<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14.10.10</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>14.10.10, Harvey, Medieval Maps of the Holy Land (Theodore J. Cachey,
               Jr.)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Cachey, Jr.</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>University of Notre Dame</aff>
          <address>
            <email>tcachey@nd.edu</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Harvey. P.D.A.</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Medieval Maps of the Holy Land, </source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
        <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>The British Library</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. xvi, 160</page-range>
        <price>$75.00 (hardback)</price>
        <isbn>9780712358248 (hardback)</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2014 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p> This beautifully produced folio-format volume is presented by its author as
               representing "no more than a staging-post along the road" (ix) that will hopefully
               lead to a definitive edition covering not only the regional maps of the Holy Land
               drawn in Europe but also Islamic and Hebrew maps, and the plans of individual cities.
               It examines, in the meantime, eight regional maps of Palestine (used here as purely
               as a geographical term, with no historical or political implications) of the
               Christian tradition that originated between the late twelfth and the mid-fourteenth
               century, and that survive through various versions and derivatives taking the form of
               twenty-three individual artifacts. They are the Ashburnham Libri map, the three
               Tournai maps, Matthew Paris's Oxford map, and his Acre map, the large Burchard map,
               and the small Burchard map. All are of great interest for the history of cartography,
               and "contribute to our understanding of the way Palestine was viewed at a period when
               the Crusaders gave it particular interest, not only to chroniclers and historians
               down to the present day, but also to devout Christians throughout contemporary
               Western Europe" (i).</p>
    <p> The first four of the book's thirteen chapters are preliminary to the discussions of
               the maps. They provide concise yet detailed descriptions of the historical (Chapter
               1), literary (Chapter 2), and cartographic contexts (Chapter 3) for the medieval maps
               of Palestine analyzed in the chapters that follow, as well as a discussion of other
               medieval maps of the Holy Land that show all or much of the region (Chapter 4). These
               well-focused introductory chapters make the book more easily accessible to
               non-specialists who will want to read it, including students of art and art history,
               history, literature and religious studies. A distinguishing characteristic of the
               book is the way it meets the needs of both specialist and non-specialist audiences.
               The 76 illustrations (about half in color), for example, range from a simple map of
               Palestine showing the principal places mentioned in the book (illustration 1) to
               elaborate critical reconstructions of the palimpsests of the first and second Tournai
               maps (illustrations 26 and 28), while the references feature both the latest
               authoritative general works, such as Jonathan Riley-Smith's <italic>The
                  Crusades: A History</italic>, as well as current specialized contributions by leading
               historians of cartography such as Patrick Gautier Dalché, Catherine Delano Smith, and
               the author, among others.</p>
    <p> Each of the introductory chapters foreshadows broader research questions that are
               variously developed in the chapters that follow. What is the significance of the fact
               that, before the fifteenth century, Palestine was the only area of the world for
               which we have a significant number of regional maps? What is the relationship between
               the maps of the Holy Land examined here and the encyclopedic world map developed in
               northern France and England during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries on the one
               hand and the portolan or nautical charts on the other, whose earliest examples come
               from Italy? The question of the relationship between literary sources and the maps is
               pervasive. Biblical sources (especially Jerome and Eusebius), classical accounts of
               Palestine (by Pliny the Elder, Solinus, Martianus Capella), together with
               descriptions by late-antique and medieval authors such as Orosius, Bede, Isidore of
               Seville in the seventh century and Lambert of Saint-Omer in the twelfth all had an
               influence on the world maps in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries that played a
               major role in the making of the regional maps of the Holy Land examined here.
               Accounts of the Holy Land, of varying length and varying degrees of detail naturally
               represent essential sources for the maps of the Holy Land examined in the chapters
               that follow, in particular, the account by Burchard of Mount Sion written in the late
               thirteenth century, which is the longest and arguably the most impressive of these
               works, although a definitive critical edition of this text is currently unavailable.
               Chapter 4's reconnaissance of maps other than the eight regional maps examined in the
               book discusses potential cartographic sources, including twelfth century plans of
               Jerusalem that appeared in the Chronicles of the Crusades and the encyclopedic <italic>Floral book</italic> (<italic>Liber floridus</italic>) by Lambert of
               Saint-Omer, and the depictions of the Holy Land found on the Ebsdorf, Hereford and
               Vercelli world maps.</p>
    <p> Chapters 5 through 12 focus on the description and analysis of the maps themselves:
               the Ashburnham Libri map, late twelfth century (Chapter 5), the Tournai maps, late
               twelfth century (Chapter 6); the Oxford map of Matthew Paris, mid-thirteenth century
               (Chapter 7); the Acre map of Matthew Paris, mid- thirteenth century (Chapter 8); the
               earliest large Burchard map, circa 1300 (Chapter 9); and its derivatives, including
               the Grid Maps, 1320-1339 (Chapter 10), the later large Burchard maps, fourteenth to
               early fifteenth century (Chapter 11); and finally, the small Burchard map,
               mid-fourteenth century (Chapter 12). Each of the chapters includes an historical
               account of the provenance and material making of the artifact, a thorough review of
               the previous scholarship about the map under discussion, and a description of the
               maps' cartographic contents. The author conducts detailed readings that compare and
               contrast the maps' contents in order to uncover the relations between the different
               testimonies and the broader cartographic context, and to construct hypotheses about
               the genealogies of the maps and their sources.</p>
    <p> The provenance of the Ashburnham Libri map (Florence, Biblioteca Medicea
               Laurenziana, Ashburnham Libri ms 1882) is perhaps the most colorful of all.
               Originally among the nearly 2000 manuscripts collected and in many cases stolen by
               the notorious Guglielmo Libri (1803-1869), the map was crudely altered by Libri so as
               to appear an erotic drawing produced in a monastery (the Red Sea made to assume the
               shape of a phallus), which would have increased its sale value for collectors.
               Setting aside such alterations, an important map emerges: Europe's oldest surviving
               sheet map (besides the ninth century monastic plan of St. Gall), that is, one drawn
               on the loose piece of parchment, not on a page in a bound volume. The map records
               crusader castles that appear in no published twelfth century text nor in any known
               world map: Toron, Chateauneuf, La Feve, among others. The Ashburnham Libri map
               presents an eloquent picture of the Holy Land while much of it was in Christian
               hands; and it was a map of some beauty before it fell victim to the vandalism of
               Guglielmo Libri.</p>
    <p> Generally speaking, before <italic>Medieval Maps of the Holy Land</italic>,
               scholarly attention to the eight maps treated here has been uneven and spotty
               relative to their great importance (with the possible exception of the Matthew of
               Paris Acre map). Most of it was done more than a century ago. Only the third of the
               Tournai maps discussed in Chapter 6 had been spoken of in a work on medieval
               cartography before now. Misleadingly known as the Jerome maps, the three Tournai maps
               of Palestine are found on the last leaf of a late twelfth century manuscript
               containing two original works by Jerome and his Latin translation of the <italic>Onomasticon</italic> (London, British Library, Add. MS 10049, f. 64r,v.) The book
               belonged to St. Martin's Benedictine abbey at Tournai, now in Belgium, which is where
               the texts were copied and the maps drawn. The author finds no evidence that Jerome
               drew a map of any kind, let alone the archetypes of what Konrad Miller in 1895 first
               called the Jerome maps. A thorough analysis reveals that there are not three maps but
               four: a map of Palestine on the recto has been overlaid and replaced by a map of
               Asia, while on the verso a second map of Palestine has been so thoroughly altered as
               to create a new, third, map of Palestine. The chapter represents a first attempt at
               unraveling the tangled composition of the Tournai maps, which considered in relation
               to a twelfth century manuscript identified by Patrick Gautier Dalché in the
               Biblioteca Nazionale of Naples describing a world map that corresponds to the Tournai
               map of Asia, [1] are found to "set before us a considerable portion of a world map of
               great antiquity" (59).</p>
    <p> The influence of medieval <italic>mappae mundi</italic> on the regional maps of
               Palestine is an important focus of analysis throughout. The discussion of the Oxford
               map of Matthew Paris (Chapter 7) as well as his Acre map (Chapter 8) reveals that the
               frameworks for both were taken from a world map, as well as such characteristic
               iconographic features as the river Jordan passing straight through the Sea of
               Galilee, the figure of Lot's wife, or the star of Bethlehem. The Oxford map of
               Palestine was not a fair copy but rather a rough draft made in haste from a map to
               which Matthew had only limited access and which he may have encountered at St.
               Alban's just twenty miles northeast of London where he was a Benedictine monk, or at
               Westminster or some other monastery he visited. The map, whose most remarkable
               feature is that it has north at the top, was likely made with the intention of making
               a full copy of the exemplar at some later date. The three maps of Palestine, one of
               which is included in each one of the three volumes of Matthew's <italic>Chronica
                  majora</italic> (Greater Chronicles), feature the only plan of Acre of the thirteenth
               century, itself "a considerable achievement, imaginative and innovative" (83). The
               maps of Palestine have been interpreted to be part of a larger literary and
               iconographic program that creates an imaginative pilgrimage made up of an illustrated
               itinerary from London to South Italy, followed by the map of Palestine. [2] The maps
               of Palestine are not identical but are different versions of the same map that was
               based on a world map integrated with other sources painstakingly reconstructed here,
               including literary accounts and perhaps first-hand reports of visitors to St. Alban's
               who had been to the Holy Land.</p>
    <p> Chapter 9 treats the earliest known map to be based on Burchard of Mount Sion's
               description of Palestine (c. 1300), a book written between 1274 and 1285, and which
               survives in more than one hundred manuscript copies and fifteen printed editions by
               1624 (princeps 1475) including translations into German and French. The map's debt to
               Burchard's description becomes clear when one considers the long notes that are not
               quotations but paraphrases so close to Burchard's words that there is no doubt about
               their origin. The earliest large Burchard map (Florence, Archivio di Stato, Carte
               nautiche, geografiche e topografiche 4) is one of the outstanding monuments of
               medieval cartography (it is 5 1/2 feet long and 20 inches deep, drawn on four sheets
               of parchment), although it has been neglected, perhaps because it is badly faded. The
               map, which is beautifully illustrated here by a color fold-out reproduction, is a
               copy of an existing map, now lost, not an original production. Copied by someone with
               limited knowledge of the area, as evidenced by mistaken place names, it nonetheless
               is "a magnificent map and of great interest and importance" (103). The outlines of
               the coast, rivers and mountains appear to be entirely the original mapmakers own work
               and to reflect very considerable local knowledge.</p>
    <p> Chapter 10 discusses what are known as the "grid maps," which are nine maps of
               Palestine associated with the project of a new crusade to restore Christian rule to
               the Holy Land after the fall of Acre in 1291 that was promoted throughout Europe
               between 1321 and 1332 by Marino Sanudo the Elder. Sanudo's <italic>Book of
                  secrets of those faithful to the Cross</italic> (<italic>Liber secretorum
                  fidelium cruces</italic>) included an atlas of maps that "played an important part in
               Sanudo's argument in favor of a crusade, enabling his strategy to be easily
               visualized at successive levels of detail" (112). These included a map of Palestine,
               as well as plans of Jerusalem and Acre. All the original maps were drawn in Venice in
               the workshop of Pietro Vesconte of Genoa, one of the most important figures in the
               early development of the portolan chart and six of them are all or partly in his
               hand. Some of these maps reappear in four manuscripts of the <italic>Great
                  chronology</italic> (<italic>Chronologia magna</italic>) by Paolino Veneto, two of
               which include the map of Palestine.</p>
    <p> The most striking feature of the nine "grid maps" of Palestine executed in Venice
               and Naples between 1320 and 1339 is a grid of 28 squares from east to west, 83 from
               north to south. There is no parallel in contemporary or earlier European maps.
               Vesconte or Sanudo realized that such a grid might be used not just to copy the map
               accurately, but to provide a guide to the places on the map. In the later versions of
               the <italic>Book of secrets</italic> Sanudo explained this innovative idea, which is
               analogous to today's tourist maps on which the grid serves as a finding tool for
               places on the map. There are few differences between the nine maps of Palestine, maps
               A to J. They are all versions of a single map, though it seems likely that two
               slightly different exemplars were used, one at Venice, the other at Naples. Naples
               map H (Paris, Bibliotèque nationale de France, ms. latin 4939, ff. 10v-11r) is
               "unquestionably the finest of all nine grid maps" (121). The source of the maps is
               without doubt a reduced version of the large Burchard map.</p>
    <p> Chapter 11 discusses three later large Burchard maps from between the fourteenth and
               the early fifteenth centuries, held by the Pierpont Morgan (MS M. 877), the state
               archives in Bruges (Chartes avec número bleu 11458), and in the Bodleian Library at
               Oxford (MS Douce 389). Through a very detailed philological investigation of the maps
               the author finds that the Pierpont Morgan map and the Bruges fragments repeat
               mistakes found in the Archivio di Stato large Burchard map, while the Douce map seems
               to stem from a better copy of the original map that lay behind the grid maps. Thus
               there appear to have been two lines of copies stemming from the original large
               Burchard map. The grid maps and Douce map belong to the more correct one, while the
               other large maps and the Bruges fragment belong to the other. All these maps derived
               from a single map that must have been one of the most remarkable achievements of
               medieval mapmaking. A contemporary of the Hereford and Ebstorf world maps, this map
               represented a completely different kind of cartography: "Whether the mapmaker worked
               from Burchard's text or from personal knowledge or from both--and it is not
               impossible that he was Burchard himself, it was the direct graphic representation of
               a region, not a compilation of earlier sources constructed in the study" (139).</p>
    <p> Chapter 12 takes up the small Burchard map from the mid-fourteenth century today
               found in Florence (Biblioteca Laurenziana, ms Plut. 76.56, ff. 97v-98r). It is the
               only copy to survive of the small Burchard map in a manuscript volume where it
               accompanies a copy of the full version of Burchard's text. Unfortunately, the map is
               full of errors and misplaced names. Nonetheless, there is the possibility that the
               small Burchard map derives, albeit in travestied form, from the map that Burchard
               himself sent to his friend, also named Burchard, a Dominican friar in Magdeburg along
               with the short version of his text (and that other copies might still exist). The
               only published account is a short description by Reinhold Röhricht in 1898 who
               followed his description with accounts of two late fifteenth century maps that he
               associated with Burchard's text. To these the author adds a third, from the early
               sixteenth century, and the balance of the chapter is dedicated to a detailed
               comparison with these. Tantalizingly, the maps while related are so different as to
               suggest that many more derived from an original archetype (and might remain to be
               discovered).</p>
    <p> A brief Conclusion (Chapter 13, pp. 155-156) follows, which in keeping with the
               "work in progress" orientation of the volume, rather than drawing major conclusions
               points to further work that needs to be undertaken focusing on the eight maps
               examined here and their cartographic context, including the literary background. But
               the groundbreaking work accomplished in the meantime by this splendid volume will no
               doubt prove to be a fundamental point of reference for future research. </p>
    <p> --------</p>
    <p> Notes:</p>
    <p> 1. Patrick Gautier Dalché, "Eucher de Lyon, Iona, Bobbio: le destin d'une mappa
               mundi de l'antiquité tardive," <italic>Viator</italic> 41 (2010): 1-22.</p>
    <p> 2. Daniel K. Connolly, "Imagined pilgrimage in the itinerary maps of Matthew Paris,"
                  <italic>Art Bulletin</italic> 81 (1999): 598-622.</p>
    <p/>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
