<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14.04.07</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>14.04.07, Cochelin and Smyth, eds., Medieval Life Cycles (Renate Blumenfeld-Kosinski)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Blumenfeld-Kosinski</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>University of Pittsburgh</aff>
          <address>
            <email>renatebk80@gmail.com</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Cochelin, Isabelle and Karen Smyth</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Medieval Life Cycles: Continuity and Change, International Medieval Research 18</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year>
        <publisher-loc>Turnhout</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Brepols</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. xx, 357</page-range>
        <price>€90.00</price>
        <isbn>978-2-503-54069-6</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2014 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>
Age is relative. The perception of how old you are is conditioned by
your gender, your health, your status in life, and of course by the
age you are when you are asked a question as to how old you feel.
Nonetheless, throughout the centuries there has been a desire to
classify and fix people's age. In a recent survey of 1,800 Americans
aged 40 to 90, both men and women agreed that a man is old at age 70,
while for women the outcome was slightly different: men said women are
old at 68, while women judged women to be old at age 75. And while
people in their forties said they consider 63-year olds old, people in
their seventies pinpointed old age at 75. [1]  Furthermore, almost
half the people surveyed believed that they looked younger than their
age. This preoccupation with classifying old age--and concomitantly
youth, maturity, and other points of the human life cycle--is an age-
old phenomenon. From Tertullian in the third century CE to Sicard in
the twelfth over eighty authors tried to pin down the ages of man, but
not generally of woman. These two authors represent the bookends of
the extremely useful list with which Isabelle Cochelin opens this
interesting and challenging volume.</p>
    <p>The ten papers assembled here originated at the 2005 Medieval Congress
at the University of Leeds whose theme was Age and Youth. The
methodology and sources used span a wide range, from archeology to
close readings of literary texts, to iconography and the scrutiny of
monastic documents and merchants' letters. Unfortunately no
information on the contributors appears in this volume. The time frame
extends from Anglo-Saxon times to the sixteenth century;
geographically the focus is principally on England but several
articles venture onto the continent, mostly France and Germany. Given
the heterogeneity of the source materials and approaches to them, no
unified conclusion emerges from the book.</p>
    <p>The Introduction by Isabelle Cochelin provides us with a glimpse of
eighty-three sources (including a few non-Western ones, for whom
"decrepitude" starts considerably earlier than in Western sources,
usually around sixty!) that divided the human life span into four,
five, six, or seven stages and assigned ages to each of them. What is
striking is that monastic and secular definitions of the different
life stages differ, the latter drawing more clearly on scientific and
medical perspectives. Cochelin observes that before the eleventh
century the concept of adulthood or middle age was largely absent from
her sources, perhaps due to a reluctance, especially by monastic
writers, to assign a "summit" to human life. Cochelin gives a brief
summary of each of the sources represented in the tables and points
out that Hildegard of Bingen was one of the very few authors to
discuss both women and men in the context of the life cycle.</p>
    <p>After the Introduction, the essays are arranged according to the life
cycle, beginning with infancy and ending with old age and decrepitude.</p>
    <p>Sally Crawford's sources are not textual but material: the bones of
dead infants. She seeks archeological evidence of rites of passage,
such as baptism, that would be reflected in burial practices in order
to determine at what point a baby became a child. Before the tenth
century infants were missing from the "mortuary population" in England
(65); it was the growing Christianization that led to more burials of
infants within church cemeteries. Unbaptized or stillborn infants were
supposed to be buried outside of consecrated ground but the presence
of their bones in Anglo-Saxon churchyards proves "that those
responsible for burying babies felt unable to comply with the cruel
burial regulations for unbaptized children" (71), such as putting a
stake through their hearts. This kind of link between archeological
evidence and people's emotions is very intriguing.</p>
    <p>Mary Dzon, in by far the longest (and nicely illustrated) article in
the volume, scrutinizes the concept of the "wanton boy" in accounts of
Christ's childhood, especially a version found in University of
Minneapolis manuscript Z822N81. An overview of the semantic field of
the word "wanton" indicates that it meant "unrestrained, uneducated,
playful sporting" (86), sometimes even sinful, but that it did not
have the sexual connotations it acquired later. Dzon also investigates
questions of gender when she compares budding male and female saints:
saintly boys can be recognized by their lack of rambunctiousness,
while saintly girls distinguish themselves by avoiding the vanity and
spitefulness evident in their playmates. So was Christ a "wanton boy?"
Yes, if we are to believe the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew preserved in
the fifteenth-century Minnesota manuscript. The Christ boy kills his
playmates and a schoolmaster (only to resurrect them later), never
does his chores, he is a know-it-all, does not pray enough, and is
rude and unteachable. Dzon places this unflattering and surprising
portrait of the wanton Christ child into the context of anti-Judaism
and incarnational theology. This text, coming from a devotional
manuscript that may very well have been a preacher's handbook, as Dzon
argues, proves that Christ was a true human, a troublesome and
"wanton" boy on the path to immortality.</p>
    <p>Isabelle Cochelin moves us from childhood to adolescence by focusing
on the changing images of adolescents emerging from four Cluniac
customaries (tenth to twelfth centuries). According to Peter the
Venerable, abbot of Cluny from 1122 to 1156, men could not "profess"
before age twenty, but they could enter the monastery. Once there, the
teenagers acquired a guardian who had to keep them separate at meals
and prayers, for example, and who helped them control their libido.
For Peter, adolescents were still children. But Cochelin traces a new
conceptualization of adolescence (ages fifteen to nineteen) in that
time period, one centered on rebellion. In hagiographic sources after
ca. 1120 we find the rebellious teenager who questions secular
authority and turns toward monasticism. The "passive" tenth-century
Odo of Cluny, for example, is now eclipsed by the active and
rebellious type of saint, like the early twelfth-century Hugh of
Semur.</p>
    <p>Jessie Sherwood also focuses on teenage rebellion, but here in the
context of Jewish converts to Christianity. She reminds her readers of
the unreliability of conversion narratives centered on teenagers (the
Jewish ones often simply reproducing the model of the adolescent
Christian saints who find their true faith as adolescents) as well as
of the flexibility of the term adolescent, which could include married
men in their late twenties. While there is only one extant documentary
reference to a child convert, exemplary tales have many of them. The
case histories (Jacob of Regensburg, Elizabeth of Linz, and Catherine
of Louvain) Sherwood presents here are of teenagers who "openly
derided their parents" (196) and converted. The juxtaposition of the
stories of Herman-Judah (probably the most studied conversion
autobiography) and Guillaume de Flaix who also wrote about his
conversion reveals that it was believed that younger converts could be
more easily molded into Christians even though they were not usually
ready to convert by themselves against their parents' wishes. Indeed,
almost all documented cases show children and adolescents converting
together with their parents.</p>
    <p>Christian Kuhn, the only male contributor to the volume, transports us
into sixteenth-century Germany into the heart of the powerful merchant
family of the Tuchers. As they do today, parents wanted to keep in
touch with their children, however far-flung they may have been. In
the Tucher family 2000 letters attest to this desire, 200 of which are
"intergenerational" (211). Kuhn's insights on this period's
educational practices come from nuanced close readings of father-son
communications, albeit limited to the elite. Being mindful of the
problem of authenticity versus normativity in these types of texts,
Kuhn shows that these letters reflect "traditional discourses and
images of generational norms" (235) but at the same time open a window
into the specificity of the Tuchers, in all their complicated and
moving family dynamics.</p>
    <p>Deborah Youngs wants to know whether medieval adulthood was seen as
the prime of life or as a midlife crisis. Unlike youth and old age,
adulthood was not "problematized" in the Middle Ages (240). There was
a sense that adulthood represented a kind of zenith, a bridge between
youth and old age that did not carry the burden of the negative
aspects associated with either of them. Adulthood was defined by its
qualities rather than by chronological age and had to be constantly
"performed and demonstrated" (250). Differentiated by gender, adults
needed to fulfill societal expectations: marriage and children for
women, professional accomplishments for men. The self-reflection and
soul searching brought about by adulthood, Youngs insists, had nothing
narcissistic about it but was a sign of the ongoing battle against
sin, exacerbated by the consciousness of being "adult."</p>
    <p>Sue Niebrzydowski focuses on a one middle-aged individual, the
ubiquitous fourteenth-century Margery Kempe. An inveterate pilgrim,
she made many journeys and this article's achievement is to pinpoint
how old Margery was for each displacement, how far she went, and for
how long. After childbearing was the ideal time for a medieval woman
to depart on pilgrimage. Table 3 reveals that in her late thirties and
forties Margery traveled widely, then spent ten years in ill health,
and resumed travel in her sixties. Many of her trips were "themed"
(281), that is attempted copies of Saint Bridget of Sweden, Angela of
Foligno, and Dorothea of Montau (not Mantau, as Niebrzydowski writes;
282). Just when the reader looks for a synthesis of the author's
findings the article ends very abruptly.</p>
    <p>With Philippa Semper's piece we finally arrive at "cold and snuffly"
old age; these are the characteristics highlighted by the
philosophical and medical discourses inherited from antiquity which
center on the decay and deterioration caused by old age.  But Semper
wants to get away from normative texts and look for other sources for
the definition of old age. She finds them in Beowulf and some Old
English and Norse poems (the dates of which are no always indicated)
where wise old heroes abound, as well as in some homiletic texts which
remind us that we will always be young in heaven! Nonetheless, we must
age on earth and it is good to be a saint, for old saints are filled
with wisdom and show endurance and experience "spiritual growth" (312)
in face of even the worst infirmities.</p>
    <p>Karen Smyth's final article is articulated along three axes: the life
cycle as related to the nation, Everyman, and the self in Lydgate's
Fall of Princes and Troy Book. Challenging accepted notions of
medieval time as cyclical and modern time as linear, Smyth presents a
complex reading of Lydgate's two works (translations are not always
provided) which shows that finally there is no "static formula" (346)
that could describe the different stages of life. In the fifteenth
century, Smyth concludes, any particular evaluation of the worth of
any stage of the life cycle over another has vanished. Different
genres and authors' goals determine what is good or bad when it comes
to a given age. This article would have benefited from some
streamlining and some signposting, especially for readers unfamiliar
with Lydgate.</p>
    <p>The editors have brought together a heterogeneous but enlightening
group of articles that illuminate the life cycle from many different
perspectives. No overarching conclusion emerges and in a way this is
the book's strength. Moving away from the normative life cycle texts
the authors demonstrate that age was just as relative in past
centuries as it is today.</p>
    <p>--------</p>
    <p>Notes:</p>
    <p>1.  AARP magazine, February-March 2014, p. 42.</p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
