<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14.11.16</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>14.11.16, Johns, Gender, Nation and Conquest (Caroline Dunn)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Dunn</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>Clemson University</aff>
          <address>
            <email>cdunn@clemson.edu</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Johns, Susan M.</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Gender, Nation and Conquest in the High Middle Ages: Nest of
                  Deheubarth, Gender in History</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year>
        <publisher-loc>Manchester</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Manchester University Press</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. xii, 276</page-range>
        <price>$100.00 (hardback)</price>
        <isbn>9780719089992 (hardback)</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2014 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p> Touring around the castles of South Wales, one is struck by the frequent references
               to Nest, a pivotal yet shadowy figure from around the turn of the eleventh century.
               Nest was the daughter of the last king of Deheubarth, Rhys ap Tewdwr, mistress of the
               notorious philanderer Henry I of England, and grandmother of the prolific author
               Gerald of Wales. Susan M. Johns, as she notes in her preface, was also intrigued by
               Nest's story, and, happily, her interest ignited a scholarly investigation that has
               illuminated the history and legend of this prominent Welsh noblewoman. </p>
    <p> The scarcity of contemporary sources renders traditional biography impossible and
               Johns instead uses the tale of this Welsh princess, and her intricate tangle of
               cross-ethnic alliances, to view the English conquest of Wales through a gendered
               lens. She takes issue with the standard periodization of Welsh history, which
               categorizes the eleventh through thirteenth centuries as the "Age of Princes," and
               highlights the central role of Nest, as well as other Welsh noblewomen, within
               relevant power structures, thereby returning them to a story that for too long has
               focused only on relations between men. Given the prominence of the Welsh kin group,
               and the centrality of family feuds in shaping Welsh (and English) history, the
               importance of women, not merely as breeders, cannot be denied. </p>
    <p> Johns thus offers an analysis of Nest's role in the events of the early Norman
               forays into Wales, highlights the political prominence of other high-medieval Welsh
               noblewomen, and extends her inquiry to consider how early modern and modern scholars
               reimagined Nest's story in their narratives of conquest. This review will focus on
               the medieval elements of Johns' book as they are more pertinent to this audience. </p>
    <p> The first half of the monograph considers how medieval sources depict Nest's story
               as well as examples and attitudes towards other women living contemporaneously.
               Chapter 1 begins with Nest's ancestry and the earliest depiction of her kidnapping,
               as portrayed in the thirteenth-century chronicle <italic>Brut y Tywysogion</italic>.
               (Three versions of this chronicle survive.) We learn that Nest, daughter of the king
               of Deheubarth, married the Anglo-Norman lord Gerald of Windsor. The abduction
               occurred, as told by the <italic>Brut</italic> chronicle, when Nest and Gerald were
               invited to a Christmas feast hosted by King Cadwgan ap Bleddyn. Cadwgan's son Owain,
               in one version "moved by passion and love for the woman" set fire to the building
               containing the bedchamber of Nest and Gerald, and Nest both convinced her husband
               Gerald to escape and showed him how to do so (somewhat ignominiously, through the
               privies). Nest was then stolen away by Owain, who, "violated Nest and lay with her
               and then returned home." </p>
    <p> Chapter 1 also outlines Nest's later marital and sexual relations and her
               descendants. Most famous among her kin is her grandson Gerald of Wales, son of Nest's
               daughter from her marriage to Gerald of Windsor. In her lifetime Nest was wife or
               mistress to at least four men and it is surprising that Johns does not include a
               family tree, or make more of this unusual number of sexual partners and the resulting
               half-siblings. Instead, she concludes the paragraph on Nest's descendants with a
               decidedly neutral sentence: "Thus Nest was the mother of eight sons and two
               daughters" (22).</p>
    <p> Johns focuses on how different versions of the <italic>Brut</italic> offer varying
               emphases and ways of telling the abduction story, which Johns, following earlier
               scholarly tradition, considers central to the narrative of relations between the
               English and the Welsh. In particular, one text narrating the abduction writes that
               Owain forcibly raped Nest, while another mentions his seizure of Nest, with no
               depiction of carnal relations, forced or otherwise. Johns suggests that this
               difference indicates conflicted loyalties among authors of the different versions;
               since they wanted to portray Owain as a Welsh resistor of English invaders, they
               demonstrate ambivalence about his alleged crimes. The text that speaks of forced
               sexual violence has him motivated by passion, instigated by the devil. They
               acknowledge that the crime happened, but work hard to avoid portraying Owain as a
               villain. </p>
    <p> To better understand the context of Nest's abduction, Johns delves into Welsh legal
               sources to explore how the chroniclers understood marriage, rape, abduction, and the
               role of women in Welsh culture. She draws parallels between how different versions of
               the <italic>Brut</italic> seemingly conflate rape and abduction and how a similar
               conflation appears in English legal texts (although Johns' argument would benefit
               from engagement with more recent scholarship that emphasizes how rape and abduction
               are not always indistinguishable in England). It is surprising, moreover, that recent
               works on Welsh law by Sara Elin Roberts do not appear in her bibliography. Johns'
               analysis of Nest's abduction highlights several important themes, however. Nest's
               story demonstrates both her passivity and her agency--passive as a victim of
               abduction and perhaps rape, but also active in her ability to rescue her husband and
               manipulate Owain into releasing her children from captivity. Versions of the story
               also imply Nest's complicity in her abduction, or at least conflicted loyalties
               divided between her Welsh cousin and her Anglo-Norman husband. Johns concludes this
               chapter by highlighting how the tale of Nest's abduction breaks free from the other
               stories involving women in the <italic>Brut</italic>, which largely relegates women
               to spheres of marriage and genealogy. Nest's story is rare in how it also contains an
               important political component, which Johns suggests highlights the tensions in the
               area of at the time of the <italic>Brut</italic>'s composition as well as during
               Nest's lifetime. </p>
    <p> In Chapter 2 Johns explores how Nest's grandson, Gerald of Wales, depicts his
               maternal grandmother along with other powerful women in high medieval Welsh society.
               Interestingly Gerald, who acknowledges Nest's position at the center of both familial
               and political networks, avoids the story of Nest's abduction entirely. Johns suggests
               that this indicates that Gerald believed that Nest had conflicted loyalties in the
               episode. Yet he is proud to acknowledge Nest as a "founding mother" in his family
               ancestry; although he calls his kin-group the "FitzGeralds" or "Geraldines" after his
               grandfather, he places the maternal figure of Nest in a prominent position as the
               figure who produced the lineage and held the family together. Johns also examines how
               Gerald depicted other prominent women, such as Gwenllian who led an army and died on
               the battlefield in support of her husband, or the wife of the Irish chieftain Ua
               Ruairc, Derbforgaill, whose abduction prompted the Geraldine (and later English)
               invasion of Ireland. Johns emphasizes that even if Gerald of Wales displayed plenty
               of "contemporary anti-female stereotypes" (56) he also had a more nuanced approached
               towards women than many scholars have allowed. Women played important roles as
               mothers and sisters of powerful men and they were central for maintaining, not merely
               creating, political alliances. Moreover, depictions of women in both Wales and
               Ireland demonstrate the centrality of women, and sexual politics, as essential
               elements of conquest and narratives of conquest. In her examination of the
               twelfth-century chroniclers who discussed conquest in the British isles, it is
               surprising that Johns overlooked Kirsten Fenton's almost identically-titled book <italic>Gender, Nation and Conquest in the Works of William of
               Malmesbury</italic>.</p>
    <p> In the third chapter, Johns explores two additional types of sources, seals and
               charters, which illuminate the opportunities, challenges, and experiences of
               noblewomen in twelfth- and thirteenth-century Wales. She illustrates, primarily
               through two case studies analyzing the roles of Joan, wife of Llywelyn the Great, and
               Senna, wife of Gruffudd ap Llywelyn, how women wielded political and tenurial agency.
               In addition, Johns returns to the lawbooks, which, although written later than Nest's
               lifetime, demonstrate important ideas about women and queenship that relates to our
               understanding of Nest. Her depiction of marriage as a political partnership (108)
               brings to mind Theresa Earenfight's recent scholarship on medieval queens. Although
               Johns' comment that "women were at the heart of these political relationships" (105)
               probably goes too far, her exploration demonstrates the crucial intersection of
               gender, legitimacy, property, matrimonial politics, and ethnic allegiances that
               underlie Nest's legend, the experiences of other Welsh noblewomen, and the
               traditional male-dominated story of "domination and conquest."</p>
    <p> In the second part of the book, Johns moves beyond the Middle Ages to explore early
               modern and modern depictions of Nest, her legend and the role of the abduction in the
               subsequent conquest of Wales. Chapter 4 considers Tudor portrayals of Nest, Chapter 5
               examines how eighteenth- and nineteenth-century historians and travel writers
               represented her, and Chapter 6 discusses modern and contemporary representations by
               looking at both scholarly works and Nest's frequent appearances in tourism
               literature. Within each chapter, the analysis proceeds largely chronologically. For
               example, the examination of early modern scholarship by Welsh authors, in Chapter 4,
               begins with Humphrey Llywd's <italic>Cronica Walliae</italic>, finished by 1559, and
               ends with George Owen's <italic>Description of Pembrokeshire</italic>, of c.1610.
               Johns demonstrates how Tudor antiquarians linked the sexual conquest of Nest with the
               political conquest of Wales. Moreover, early modern authors recognized the importance
               of gender to issues of conquest, ethnicity, and nation-building. Implicit in Johns'
               analysis is the important question--where did the women go in the scholarly,
               male-dominated histories written in the nineteenth- and twentieth-century
               histories?--and the important recognition that earlier antiquarian scholars
               understood their significance even if they sometimes altered (primarily romanticized)
               Nest's story. Women did not entirely disappear, since the legend of Nest remained
               prominent (albeit oversimplified) in modern educational materials and tourist guides,
               but, as Johns argues explicitly, academic historians need to reevaluate the "Age of
               Princes" framework that they have developed for understanding Welsh history in the
               high medieval era. </p>
    <p> Standing apart from the overall chronological organization of Johns' book is an
               interesting seventh chapter that considers Nest's role as the Welsh "Helen of Troy,"
               as many writers have called her. Johns examines standards of physical attractiveness
               in the Middle Ages and discusses how versions of the abduction story emphasized how
               Nest's beauty, like Helen's, inflamed male passion in a manner leading to warfare and
               conquest. In the earlier chronicle narratives Nest's appearance helps readers
               understand what prompted Owain to abduct her and the subsequent political and
               military fallout of that act. Authors from the Tudor era and beyond emphasized Nest's
               beauty more for romantic reasons, while authors filled with nationalist Welsh pride
               sought to elide the sexual conquest, so that "the tawdry aspects of the abduction as
               a possible rape have been written out of modern views of the abduction in favour of a
               rose-tainted nostalgic view of the past which is based on myths" (225).</p>
    <p> By investigating one pivotal story told in many sources across different genres and
               written in different eras, Johns' analysis provides a useful guide to how genre and
               chronology shape narratives. Organizing her book around how different sources narrate
               one tale does, regrettably, lead to repetition, but perhaps this is unavoidable. As
               stated already, Johns could have expanded her scholarship, at least from what works
               are evident in her notes and bibliography, and the text of the book could benefit
               from further editing. For example, sentences are sometimes repetitive and
               contradictory (84); one paragraph that goes on for three pages (88-91); and surely
               one should substitute "history" for "travel writing" on p. 163 (when Johns has
               recently concluded her discussion of travel writing and is starting a new section on
               histories). Finally, Johns too frequently resorts to telling, not showing, that
               something "is significant" or that she is providing "a gender-based analysis." </p>
    <p> These criticisms notwithstanding, in exploring the mythology of Nest ,Johns has
               offered an important corrective to masculine-driven stories of military conquest by
               highlighting the role of women, women's sexuality, and sometimes women's agency, in
               conquest stories. Her examination of Nest is augmented by the well-grounded context
               of stories of other powerful Welsh women. Such tales parallel the relevance of the
               interplay between gender, ethnicity, and conquest in the overall relationship between
               England and Wales; Johns depicts how the Welsh were sometimes depicted as feminized
               in contrast to the masculine, conquering, English. This book is important for any
               student or scholar researching early English forays into Wales or the role of women
               in medieval Welsh society. </p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
