<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14.04.15</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>14.04.15, Timmons &amp; Boenig, eds., Gonzalo de Berceo and the Latin Miracles of the Virgin (Paul E. Larson)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Larson</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>Baylor University</aff>
          <address>
            <email>Paul_Larson@baylor.edu</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Timmons, Patricia and Robert Boenig</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Gonzalo de Berceo and the Latin Miracles of the Virgin: A Translation and a Study, </source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
        <publisher-loc>Burlington, VT</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Ashgate</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. 189</page-range>
        <price>$89.96</price>
        <isbn>978-1-4094-4190-8</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2014 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>
A wonderful compendium to the study of Berceo's miracle stories, this
new study by Timmons and Boenig offers medieval scholars a look into
the sources that inspired Berceo's work. By publishing both the Latin
texts that Berceo probably had on hand as he wrote his vernacular
versions of the miracles and, ironically, modern English translations
of those Latin texts so that any scholar or student may readily access
those original Latin texts, the authors open up a new line of inquiry
regarding both Berceo's creativity and his originality. In a sense,
Timmons and Boenig are doing the same thing that Berceo did: translate
the difficult Latin texts so that more people would have access to
them. The book revolves around the hypothesis that Berceo had access
to a Latin language manuscript that contained the same stories as MS
Thott 128 (Copenhagen), and that he used that manuscript as the
inspiration and basis for his famous miracle collection: <italic>Los
milagros de Nuestra Señora</italic>. By offering scholars both the original
Latin texts of that medieval manuscript and a modern English
translation of those texts, the authors lay bare the creative process
of Berceo, exposing his elisions, suppressions, and additions as he
spun out his vernacular poetry versions of these pious short
narratives.</p>
    <p>For those who already have read the Berceo's stories, we know that he
addresses the relationship between people, their sins, and God, and
how Mary and Jesus mediate that relationship. The medieval imagination
of Berceo turns rather matter-a-fact Latin prose narratives, which can
be read here, into a lively group of Marian miracles which have been
luxuriously fleshed out by the Spanish poet. Some of our best hispano-
medievalists--Gerli, Borland, Reilly, Dutton, Keller, Deyermond--have
traded thrusts and parries with the Riojan poet, trying to explain the
magic of the <italic>mester de clerecia</italic> poetry, rhymed quatrains of
fourteen syllables, which tell the human stories of ego, pride, shame,
and, finally, redemption. Berceo infuses his poetic narratives with
humor and pathos, creating stories with which listeners might relate
their own lives and faith journeys. The stories, the art of Berceo,
all swirl around the image of Mary as a powerful spiritual figure, the
mother of God, immaculate, as redemptress and intermediary between her
son, Jesus Christ and the world of Christian believers on Earth.
Within the Christian worldview of these stories, Mary wields enormous
power with her son to grant mercy to a host of sinners who are, in
effect, his audience. The very fact the Berceo takes time to translate
the miracles at all speaks both to his broad vision as a spiritual
writer and his enormous creativity as an artist. Similarly, the
inclusion of both new English translations of the miracles and the
original Latin speaks to a broader vision of the authors concerning
literary theory, translation, and interpretation.</p>
    <p>In their original Latin form, the stories simply and flatly chronicle
the lives of regular people--monks, priests, laborers, thieves,
pilgrims, and the poor. Yet, the Latin sources are not for public
consumption in the sense that while keeping them in Latin, the stories
could only be read by monks, priests, scribes, a small circle of
educated people who could contemplate human weakness, the ensuing
crisis, and redemption in the form of Mary, a humble human being who
was chosen by God as a special person within the Christian
imagination. Berceo was daring enough to risk translating those Latin
prose narratives into a lively collection of short stories that to
this day capture our imaginations, intrigue our intellects, and bear
up under the tightest scrutiny concerning human behavior, even at its
venal worst. The pantheon of human failings which are chronicled by
these stories is vast and breath-taking from the simplest narratives
concerning the resolute kindness of a very poor man who gives his last
dime to others to an extended and complicated analogue of the Faust
story in which a man denounces his faith in God, rejects his salvation
in Jesus Christ, and signs his soul over to the devil in order to get
his old job back. Within that wide gamut of stories we might read
about an alcoholic priest, a womanizer, a cheater, a priest who
denounces his vows, a shipwrecked pilgrim who sacrifices himself to
save others, or a pilgrim who, tricked by the Devil, commits suicide
before reaching his destination.</p>
    <p>By making these texts accessible, Timmons and Boenig are undressing
and demystifying the creative process of a medieval author such as
Berceo who was involved in both translation and creation. By including
new English language translation of the Latin, the authors are
problematizing the practice of translation (especially for themselves)
and the parallel act of creation, since no translation will ever
remain faithful to its source. In other words, the English
translations of the Latin are of an unadorned variety which naively
pretends to neither subtract nor add to the literature and supposes
that little is either gained or lost in the process. Yet, translations
are, by definition, new texts, and just as Berceo's work was new, so
are the texts proffered by Timmons and Boenig. Berceo's theory of
translation is an ongoing mediation between the Latin in the
manuscript and the new story he is writing. In order to share the
Latin language miracles with a broader audience than just his inner
circle of Latin speakers, Berceo created something new that was both a
loyal expression of the original stories and a new vehicle for his
pro-Marian point of view that would then reach a broader audience of
non-Latin speaking pilgrims and followers. During Berceo's thirteenth
century, outside of the monasteries and churches and the educated
elites, any use of classical Latin had disappeared and spoken
<italic>romance</italic> was the <italic>lingua franca</italic> of the region, so what
better way to divulge more widely these miracles than to translate
them into <italic>romance</italic>? By examining the original Latin and the new
English translation with Berceo's work in Castilian, one gets the
sense that his theory of translation seems to be both broad and loose,
at times, brazen, as he changes the circumstances of his characters,
manipulating plot lines, inventing dialogues, moralizing, adding
additional information and suppressing details in order to write a
more perfect story. Was what Berceo was doing a translation? Or was he
freely re-writing the Latin the sources, using them only as a starting
point for his own versions of the stories? The question of translation
underpins the creative process for the cleric who is essentially
creating a new analogue of the same story--the bare bones of the story
are essentially the same, but the language, the details, and the tone
of the story are changed, which in turn changes the meaning of the
story for both Berceo and his audience.</p>
    <p>This compendium to Berceo studies also contextualizes--historically,
religiously, socially--the thirteenth-century milieu in which Berceo
was writing. Beyond translating, the exercise of creating new miracle
stories is a spiritual one for Berceo, and Timmons and Boenig
constantly remind their readers that these stories do not appear in a
vacuum, and that the religious context and spiritual practices matter
while reviewing the historical importance of Marian miracles in the
Middle Ages. Abundant footnotes and critical references anchor their
essays, including "The Life and Times of Gonzalo de Berceo and His
Audience," in the current context of medieval Spanish literature,
thought, and criticism. In other words, they read the miracles as more
than just artifacts from another time, locating them, instead, within
their hispano-medieval context. Timmons and Boenig include short
essays on six of Berceo's miracle stories, demonstrating the
importance of the Latin sources as a gloss to Berceo's work. By
analyzing the differences between the Latin and the Spanish, the
reader or critic can begin to understand those issues that Berceo felt
strongly about as he emphasized certain aspects of the Latin miracles
while erasing others. The authors offer a quick look at the
"Fornicating Sexton," "The Wedding and the Virgin," "The Jews of
Toledo," "The Little Jewish Boy," and "The Pregnant Abbess," all
stories which are seminal to understanding the rest of the
<italic>milagros</italic>, and are all emblematic examples of different kinds of
miracle stories.</p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
