    photographed. None were drawn. The earliest coins (1180-1220) were found in
                    occupation floors and on major circulation axes of the abbey, thus in primary
                    deposit. Fifteenth- and sixteenth-century coins were recovered from secondary
                    and tertiary deposits so that, while they attest to activity on the site, they
                    do not inform us about activity at the find locations. To end discussion of the
                    material culture on a light note, two game boards were recovered from the
                    excavations, one on slate and one on ceramic, both for <italic>jeu de
                        la marelle</italic>. </p>
    <p>The illustrative material in this volume, especially the maps, is excellent.
                    Photographs, except for historical ones, are all in color. Section and elevation
                    drawings are all scaled and clear. In some cases, the color encoding is so
                    complex that one cannot always relate the legend to the drawing. For example,
                    figure 204 shows four wall drawings with three phases of mortar indicated by
                    three shades of brown. While the plans are excellent, their orientation
                    throughout the volume is not always consistent and is thus confusing. Figure 88
                    (94), for example, shows a site plan localizing the <italic>hôtellerie</italic> complex. Figure 89 (95) is a plan of the <italic>hôtellerie</italic> complex, but it has been rotated 180°. In some cases, there
                    could have been better coordination between the orientation of a photograph and
                    its corresponding plan (e.g. p. 59, figs. 51, 52). These are, however, minor
                    complaints about a volume that is beautifully produced and full of excellent
                    images.</p>
    <p>Rouzeau's <italic>Morimond</italic> offers a valuable contribution on a
                    major Cistercian foundation that adds to the already rich literature on sites of
                    that order. The study of the water management system is one of the most complete
                    for any house and extends across all the centuries of the monastery's existence.
                    The study of the <italic>hôtellerie</italic> complex and its evolution
                    over time reflects the comparatively recent archaeological interest in the
                    quotidian aspects of the study of religious sites. This volume will be a
                    reference point for the architectural, hydraulic and material culture of the
                    abbey of Morimond. It is to be hoped that Rouzeau will continue his work on the
                    site.​</p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
