<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">14.03.02</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>14.03.02, Tsougarakis, The Latin Religious Orders in Medieval Greece (Christopher H. MacEvitt)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>MacEvitt</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>Dartmouth College</aff>
          <address>
            <email>macevitt@dartmouth.edu</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Tsougarakis, Nickiphoros I.</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>The Latin Religious Orders in Medieval Greece, 1204-1500 , Medieval Church Studies, 18</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
        <publisher-loc>Turnhout</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Brepols</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. xxiii, 391</page-range>
        <price>€100.00</price>
        <isbn>978-2-503-53229-5</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2014 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>
In the wake of the Fourth Crusade, assorted Latin principalities and 
colonial powers came to rule Greece, with some areas remaining under 
Latin rule until the seventeenth century (and the Ionian Islands 
remained under Venetian control until the end of the eighteenth). The 
religious Orders of Latin Christianity--Cistercians, Franciscans, 
Dominicans, and others--followed close behind the crusaders (indeed, 
some Cistercians participated in the crusade), establishing convents 
and dependencies throughout Greece and its islands. Their presence 
lingered sometimes longer than Latin political power: the Dominicans, 
for example, maintained a community on Chios until the eighteenth 
century, hundreds of years after Genoese rule on the island had 
collapsed. Tsougarakis's book offers a detailed survey of these 
communities and their activities during the three centuries of Latin 
rule.</p>
    <p>Tsougarakis's book is clearly organized. Following an introductory 
chapter on Latin Greece--defined to encompass Constantinople and its 
immediate environs, as well as mainland Greece, the Aegean, and the 
Ionian islands--subsequent chapters examine the Cistercians and 
Benedictines, the Franciscans, the Dominicans, the Crociferi, and the 
Augustinian friars respectively, as well as a short chapter on 
assorted smaller orders, and a final chapter usefully summarizing the 
conclusions of the whole book. To the great benefit of the reader, 
each chapter begins with a map showing the locations of each group's 
churches, convents, and dependencies. Tsougarakis methodically 
discusses each convent and church, outlining the finances, leadership, 
and role in the local community. The second part of each chapter 
covers broader themes and questions particular to each group: for 
example, the role of the Dominicans in negotiations for the union of 
the Latin and Greek churches. </p>
    <p>The first chapter gives general background to Latin Greece, 
distinguishing between the territories of the Franks (or the French) 
and the Venetians. Tsougarakis does not discuss the Genoese, although 
they play a significant role in his book--they perhaps are not 
included in the first chapter because they did not play a significant 
role in the crusade. Tsougarakis places Latin Greece in the context of 
other frontier areas, such as Spain, the Baltic, and the Latin East, 
also the products of crusading efforts. He also discusses "Greco-Latin 
Relations," attending to the differences between the Frankish and the 
Venetian lands, as well as the different approaches of Greek scholars 
on the one hand and western European and American ones on the other. 
Greek scholarship, Tsougarakis asserts, has tended to emphasize the 
division between Greek and Latin, while western European and American 
scholars have paid greater attention to evidence of integration. 
Tsougarakis offers criticism of the arguments of some scholars, but 
stakes out no particular position on the larger question, preferring 
to pay attention to interaction on a smaller and more regional scale, 
though he is curiously apologetic about discussing the subject at all. 
The chapter is a fine overview of the subject, but this reader, at 
least, hoped to read how Tsougarakis's own study might contribute to 
the discussion. While it is clear his work certainly does, he is 
notably reticent to make any claims, and his contribution is too often 
implicit rather than explicit.</p>
    <p>The second chapter discusses the Cistercians and the Benedictines, who 
were the earliest to establish communities in the new territories. 
Heavily involved in the planning and execution of the Fourth Crusade, 
the Cistercians nevertheless did not flourish in Latin Greece, despite 
enthusiasm for their mission from both the papacy and the Frankish 
aristocracy. Following the work of Brenda Bolton and Elizabeth Brown, 
Tsougarakis argues that this was because the Cistercians were not able 
to follow their normal practice of establishing their convents in 
isolated rural areas, due to security concerns. Nor does there seem to 
be any evidence of <italic>conversi</italic> in Greece, suggesting that the 
Cistercians were not working their lands themselves. The Cistercians 
could not fulfill the role they had so usefully occupied in other 
frontier zones, bringing unused land into cultivation and settling 
sparsely-populated areas--in large part due to the limited land 
resources of Latin Greece, where the aristocracy, the secular church 
and monasteries all competed for land, a significant portion of which 
remained vested in Greek archontic families. One Cistercian house did 
particularly flourish--the nunnery of Percheio in Constantinople. The 
house was probably founded by the imperial family, and was the 
wealthiest monastery in Latin Greece. While this is not an explicit 
theme, Tsougarakis discusses in various places the role female 
monasteries played in Latin communities, another rich theme that 
deserves greater emphasis. Within sixty years of the conquest of 
Greece, however, the Cistercian presence had been reduced to three, or 
perhaps only one. </p>
    <p>The next two chapters are devoted to the Franciscans and Dominicans, 
respectively. The Franciscans, Tsougarakis shows, were closely allied 
with the Venetians in their territories in the Aegean, such as Crete 
and Negroponte. The Dominicans, on the other hand, tended to prosper 
in the Genoese territories, such as Chios. Both orders came into 
conflict with the secular church--indeed, Tsougarakis argues that the 
Venetians found the Franciscans convenient allies in limiting the 
power of the secular church and the papacy in their colonies. He does 
not neglect, however, the prominent role the Franciscans took as 
diplomats for the papacy, or the work of the Dominicans towards the 
union of the churches. The mendicants were seemingly far better 
endowed than the secular church, and as in other parts of the Latin 
Christian world, bishops and secular clergy bitterly resented their 
usurpation of burial rights, and the fees that went along with them. </p>
    <p>Although both orders were ideologically committed to preaching to 
heretics and schismatics, Tsougarakis argues that there is little 
evidence for direct preaching to Greek communities, and even less 
evidence of success. The Dominicans did manage to convert some 
Constantinopolitan scholars, such as Demetrius Cydones, the 
Chrysoberges brothers, and others, but this was not achieved through 
the preaching that was the friars' claim to fame, but through less 
formal meetings and exchanges. Instead, the friars were far more 
effective in maintaining Latin communities, particularly those who 
might be in danger of assimilating into the encompassing Greek 
surroundings. Tsougarakis's findings fit in well with what historians 
have been arguing in other studies. Robin Vose (in his book 
<italic>Dominicans, Muslims, and Jews in the Medieval Crown of Aragon</italic>, 
uncited by Tsougarakis), for example, argues that in contrast to the 
dominant historiographic tradition, the Dominicans devoted little 
effort to the conversion of non-Christians. Tsougarakis and Vose both 
argue that the primary effect of the mendicant orders was to 
strengthen Latin Christian affiliation, particularly in areas with 
many competing religious communities. Nor were the mendicants' 
activities in the Inquisition any more successful. Tsougarakis devotes 
a section to the presence of the Fraticelli in Greece, a welcome 
glimpse into the presence and apparent success of less-orthodox groups. 
These two chapters are the richest and most stimulating in the book, 
and hold the broadest appeal.</p>
    <p>A further strength of Tsougarakis's book is the attention paid to 
smaller orders. The fifth chapter focuses on the little-known 
Crociferi order, a hospital order like the better-known knights of St. 
John, but without the added responsibility of military defense. The 
Crociferi had only two convents in the Latin east, one in Crete and 
one in Negroponte, both Venetian territories. The sixth chapter 
examines the Augustinian friars, while the short seventh chapter 
covers groups with a limited presence in Latin Greece: regular canons, 
Servites, and Carmelites.</p>
    <p>Tsougarakis's book is a substantial contribution to the study of 
Greece after 1204, providing a useful catalog of the many churches, 
convents, and dependencies of the religious orders; more than that, 
however, it illuminates the richness and distinctiveness of the late 
medieval Aegean world. Noticeably missing from the book, however, are 
the churches and convents of the military orders, which Tsougarakis 
argues were fundamentally different than other orders. While the 
exclusion of the Hospitaller <italic>Ordenstaat</italic> on Rhodes makes sense, 
the inclusion of the foundations of the Hospitallers, Templars, and 
the Order of St. Sampson (founded in Constantinople) in Latin Greece 
would have significantly deepened the book, particularly as some of 
the other orders he discusses were hospital orders. The book uses a 
variety of sources, but draws its richest material from the Archivio 
di Stato in Venice, such as the collection of wills from Crete and 
other notarial documents. As noted in his title, Tsougarakis ventures 
only up to 1500, by which time most of the Latin Greece had come under 
Ottoman rule. While this is sensible in many ways, Tsougarakis admits 
that the best documentation for many convents survives from the early 
modern period, and the reader can only hope that someone will follow 
up on Tsougarakis's meticulous work with research on those last 
fascinating centuries. It is unfortunate that the index does not list 
the churches by the city in which they are found; this would make the 
richness of the book considerably more user-friendly. I was somewhat 
surprised by the lack of archaeological and architectural material in 
the book; medieval Greece has been the focus of considerable 
archaeological work recently, but very little of this appears in the 
book. There are no plans of buildings, and very few descriptions of 
what might still remain. While Tsougarakis is not an art historian, an 
acknowledgement and discussion of the contribution of this body of 
evidence would have been appropriate.</p>
    <p>Despite Tsougarakis's evident interest in the question of religious 
interaction between Greeks and Latins, he rarely discusses the 
connections between Greek and Latin monasticism specifically. Greece 
had of course been home to monastic communities for centuries before 
the Fourth Crusade, yet Tsougarakis never ties monasticism's earlier 
history and its instantiation under the Latin occupation. Yet his own 
work demonstrates that the Latins often occupied older Greek 
monasteries, and many churches and convents were alternately occupied 
by both groups successively. What was the dynamic of this 
relationship? How did the long history of Greek monasticism affect 
Latin communities and vice versa? Nor does the book discuss what 
presence Greek communities continued to have in Latin Greece. The 
absence of such concerns is in part, I suspect, a consequence of the 
organization of Tsougarakis's study, which is structured around 
specific religious communities and orders, rather than by themes or a 
central argument. Both approaches of course have advantages and 
disadvantages; <italic>The Latin Religious Orders in Medieval Greece</italic> 
will generally be useful to students and academics as a resource for 
those researching Latin Greece, but is unlikely to be read through. 
The book brings to the attention of scholars a valuable body of 
archival material and presents it in a systematic, enlightening, and 
accessible manner.</p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
