<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14.04.16</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>14.04.16, Edwars &amp; Da Rold, eds., English Manuscripts Before 1400 (Richard Gameson)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Gameson</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>Durham University</aff>
          <address>
            <email>richard.gameson@durham.ac.uk</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Edwards., A.S.G. and Orietta Da Rold</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>English Manuscripts Before 1400, English Manuscript Studies 1100-1700 Volume 17</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
        <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>British Library Publications</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. vi, 302</page-range>
        <price>$75.00</price>
        <isbn>9780712358835</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2014 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>
The volume begins (without Introduction or Preface) with George
Young's discussion of a collection of homiletic and other texts in
Old English that was copied in the mid-twelfth century; he suggests
that it may have been designed either for new monastic recruits or
for monks responsible for pastoral care, perhaps associated with
Christ Church, Canterbury. Next, D. A. Woodman explores how "Anglo-
Saxon" traditions were fabricated at Beverley in the fourteenth
century (via a Middle English rhyming charter and a cartulary) in
response to contemporary concerns; whereafter Michael Gullick
continues his exploration of script at Christ Church in the
generations after the Norman Conquest, here focusing on texts and
documents in Old English. His contribution is the only one in the
volume to be accompanied by images of relevant script that are
reproduced at actual size.</p>
    <p>Complementing his technical account in the recently published
catalogue of medieval and Renaissance manuscripts in Princeton
University Library (Princeton University Press, 2013), Don Skemer
treats a genealogical roll that belonged to a certain Frater
Richard Bury. He argues that the individual in question was not the
famous Chancellor or England and bibliophile Bishop of Durham of
that name (d. 1345), associated with the <italic>Philobiblon</italic>, but
rather the altogether obscurer precentor of the Benedictine abbey
of St John the Baptist in Colchester. If the attribution is
correct, this will be only the sixth book that is associable with
that Essex house. Skemer further suggests that this and similar
genealogical rolls "were intended to be portable outline histories
for working monastic administrators" (77).</p>
    <p>Lucy Sandler presents a late thirteenth-century versified manual of
religious instruction in Anglo-Norman French, looking in particular
sketches in its margins whose subject-matter ranges from knights
and minstrels to biblical scenes and a studious cleric. The
drawings make the further point that the iconographic interest of
illustrations can be independent of their artistic quality--which
is modest at best in this case. Philip Shaw then studies the
metrical chronicle attributed to Robert of Gloucester, stressing
the complexity of its textual tradition. Thereafter, Kathryn Lowe
discusses the most frequently copied of Anglo-Saxon charters (S980,
a forgery purportedly issued by Cnut for Bury St Edmunds, 1021x23),
of which no fewer than thirty-six versions survive; she looks in
particular at a single-sheet "facsimile" version made in the
fifteenth century, relating its production to a contemporary
dispute between Bury and Ely.</p>
    <p>Andrew Prescott offers an engaging variation on a theme he has been
promulgating for thirty years (cf. pp. 262 and 277, n. 1), namely
the quantity of documentary records as opposed to literary
manuscripts from medieval England, and the corresponding importance
of the former as opposed to the latter as a measure of the
country's levels of literacy. Jennifer Jahner looks at the
transmission of works relating to the Second Barons' War of 1264-7;
however, how far the juxtaposition of these texts with other
material in their manuscript contexts (most famously the <italic>Song of
Lewes</italic> with <italic>Sumer is icumen in</italic>) is the result of
deliberate design as opposed to other factors, not least
serendipity, is difficult to say.</p>
    <p>The last few papers are even more varied in subject matter. Aidan
Conti shifts the focus to antiquarianism, unearthing an instance of
the seventeenth-century Cambridge linguist Abraham Wheelock, well
known for his study of Old English, scrutinising a Middle English
manuscript instead. Erik Kwakkel turns to codicology, surveying the
deployment of smaller pieces of parchment (as opposed to whole
sheets or skins) to make individual folios--be they as supports for
notes, for inserts, or even for runs of pages in 'ordinary'
volumes. Mark Chambers and Louise Sylvester then report on a
linguistic project that is in progress, studying the vocabulary
used for textiles and clothing in petitions to parliament and in
accounts of the royal wardrobe. Finally, A. S. G. Edwards offers a
few general reflections on recent trends in the study of English
manuscripts c. 1200-c. 1350; this is a revised version of an
address given in 2010 at a conference in Leicester that was
presumably the catalyst for some of the other articles here
gathered.</p>
    <p>Special issues of a journal with a particular focus sometimes
manage to be more than the sum of their parts. Such is not the case
here. Relevant specialists will doubtless profit from each chapter;
however, no-one but a reviewer is likely to read more than isolated
articles in this pot-pourri of uneven interest, and nor will they
thereby be impoverishing themselves. The one general theme that
runs through several of the articles (Yonge, Woodman, Skemer, Lowe,
Prescott and Conti) is changing attitudes to "old" texts and
documents in subsequent eras, but even here the congruity is
coincidental rather than synergistic. </p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
